Noemi Tonti

The Role of Tumor Biomarkers in Tailoring the Approach to Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Growing evidence has demonstrated the role of mutations of tumor biomarkers in diagnosing and treating epithelial ovarian cancer. This review aims to analyze recent literature on the correlation between tumor biomarkers and chemotherapy in nonmucinous ovarian cancer, providing suggestions for personalized treatment approaches. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies and trials. BRCA1/2 mutations are central in homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer, but several other genetic mutations also contribute to varying cancer risks. While the role of MMR testing in ovarian cancer is debated, it is more commonly linked to non-serous ovarian cancer, often associated with Lynch syndrome. A significant proportion of ovarian cancer patients have HRD, affecting treatment decisions in both first-line (especially in advanced stages) and second-line therapy due to HRD’s connection with platinum-based therapy and PARP inhibitors’ response. However, validated genetic tests to identify HRD have not yet been universally implemented. There is no definitive therapeutic algorithm for advanced ovarian cancer, despite ongoing efforts and multiple proposed tools. Future research should focus on expanding the utility of biomarkers, reducing resistance, and increasing the actionable biomarker pool.

Expectant management or conization for persistent low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Analysis of 5-year outcomes

Objective: To investigate to describe outcomes of conization or expectant management for women with persistent (>24 months) low-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis focusing on five-year outcomes after persistent, histologically confirmed, low-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia undergoing conization or expectant management. Results: Charts of 219 women with persistent low-grade cervical lesions were retrieved. Overall, 98 (44.7%) and 121 (55.3%) women had conization and observation, respectively. Patients receiving conization were older than patients having observation (43 (range, 24-77) vs. 39 (range, 25-68) years; p=0.013). Focusing on the group of patients receiving conization, 16 (16.3%) women were diagnosed with CIN2+. The five-year risk of secondary conization was 5% (n=5). Focusing on patients having observation (n=121), 18 (14.8%) patients received conization, after a median of 16.5 (range, 6-30) months. Seven (5.8%) and 11 (9.1%) patients were diagnosed with persistent CIN1 and CIN2+, respectively. Not fully visible squamous-columnar junction at colposcopic examination (p=0.035) was associated with CIN2+ occurrence. No invasive cancer was observed Conclusions: Conization for persistent low-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia revealed “occult” CIN2+ in 16% of patients. However, expectant management appears safe and effective in this context, in women with fully visible squamous columnar junction. The decision between conization and expectant management should be discussed on an individual basis.