Investigator

Raúl Murillo

Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

RMRaúl Murillo
Papers(5)
Cervical precancer an…High-risk human papil…Safety and Acceptabil…Quantification of imp…Efectividad de la cri…
Collaborators(10)
Jairo BonillaEdwin PulidoEric LucasGinna Fernández-DeazaJoaquín LunaMauricio GonzálezMontserrat SolerPartha BasuPhilip CastleÓscar Gamboa
Institutions(6)
Hospital Universitari…Centre International …KeraltyInstituto Nacional De…Cleveland ClinicNational Cancer Insti…

Papers

Cervical precancer and invasive cancer among women living with HIV in Latin America: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Data on the occurrence of cervical precancer and cancer among women living with HIV (WLHIV) in Latin American countries (LAC) are scarce and highly heterogeneous. Methods We conducted a systematic review summarizing data about the incidence/prevalence of invasive cervical cancer (CC) and high-grade precancerous lesions among WLHIV in LAC. Literature in PubMed and LILACS was searched. The primary outcome was invasive cancer incidence, and prevalence of high-grade lesions as key indicators for the WHO CC elimination strategy. Individual reports on invasive cancer incidence and prevalence of precancerous lesions were obtained, and a random effects meta-analysis was conducted for the latter. Results In total, 34,343 WLHIV from four studies reporting CC incidence in seven LAC were included, and 6079 WLHIV from 17 studies reporting prevalence of precancerous lesions in three LAC were included. CC incidence ranged between 136.0 and 398.4 per 100,000 WLHIV (with or without antiretroviral therapy). The weighted prevalence of high-grade lesions was 4.1% (95%CI: 3.8%–6.0%) with a double peak at ages 20–24 and 35–39 years. Differences in prevalence of high-grade lesions were also observed by screening approach: co-testing (11.9%), colposcopy (6.0%), cytology (4.2%), and HPV tests (3.2%). Conclusions The high incidence of invasive cancer and prevalence of high-grade lesions underline challenges to reach the WHO’s elimination goal of CC incidence below four per 100,000 among WLHIV. Moreover, the high prevalence of high-grade lesions at younger ages than in the general population is a call to accelerate the implementation of the new WHO screening recommendations in WLHIV.

Safety and Acceptability of Three Ablation Treatments for High-Grade Cervical Precancer: Early Data From a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial

PURPOSE This ongoing trial is comparing the efficacy and safety of three ablation treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher. Here, we present early data regarding pain, side effects, and acceptability of CO2 gas-based cryotherapy (CO2), nongas cryotherapy, and thermal ablation (TA). Efficacy results are expected to become available in late 2023. MATERIALS AND METHODS This noninferiority randomized trial is taking place in El Salvador, China, and Colombia. Patients are 1,152 eligible women with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher who will receive one of three ablation treatments. Pain is measured before, during, and after treatment with a visual analog scale (1-10). Side effects and acceptability are assessed at 6 weeks. RESULTS To date, 1,024 of 1,152 (89%) women were randomly assigned to treatment. The median pain level was higher during TA (4, IQR = 4) than CO2 (2, IQR = 4) or nongas cryotherapy (2, IQR = 4) ( P < .01, range: 0-10). The most common post-treatment symptom was watery discharge, reported by 97.9% of women, and it lasted longer in the CO2 group than the other two treatments (in days, median [IQR]: CO2 = 20[20], nongas cryotherapy = 15[10], TA = 18[15], P < .01). Bleeding was reported more frequently in women treated with TA (27.6%) than CO2 (17.5) or nongas cryotherapy (18.7%) ( P < .01). The majority of patients reported being very satisfied with the treatment they received at 6 weeks (91%) and again at 12 months post-treatment (97%). CONCLUSION Despite differences in pain and side effects across ablation treatments, all were safe and highly acceptable to patients. In addition to efficacy, considerations such as cost and portability may be more significant in choosing a treatment method.

Quantification of impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening programmes – a case study from Argentina, Bangladesh, Colombia, Morocco, Sri Lanka, and Thailand

It is quite well documented that the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer screening services in all countries, irrespective of their resources and healthcare settings. While quantitative estimates on reduction in volume of screening tests or diagnostic evaluation are readily available from the high-income countries, very little data are available from the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). From the CanScreen5 global cancer screening data repository we identified six LMICs through purposive sampling based on the availability of cancer screening data at least for the years 2019 and 2020. These countries represented those in high human development index (HDI) categories (Argentina, Colombia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) and medium HDI categories (Bangladesh and Morocco). No data were available from low HDI countries to perform similar analysis. The reduction in the volume of tests in 2020 compared to the previous year ranged from 14.1% in Bangladesh to 72.9% in Argentina (regional programme) for cervical screening, from 14.2% in Bangladesh to 49.4% in Morocco for breast cancer screening and 30.7% in Thailand for colorectal cancer screening. Number of colposcopies was reduced in 2020 compared to previous year by 88.9% in Argentina, 38.2% in Colombia, 27.4% in Bangladesh, and 52.2% in Morocco. The reduction in detection rates of CIN 2 or worse lesions ranged from 20.7% in Morocco to 45.4% in Argentina. Reduction of breast cancer detection by 19.1% was reported from Morocco. No association of the impact of pandemic could be seen with HDI categories. Quantifying the impact of service disruptions in screening and diagnostic tests will allow the programmes to strategize how to ramp up services to clear the backlogs in screening and more crucially in further evaluation of screen positives. The data can be used to estimate the impact on stage distribution and avoidable mortality from these common cancers.

Efectividad de la crioterapia suministrada por enfermeras para lesiones preneoplásicas del cuello uterino

Introducción. El cáncer de cuello uterino es un problema de salud pública relevante en países de ingresos medios y bajos. El seguimiento de mujeres con tamización positiva y el acceso a tratamiento para neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC) son retos mayores en estos países.Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad de la crioterapia suministrada por enfermeras en casos de neoplasia intraepitelial de cérvix.Materiales y métodos. Se hizo la inspección visual directa con ácido acético y solución yodada (VIA-VILI), y se practicó colposcopia con biopsia, a mujeres entre los 25 y los 59 años, residentes en zonas de bajos ingresos de Bogotá. Profesionales de enfermería entrenados ofrecieron tratamiento inmediato con crioterapia a mujeres positivas en la inspección visual. Se les practicó colposcopia con biopsia antes del tratamiento y en un control a los 12 meses. Se evaluó la efectividad mediante tasas de curación (resultado: sin lesión) y regresión de NIC2/3 (resultado: ≤NIC1), por verificación colposcópica e histológica.Resultados. Se tamizaron 4.957 mujeres. En total, 499 fueron positivas y 472 aceptaron el tratamiento inmediato. Recibieron crioterapia por enfermería 365 mujeres (11 NIC2/3). La tasa de curación fue del 72 % (IC95%: 39-94 %) por verificación colposcópica, y del 40 % (IC95%: 22-85 %) por histología. Las tasas de regresión fueron del 100 y el 60 %, respectivamente. Se reportaron dos eventos adversos no graves relacionados.Conclusiones. Las tasas de curación y regresión por verificación colposcópica son similares a las reportadas con crioterapia administrada por médicos. El tamaño de la muestra con NIC2/3 dificulta la comparación por tipo de verificación. Los hallazgos apoyan la implementación de estrategias de “ver y tratar” por parte de enfermería en poblaciones con acceso limitado a servicios de salud.

5Papers
11Collaborators