Investigator

Rachel Kupets

Gynecologic Oncology · University of Toronto

RKRachel Kupets
Papers(2)
Assessing para‐aortic…Are Women with Antece…
Collaborators(5)
Allan CovensAndra NicaAnouk BenselerCarlos Parra‐HerranDanielle Vicus
Institutions(3)
University Of TorontoSunnybrook Odette Can…Brigham And Womens Ho…

Papers

Assessing para‐aortic nodal status in high‐grade endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy

Abstract Objective To determine the accuracy of pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) in detecting positive para‐aortic (PA) lymph nodes in high‐grade uterine cancer, and to determine the recurrence rate in patients with high‐grade uterine cancers who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on negative pelvic SLNs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed, high‐grade endometrial cancer who underwent surgery, including pelvic SLNs with or without PA node dissection, at a tertiary care institution between 2015 and 2020. Baseline demographics, surgical management, pathology data, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and survival analysis. Results Postoperative histology of the 110 patients meeting inclusion criteria was 45.5% grade 3 endometrioid, 36.4% serous, 10.9% clear cell, and 7.3% carcinosarcoma. On final pathology, 63.7% were stage 1, and 23.6% were stage 3C with positive nodes. A total of 63 patients (57.3%) had a PA lymph node dissection (56 bilateral, 7 unilateral) in addition to the pelvic SLN. Among this group, 5.8% (95% confidence interval 1.2%–16.0%) had a positive PA node despite a negative pelvic SLN. Among those with a negative pelvic SLN and no adjuvant chemotherapy ( n  = 75), the rate of distant recurrence was 14.7%, and 3‐year recurrence‐free survival was 71.9%. Conclusion The rate of isolated PA node metastasis in high‐grade endometrial cancers despite a negative pelvic SLN may be significantly higher than the accepted rate of isolated PA node metastasis in low‐grade endometrial cancer. This supports adjuvant treatment decisions continuing to incorporate primary tumor pathology and molecular classification.

Are Women with Antecedent Low-Grade Cytology and <CIN2 Findings in Colposcopy Being Overmanaged?

To determine the baseline and cumulative risks of cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 3 (CIN3) and invasive cervical cancer in patients with <CIN2 colposcopy findings after a low-grade screening cytology finding (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]). By linking administrative databases, including cytology, pathology, cancer registries, and physician billing history, a population-based cohort study was performed on participants with <CIN2 initial colposcopy results after a low-grade antecedent cytology finding, between January 2012 and December 2013. Three and 5-year risks of CIN3 and invasive cervical cancer were generated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Among the 36 887 participants included in the study, CIN3 incidence based on referral cytology were as follows at 3 and 5 years, respectively: normal, 0.7% and 0.9%; ASCUS, 4.31% and 5.6%; and LSIL, 5.9% and 7.2%. Three- and 5-year incidence of invasive cancer were 0% and 0.02% for normal cytology, 0.08% and 0.11% for ASCUS, and 0.04% and 0.07% for LSIL, respectively. Stratifying risk by biopsy result at initial colposcopy, 3- and 5-year CIN3 incidences were 2.85% and 3.81% with a negative biopsy, 7.09% and 8.32% with an LSIL biopsy, and 4.11% and 5.2% when no biopsy was done, respectively. Three- and 5-year incidence of invasive cancer was 0% and 0.05% after a negative biopsy, 0% and 0% after LSIL biopsy, and 0.05% and 0.08% when no biopsy was done, respectively. When initial colposcopy is done after a low-grade screening cytology result and <CIN2 is identified, the risk of CIN3 and invasive cancer is low, particularly when biopsies indicate LSIL. Surveillance strategies should balance the likelihood of detecting CIN3 with the potential harms over management with too frequent screening or colposcopic interventions in low-risk patients.

51Works
2Papers
5Collaborators
Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Staging

Positions

Gynecologic Oncology

University of Toronto

Links & IDs
0000-0001-6318-970X

Scopus: 6506601418