Raluca Anca Balan

HPV-Independent Cervical Cancer—A New Challenge of Modern Oncology

Cervical cancer is a major global health concern with serious implications for women’s health. It is most often caused by persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types. However, about 5–11% of cervical carcinoma cases are HPV-independent, entities with their own unique set of histopathological, molecular, and clinical features. The histopathological forms of HPV-independent cervical cancer include gastric-type adenocarcinoma, clear-cell, mesonephric, and endometrioid carcinoma. Unlike HPV-associated cervical cancers, which require E6 and E7 oncogenes for their expression, HPV-independent tumors exhibit specific mutations such as TP53, PIK3CA, KRAS, STK11, and PTEN. These mutations lead to alternative oncogenic pathways. Diagnosis of HPV-independent cervical adenocarcinoma is often delayed because of possible misclassification as endometrial adenocarcinomas, which frequently results from inadequate HPV testing. This often leads to advanced presentation stages, higher rates of lymphovascular invasion, and, in many cases, a reduced response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy—though outcomes can vary across histotypes and selected patient subgroups—due to the immune-cold tumor microenvironment. Although these morphologic and molecular characteristics describe tumors that are very difficult to manage, PI3K/mTOR and KRAS inhibitors may offer potential therapeutic options for selected patients. This review focuses on the pathogenic and molecular mechanisms, histopathological features, prognosis, and therapeutic difficulties of HPV-independent cervical cancers. Moreover, it provides a comprehension of contemporary issues in diagnostic methods and some new therapeutic approaches, suggesting the need for precision medicine in this aggressive type of cervical cancer. Further studies are necessary to enhance early detection, improve treatment results, and increase survival rates for patients with HPV-independent cervical cancer.

Hydatidiform Moles: The Contribution of Ancillary Techniques in Refining Their Histopathological Diagnosis

A hydatidiform mole (HM) is the most common form of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Differentiating hydatidiform moles (HMs) from non-molar pregnancies and distinguishing complete HMs (CHMs) from partial HMs (PHMs) remains challenging due to overlapping morphological features and a high rate of misclassification. This study aimed to evaluate reliable immunohistochemical markers for improving diagnostic accuracy and addressing the limitations of current molecular techniques. We retrospectively analyzed 64 cases of HMs and hydropic abortions (HAs), diagnosed in women aged 17–36 years between 2010 and 2024, at the Pathology Department of “Elena Doamna” Clinical Hospital, Iași, Romania. Routine histology was supplemented with immunohistochemistry (IHC) using p57, Ki-67, β-hCG, and E-cadherin, with semiquantitative immunoscores applied. Histology revealed 38 PHMs (59.37%), 16 CHMs (23.88%), and 10 HAs (15.62%). p57 was positive in 100% of PHMs and HAs but only in 18% of CHMs. Ki-67 expression was predominantly strong in CHMs, variable in PHMs, and weak in all HAs. β-hCG showed the highest expression in CHMs, followed by PHMs and HAs, while E-cadherin was strongest in HAs. Morphological features alone are insufficient for HM diagnosis; thus, ancillary techniques like p57 IHC and DNA genotyping are crucial to differentiate complete, partial moles, and non-molar specimens by revealing unique genetic patterns, especially p57 absence in CHMs and ploidy/parental origin in PHMs. In this context, an algorithmic approach integrating histology, immunohistochemistry, and genotyping reduces interobserver variability and refines diagnostic precision.

BMI-1 Expression Heterogeneity in Endometriosis-Related and Non-Endometriotic Ovarian Carcinoma

BMI-1 is a key component of stem cells, which are essential for normal organ development and cell phenotype maintenance. BMI-1 expression is deregulated in cancer, resulting in the alteration of chromatin and gene transcription repression. The cellular signaling pathway that governs BMI-1 action in the ovarian carcinogenesis sequences is incompletely deciphered. In this study, we set out to analyze the immunohistochemical (IHC) BMI-1 expression in two different groups: endometriosis-related ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and non-endometriotic ovarian carcinoma (NEOC), aiming to identify the differences in its tissue profile. Methods: BMI-1 IHC expression has been individually quantified in epithelial and in stromal components by using adapted scores systems. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between BMI-1 epithelial and stromal profile in each group and between groups and its correlation with classical clinicopathological characteristics. Results: BMI-1 expression in epithelial tumor cells was mostly low or negative in the EOC group, and predominantly positive in the NEOC group. Moreover, the stromal BMI-1 expression was variable in the EOC group, whereas in the NEOC group, stromal BMI-1 expression was mainly strong. We noted statistically significant differences between the epithelial and stromal BMI-1 profiles in each group and between the two ovarian carcinoma (OC) groups. Conclusions: Our study provides solid evidence for a different BMI-1 expression in EOC and NEOC, corresponding to the differences in their etiopathogeny. The reported differences in the BMI-1 expression of EOC and NEOC need to be further validated in a larger and homogenous cohort of study.