Rachel Masch

Adoption and Implementation of Affordable Cancer Technologies in El Salvador: Identifying Implementation Strategies for Successful Cervical Cancer Prevention in Resource-Limited Settings

As part of the affordable cancer technology program, our team developed and tested a portable thermal ablation (TA) cervical precancer treatment. This research helped support subsequent implementation of the technology in El Salvador. Here, we review successful implementation strategies deployed during the process and point to challenges and implications for other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We use the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment framework to guide the discussion and identify associated implementation strategies used during each phase. Significant strategies were the development and maintenance of multi-actor partnerships and accessing new funding to introduce innovations to the country. In this case, planning for implementation began before the decision to adopt TA. The case of El Salvador highlights the need for such pragmatic approaches to shorten the time between scientific research and clinical practice in LMICs. The impact of these efforts has been significant: El Salvador has gone from one of the countries with the lowest cervical cancer screening rates in the region to one that can potentially meet elimination targets in the coming decades. This experience can serve as a blueprint for cervical cancer control efforts in other LMICs.

Outcomes for Step-Wise Implementation of a Human Papillomavirus Testing–Based Cervical Screen-and-Treat Program in El Salvador

PURPOSE The Cervical Cancer Prevention in El Salvador (CAPE) project is a public-sector intervention introducing lower-cost human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in all four departments of the Paracentral region that screened a total of 28,015 women. After demonstrating success of an HPV screen-and-treat (S&T) algorithm over colposcopy management in the first two phases, the third phase scaled up the S&T strategy. We present results from phase III and evaluate S&T components across the entire project. METHODS During phase III, 17,965 women age 30-59 years underwent HPV testing. HPV-positive women were asked to return and, if eligible, received gas-based cryotherapy. We compare loss to follow-up and time intervals between S&T steps across the three phases. RESULTS There were no differences in HPV positivity across phases (phase I, 11.9%; phase II, 11.4%; phase III, 12.3%; P = .173). Although most HPV-positive women completed indicated follow-up procedures within 6 months in phases I (93.3%, 111 of 119) and II (92.3%, 429 of 465), this proportion declined to 74.9% (1,659 of 2,214; P < .001) in phase III. Mean days between testing and delivery of results to patients increased over program phases (phase I, 23.2 days; phase II, 46.7 days; phase III, 99.8 days; P < .001). CONCLUSION A public-sector implementation of an HPV-based S&T algorithm was successfully scaled up in El Salvador, albeit with losses in efficiency. After CAPE, the Ministry of Health changed its screening guidelines and procured additional tests to expand the program.

Safety and Acceptability of Three Ablation Treatments for High-Grade Cervical Precancer: Early Data From a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial

PURPOSE This ongoing trial is comparing the efficacy and safety of three ablation treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher. Here, we present early data regarding pain, side effects, and acceptability of CO2 gas-based cryotherapy (CO2), nongas cryotherapy, and thermal ablation (TA). Efficacy results are expected to become available in late 2023. MATERIALS AND METHODS This noninferiority randomized trial is taking place in El Salvador, China, and Colombia. Patients are 1,152 eligible women with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher who will receive one of three ablation treatments. Pain is measured before, during, and after treatment with a visual analog scale (1-10). Side effects and acceptability are assessed at 6 weeks. RESULTS To date, 1,024 of 1,152 (89%) women were randomly assigned to treatment. The median pain level was higher during TA (4, IQR = 4) than CO2 (2, IQR = 4) or nongas cryotherapy (2, IQR = 4) ( P < .01, range: 0-10). The most common post-treatment symptom was watery discharge, reported by 97.9% of women, and it lasted longer in the CO2 group than the other two treatments (in days, median [IQR]: CO2 = 20[20], nongas cryotherapy = 15[10], TA = 18[15], P < .01). Bleeding was reported more frequently in women treated with TA (27.6%) than CO2 (17.5) or nongas cryotherapy (18.7%) ( P < .01). The majority of patients reported being very satisfied with the treatment they received at 6 weeks (91%) and again at 12 months post-treatment (97%). CONCLUSION Despite differences in pain and side effects across ablation treatments, all were safe and highly acceptable to patients. In addition to efficacy, considerations such as cost and portability may be more significant in choosing a treatment method.