Investigator

Ranjana S. Nawgiri

Unknown Institution

RSNRanjana S. Nawgiri
Papers(1)
Performance Evaluatio…
Collaborators(2)
Efstathia Polychronop…Ping Ren
Institutions(2)
Unknown InstitutionUniversity of Texas M…

Papers

Performance Evaluation of the Aptima hrHPV Nucleic Acid Amplification and Papanicolaou Co-Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening

Cervical cancer screening is evolving, with guidelines increasingly favoring high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) as a primary method. Although hrHPV NAATs offer high sensitivity for HPV-driven cervical cancers, Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology can detect additional gynecologic malignancies, including HPV-independent ones. This study evaluated the Hologic Aptima hrHPV NAAT and Pap co-testing using 61,089 samples from patients aged ≥21 years screened between 2018 and 2023. The cohort was predominantly White (78.4%), with 16.5% Black, 4.1% Asian, and 38.9% Hispanic subjects. Overall percentage agreement (PA) between hrHPV NAAT and Pap was 87.9%, with high negative PA (93.6%) and lower positive PA (52.3%). Excluding atypical squamous/glandular cell abnormalities improved overall and positive PA to 93.0% and 78.3%, respectively. The Aptima hrHPV NAAT showed high sensitivity for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (98.3%) and squamous cell carcinoma (90.0%) but lower sensitivity for low-grade lesions (73.3%), adenocarcinoma (13.3%), and other malignancies (28.6%). Notably, 29 high-grade lesions or malignant cases had abnormal Pap but were hrHPV negative; 24 (82.8%) were histologically confirmed, including endometrial, cervical, ovarian, and fallopian tube carcinomas (mostly non-HPV-related). These findings emphasize cytology's role in detecting malignancies potentially missed by hrHPV testing alone and support co-testing in diverse populations. The Aptima hrHPV NAAT is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for primary HPV screening, reinforcing this need.

1Papers
2Collaborators