Regina G. Ziegler

Association of the Age at Menarche with Site-Specific Cancer Risks in Pooled Data from Nine Cohorts

Abstract The average age at menarche declined in European and U.S. populations during the 19th and 20th centuries. The timing of pubertal events may have broad implications for chronic disease risks in aging women. Here we tested for associations of recalled menarcheal age with risks of 19 cancers in 536,450 women [median age, 60 years (range, 31–39 years)] in nine prospective U.S. and European cohorts that enrolled participants from 1981 to 1998. Cox regression estimated multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of the age at menarche with risk of each cancer in each cohort and random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate summary estimates for each cancer. Over a median 10 years of follow-up, 60,968 women were diagnosed with a first primary incident cancer. Inverse linear associations were observed for seven of 19 cancers studied. Each additional year in the age at menarche was associated with reduced risks of endometrial cancer (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89–0.94), liver cancer (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85–0.99), melanoma (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.98), bladder cancer (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99), and cancers of the colon (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96–0.99), lung (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–0.99), and breast (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99). All but one of these associations remained statistically significant following adjustment for baseline body mass index. Similarities in the observed associations between menarche and seven cancers suggest shared underlying causes rooted early in life. We propose as a testable hypothesis that early exposure to sex hormones increases mid-life cancer risks by altering functional capacities of stem cells with roles in systemic energy balance and tissue homeostasis. Significance: Age at menarche is associated with risk for seven cancers in middle-aged women, and understanding the shared underlying causal pathways across these cancers may suggest new avenues for cancer prevention.

Vitamin D binding protein genetic isoforms, serum vitamin D, and cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial

Associations between vitamin D biochemical status and cancer may be modified by vitamin D binding protein isoforms which are encoded by GC (group-specific component). We examined interactions between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the Gc isoforms Gc1-1, Gc1-2, and Gc2-2, and cancer risk within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial cohort based on 3,795 cases and 3,856 controls. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cancer risk according to 25(OH)D quantiles, stratified by Gc isoform. Separately, the GC-cancer risk association was examined using proportional hazards regression among 109,746 individuals with genetic data and 26,713 diagnosed with cancer. Specific vitamin D binding protein isoform subtypes were delineated and analyzed, including Gc1-1 subtypes (Gc1s-Gc1s, Gc1f-Gc1s, and Gc1f-Gc1f) and Gc2 subtypes (Gc1s-Gc2, Gc1f-Gc2, and Gc2-Gc2). For most cancers, the GC genotype did not modify the risk associations for 25(OH)D; e.g., the OR for high vs. low vitamin D quintile was 1.09 (0.89–1.33) for overall cancer risk among individuals with the Gc1-1 isoform and 1.04 (0.83–1.31) among those with either the Gc1-2 or Gc2-2 isoforms. ORs for high compared to low vitamin D tertile for colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer among those with the Gc1-1 vs. any Gc2 isoforms were, respectively, 0.60 vs. 0.73, 1.96 vs. 1.03, 1.30 vs. 1.18, and 1.19 vs. 1.22 (all p-interaction ≥0.36). However, GC qualitatively modified the vitamin D-bladder cancer risk association: OR = 1.70 (95% CI 0.96–2.98) among those with the Gc1-1 isoform and 0.52 (0.28–0.96) among those with any Gc2 isoforms (p-interaction = 0.03). When modeled without regard for 25(OH)D, Gc isoforms were generally not associated with cancer risk, although melanoma risk was significantly lower among individuals with the “f” subtype of the Gc1-1 isoform, specifically HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.98) for Gc1f-1s and 0.67 (0.45–1.00) for Gc1f-1f, compared to individuals with the Gc1s-Gc1s isoform. Vitamin D binding protein genetic isoforms may be associated with melanoma risk but do not modify the association between vitamin D status and cancer, with the possible exception of bladder cancer.