NohHyun Park

The new 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: what is different from the previous 2009 FIGO staging system?

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics committee modified the endometrial cancer (EC) staging system based on the histopathological feature and molecular profile. The aim is to evaluate the clinical implications of the new 2023 system compared with the previous 2009 system. We retrospectively identified 161 patients with EC who underwent primary surgical treatment between 2014 and 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital. The droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction for The median follow-up period was 62.9 months (range, 0.3-110.9), and the median age was 57.2 years old (range, 28.0-85.9). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the 2023 system with molecular classification was 80.3% for stage I, 75.2% for stage II, 61.2% for stage III, and 22.2% for stage IV (p<0.001). Patients with the 2009 stage I and II disease were restaged using the 2023 system. In contrast, patients with stage III and IV disease were fixed in the 2009 and 2023 systems. Molecular classification downstaged 10 patients (71.4%) to IAm The 2023 staging system for EC subdivided stages I and II compared to the 2009 system. The 2023 system with molecular classification is a good predictor of survival.

Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy

To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer. We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (≥8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) ( In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.