Investigator

Rebecca Karkia

Brunel University Of London

RKRebecca Karkia
Papers(2)
Effects of Asprosin a…Endometrial Cancer: A…
Collaborators(7)
T.R. NyakunengwaA. StewartChristina UwinsCristina SisuH. PatelIoannis KyrouJayanta Chatterjee
Institutions(5)
Brunel University Of …Unknown InstitutionUniversity of SurreyRoyal Surrey County H…University Hospitals …

Papers

Effects of Asprosin and Role of TLR4 as a Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer

(1) Background: Following the discovery of the adipokine/hormone asprosin, a substantial amount of research has provided evidence for its role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis, as well as appetite, and insulin sensitivity. Its levels are dysregulated in certain disease states, including breast cancer. To date, little is known about its role in endometrial cancer (EC). The present study investigated the effects of asprosin on the transcriptome of the Ishikawa and NOU-1 EC cell lines, and assessed the expression of asprosin’s candidate receptors (TLR4, PTPRD, and OR4M1) in health and disease. (2) Methods: tissue culture, RNA extraction, RNA sequencing, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, gene enrichment and in silico analyses were used for this study. (3) Results: TLR4 and PTPRD were significantly downregulated in EC when compared to healthy controls. TLR4 appeared to have a prognostic role in terms of overall survival (OS) in EC patients (i.e., higher expression, better OS). RNA sequencing revealed that asprosin affected 289 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Ishikawa cells and 307 DEGs in NOU-1 cells. Pathway enrichment included apoptosis, glycolysis, hypoxia, and PI3K/AKT/ mTOR/NOTCH signalling for Ishikawa-treated cells. In NOU-1, enriched processes included inflammatory response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, reactive oxygen species pathways, and interferon gamma responses. Other signalling pathways included mTORC1, DNA repair, and p53, amongst others. (4) Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of understanding receptor dynamics and signalling pathways in the context of asprosin’s role in EC, and provide evidence for a potential role of TLR4 as a diagnostic biomarker.

Endometrial Cancer: Analysing Patterns of Recurrence and Real-Life Outcome Data Using the 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP Risk Stratification System

To evaluate patterns of recurrence and explore the prognostic differences between the 2018 FIGO staging system and the 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk stratification system of endometrial cancer with an emphasis on early-stage disease. The incidence of endometrial cancer has risen by around 60% since the 90's. It is projected that by 2035 endometrial cancer will be the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death amongst females. This was a retrospective cohort study which included patients treated between 2010 and 2017. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was used to assess OS and RFS across different risk groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate prognostic risk factors implicated in recurrence. Different recurrence patterns across the subgroups were analysed with Pearson's chi-square test. The study included 692 patients with a recurrence rate of 14.9%. The median time to recurrence was 17.1 months (IQR:8.8-28.4). The mean OS varied between 97.2 months in the low-risk group to 63.1 months in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Mean RFS was 96.1 in the low-risk group and 58.9 in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). RFS was predicted by the following factors; high risk group (OR=3.87; p = 0.041), LVSI (OR=2.54, p = 0.005), carcinosarcoma (OR=2.20, p = 0.021) and serous subtype (OR=1.91, p = 0.01). Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for loco-regional and distant recurrence. Patients in the low-risk group were less likely to have distant recurrence (OR=0.08, p = 0.004). Similarly, negative LVSI and Grade 1 cancers were associated with decreased risk of distant recurrence (OR=0.34, p = 0.006 and OR=0.33, p = 0.007, respectively). There were no significant risk factors for loco-regional recurrence. The 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk stratification provides accurate estimates of recurrence risk and survival. Those treated in line with current guidance have significantly better outcomes.

6Works
2Papers
7Collaborators