Peter Grant

Use of menopausal hormone therapy before and after diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival—A prospective cohort study in Australia

AbstractMenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use before ovarian cancer diagnosis has been associated with improved survival but whether the association varies by type and duration of use is inconclusive; data on MHT use after treatment, particularly the effect on health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), are scarce. We investigated survival in women with ovarian cancer according to MHT use before and after diagnosis, and post‐treatment MHT use and its association with HRQOL in a prospective nationwide cohort in Australia. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and propensity scores to reduce confounding by indication. Among 690 women who were peri‐/postmenopausal at diagnosis, pre‐diagnosis MHT use was associated with a significant 26% improvement in ovarian cancer‐specific survival; with a slightly stronger association for high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.54–0.87). The associations did not differ by recency or duration of use. Among women with HGSC who were pre‐/perimenopausal or aged ≤55 years at diagnosis (n = 259), MHT use after treatment was not associated with a difference in survival (HR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.48–2.22). Compared to non‐users, women who started MHT after treatment reported poorer overall HRQOL before starting MHT and this difference was still seen 1–3 months after starting MHT. In conclusion, pre‐diagnosis MHT use was associated with improved survival, particularly in HGSC. Among women ≤55 years, use of MHT following treatment was not associated with poorer survival for HGSC. Further large‐scale studies are needed to understand menopause‐specific HRQOL issues in ovarian cancer.

Common analgesics and ovarian cancer survival: the Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) Study

Abstract Background Most women with ovarian cancer (OC) are diagnosed with advanced disease. They often experience recurrence after primary treatment, and their subsequent prognosis is poor. Our goal was to evaluate the association between use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including regular and low-dose aspirin, and 5-year cancer-specific survival after an OC diagnosis. Methods The Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle study is a prospective population-based cohort of 958 Australian women with OC. Information was gathered through self-completed questionnaires. We classified NSAID use during the year prediagnosis and postdiagnosis as none or occasional (<1 d/wk), infrequent (1-3 d/wk), and frequent (≥4 d/wk) use. We measured survival from the start of primary treatment: surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for analyses of prediagnosis use, or 12 months after starting treatment (postdiagnosis use) until the earliest of date of death from OC (other deaths were censored) or last follow-up to 5 years. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and applied inverse-probability of treatment weighting to minimize confounding. We also calculated restricted mean survival times. Results Compared with nonusers and infrequent users, we observed better survival associated with frequent NSAID use prediagnosis (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.97) or postdiagnosis (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.94). Estimates were similar for aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs, new and continuous users and in weighted models. These differences would translate to a 2.5-month increase in mean survival by 5 years postdiagnosis. There was no association with acetaminophen. Conclusions Our findings confirm a previous study suggesting NSAID use might improve OC survival.

Pre- and Post-Diagnosis Diet Quality and Ovarian Cancer Survival

Abstract Background: Prior studies evaluating diet quality in relation to ovarian cancer survival are sparse, and to date none have assessed diet quality or diet-quality change after diagnosis. Methods: In the prospective Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) study, diet-quality scores were calculated using data from food frequency questionnaires completed pre-diagnosis (n = 650) and 12 months' post-diagnosis (n = 503). We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between diet quality and survival. Results: During the median follow-up of 4.4 years, 278 women died from ovarian cancer. There was no evidence of an association between diet quality pre- or post-diagnosis and progression-free, overall, or ovarian cancer–specific survival. No survival advantage was observed for women who had either improved their diet quality or who consumed a high-quality diet both before and 12 months after diagnosis. Conclusions: Higher pre- and post-diagnosis diet quality was not associated with better survival outcomes in this cohort of women with ovarian cancer. Impact: Diet quality is important for a range of health outcomes but may not improve survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and ovarian cancer survival: the Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) study

There is some evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) might improve cancer survival, but reliable data for ovarian cancer are scarce. We evaluated this using data from the prospective Ovarian cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle (OPAL) study. We included 954 Australian women diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 and considered pre-diagnosis and post-diagnosis medication use and ovarian cancer survival. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for all medication users and monotherapy users (those who used a single medication). We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to further reduce confounding and estimated restricted mean survival time at 7 years (end of study). We observed a modest association between ARB use before or after diagnosis and progression-free and ovarian cancer-specific survival. Estimates were further from the null for post-diagnosis use ARB monotherapy, and when weighted for users (pre-diagnosis use aHR=0.71, 95 %CI: 0.51-0.98; post-diagnosis use aHR=0.60, 0.36-1.01 for ovarian cancer-specific survival). If real, this would translate to a 6-month increase in mean survival for ARB monotherapy. The associations were attenuated in models weighted for all women. There was little evidence of an association with ACE inhibitors. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is required to confirm these findings. If the observed associations are confirmed, ARBs may warrant consideration as a first line hypertension treatment for women with ovarian cancer.