PNFParisa N. Fallah
Papers(2)
Challenges and Opport…A randomized clinical…
Collaborators(10)
Ricardina RangeiroKathleen M SchmelerRebecca Richards-Kort…Anisa MburuAsima MukhopadhyayBiruck Gashawbeza BatuCarla CarrilhoDercia ChanguleEdward L. TrimbleElizabeth Y. Chiao
Institutions(7)
The University Of Tex…Maputo Central Hospit…Rice UniversityAga Khan Hospital Mom…Oxford University Hos…St Pauls Hospital Mil…National Cancer Insti…

Papers

Challenges and Opportunities in the Treatment of Invasive Cervical Cancer in Low-Resource Settings: A Survey of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society Fellowship Programs

PURPOSE Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) Global Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship aims to build human capacity to address the burden of cervical cancer in LMICs. This study assesses resource constraints experienced at fellowship sites with regard to management of cervical cancer. METHODS From September to December 2020, one fellow from each of the 12 existing IGCS fellowship programs participated in a survey that assessed capacity for cervical cancer management, including access to care, diagnostics and treatment, cancer surveillance, and palliative care. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS Patients at IGCS sites experienced significant delays to care, especially for chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Less than half of the sites had a gynecology-trained pathologist, and only 58% of sites had access to a magnetic resonance imaging machine, though with many delays in obtaining imaging reads. For treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not commonly used. Access to radiation therapy is poor, with 58% of sites reporting wait times of 5-8 weeks or more. The radiation machine downtime ranges from 1 to 3 months per year, creating gaps where no patients can access this treatment. Palliative care is practiced by variable members of the health care team although hospice services are rare. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates significant resource constraints experienced by gynecologic oncology providers in various LMICs when managing cervical cancer. This includes delays to diagnosis, poor access to chemoradiation services, and need for palliative care. Despite these limitations, the IGCS Global Gynecologic Oncology Fellowships have built workforce capacity to manage cervical cancer, serving as local champions to address this disease.

A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of thermal ablation versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical cancer risk reduction in women living with HIV in Mozambique.

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of death in low- and middle-income countries. Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) carry a 6-fold higher risk of cervical cancer than the general population. The effectiveness of thermal ablation versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in women living with HIV is uncertain, prompting this study. To compare the effectiveness of thermal ablation versus LEEP for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening results in women living with HIV. Thermal ablation is non-inferior to LEEP for treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection in women living with HIV. This is a prospective randomized clinical trial. Participants undergo screening with primary hrHPV testing. Those with positive hrHPV results undergo visual inspection with acetic acid and a review of genotyping results to determine eligibility for treatment. Those who are hrHPV-positive and positive by visual assessment with acetic acid, or human papillomavirus16/18 positive regardless of visual assessment with acetic acid result, are randomized to thermal ablation or LEEP. Participants undergo follow-up at 4 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedure. Participants include 25 to 49-year-old women living with HIV in Mozambique. Exclusion criteria include pregnancy, previous total hysterectomy, history of cervical cancer or prior treatment for CIN, or any condition that would preclude adherence to the study protocol. Persistent or recurrent CIN 2/3 (or worse diagnosis) and hrHPV infection at 12 months after initial treatment. To meet our primary objectives and to achieve a power of 0.8 (α = 0.025), we will need to randomize 126 participants with CIN 2/3, 63 to thermal ablation, and 63 to LEEP. We estimate that this will require screening a total of 4844 women living with HIV. We anticipate that study accrual will be completed in 3 years (2027), with an additional 18 months to complete all follow-up visits and data analysis. We anticipate presenting results in 2029. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT06326294.

5Works
2Papers
22Collaborators
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms