Olga Matylevich

Access to molecular classification in endometrial cancer recommended by ESGO–ESTRO–ESP guidelines: multi-national survey in Eastern Europe

Advances in tumor biology have transformed endometrial cancer management. Since 2021, ESGO-ESTRO-ESP (European Society of Gynaecological Oncology-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-European Society of Pathology) guidelines have incorporated molecular classification, which is essential in the 2025 update. Its implementation in Eastern Europe remains unclear. This study evaluated the availability, reimbursement, and integration of molecular classification at national and institutional levels. A 2-phase cross-sectional online survey was conducted from December 2024 to September 2025. National coordinators from 17 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology-affiliated countries reported on access, reimbursement, and guidelines. A second survey targeted 67 treatment centers to assess institutional practices. Full molecular profiling (p53-abnormal, POLE-ultra-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient) was available in 29.4% of countries, with partial access in 70.6%. Lack of reimbursement and accredited laboratories were the main barriers. At least 1 test was publicly funded in 58.8% of countries: p53 and mismatch repair-deficient immunohistochemistry in 70.0% and POLE-ultra-mutated next-generation sequencing in 29.4%. National guidelines existed in over half of the countries, but few included molecular classification. At the institutional level, testing was routine in 41.0% of centers, selective in 27.9%, and unavailable in 31.1%. Overall, 55.8% reported access via local or external laboratories. Comprehensive classification was significantly more available in settings with national/public reimbursement (79.2% vs 18.9%, p < .0001). POLE-ultra-mutated testing was more accessible in private than public hospitals (42.9% vs 33.3%, p = .006), while p53 immunohistochemistry was more common in high-volume centers (97.5% vs 76.2%, p = .01). Access to molecular classification in Eastern Europe remains limited because of insufficient reimbursement and laboratory resources. Addressing these disparities is essential to support equitable treatment and improve outcomes.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology resource-stratified guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer.

In 2023, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP), published evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Acknowledging that limitations exist even in high-income countries, some of these established standards of care are not applicable in clinical practice in some areas of the world. Following a global ESGO survey involving 256 clinicians from 57 countries, which pointed out potential limitations, barriers, and missing guidelines, ESGO decided to develop alternative management strategies for situations when optimal resources are unavailable or limited. A multi-disciplinary international development group consisting of 22 experts, utilizing feedback from the survey conducted mostly in low- and middle-income regions, identified potential limitations to the standards of care as defined in the updated ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines published in 2023 and suggested alternative approaches. New resource-stratified guidelines on the management of women living with the human immunodeficiency virus have been newly proposed. To ensure a global perspective, the guidelines were reviewed by 188 independent international practitioners from Asia, Africa, Europe, and South, Central, and North America. These resource-stratified guidelines focus on achieving the best patient outcomes, with alternative management strategies based on expert opinions in areas with limited evidence. They should be used as a guide for the next best alternatives in multi-disciplinary care settings such as diagnostics, pathology, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, palliative care, and follow-up management. Efforts should always focus on providing optimal available care. In the absence of key resources, the primary effort should be directed toward consulting and referring patients to other facilities that provide better conditions.