Nishino Koji

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer (ACE) trial: A randomized phase II study for advanced endometrial carcinoma

AbstractThis study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of three postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for endometrial cancer. Endometrioid cancer patients with intermediate‐risk stage I and II or high‐risk stage III and IV disease were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either paclitaxel‐epirubicin‐carboplatin (TEC), paclitaxel‐anthracycline (doxorubicin)‐carboplatin (TAC), or dose‐dense paclitaxel‐carboplatin (ddTC). The primary end‐point was the completion rate (CRate) of six cycles of treatment. The secondary end‐points were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred and one patients were treated as follows: 33 received TEC, 33 TAC, and 35 ddTC. The CRates for TEC, TAC, and ddTC were 94%, 64%, and 69%, respectively (P = .005). The TEC CRate was significantly higher than for the other two groups. However, the PFS and OS outcomes were not statistically different between the three groups. The 2‐year survival rates were 94%, 97%, and 97% for TEC, TAC, and ddTC, respectively. When compared to the current standard treatments for endometrial cancer, TEC is a promising candidate for a phase III trial based on its significantly superior CRate and equivalent PFS and OS. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000008911).

Efficacy of Rikkunshito on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Uterine Corpus or Cervical Cancer Treated With Cisplatin-Based Regimen-Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Confirmatory Study (JORTC-KMP03)

Background: The current standard treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with standard antiemetics is insufficient. Rikkunshito, a Japanese traditional herbal medicine, has been shown to improve cisplatin-induced anorexia and functional dyspepsia, and our exploratory study found that rikkunshito has an additive beneficial effect on CINV in patients with uterine corpus and cervical cancer receiving cisplatin containing chemotherapy (JORTC KMP-02). Methods: One hundred eighty patients with uterine corpus or cervical cancer who were scheduled to receive treatment with a cisplatin based regimen as initial chemotherapy were enrolled across 17 Japanese institutions. Patients were randomized with a 1:1 equal allocation ratio to the rikkunshito group or placebo groups and given oral administration on days 1 to 5 with standard antiemetics (granisetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no vomiting or rescue medication) during the delayed phase (24-120 hours after cisplatin treatment). The secondary endpoints were complete control (CC; CR without significant nausea) and total control (TC; CR without nausea) rates during the overall (0-120 hours), acute (0-24 hours), and delayed phases, as well as the CR rate during the overall and acute phases, time to treatment failure, degree of nausea and appetite during the overall phase, and adherence to the intervention. Results: The CR rate in the delayed phase was similar between the rikkunshito group and control groups (50.6% vs 58.9%, P  = .2631), as were the secondary endpoints: CR rates in the overall and acute phases, CC and TC rates in the overall, acute, and delayed phases, degrees of nausea and appetite, and time to treatment failure. Conclusion: Rikkunshito had no additive effect on CINV prevention in patients with uterine corpus or cervical cancer who were treated with a cisplatin based regimen and standard antiemetics. Clinical Trial Registration: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/re/reports/detail/66957 , identifier jRCT1011190007

Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an ancillary analysis of the JGOG3017-A4 study

Abstract Background Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIB–IVB patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, undergoing complete abdominal macroscopic resection with normal lymph nodes, was revealed to have no prognostic significance for survival in the LION trial. However, the proportion of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in the LION trial was only 2.2%, so the significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients with OCCC remains unclear. Methods We conducted an ancillary analysis of 619 patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial (JGOG 3017) in patients with OCCC. Of these, 89 were stage IIB to IVB, underwent a complete macroscopic resection, and had no grossly enlarged lymph nodes intraoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups: group A with lymphadenectomy and group B without lymphadenectomy. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare the two groups. Results Among the 89 patients, 77 (86.5%) underwent a lymphadenectomy (group A), while 12 (13.5%) did not (group B). Three-year PFS were 62.3% in group A and 58.3% in group B ( p  = 0.7705). Three-year OS were 73.0% in group A and 65.6% in group B ( p  = 0.6346). No significant differences were observed between two groups. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate a definitive survival benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced OCCC patients with complete resection and clinically negative nodes. Given the small sample size, these results should be interpreted with caution and regarded as exploratory.

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and platinum chemotherapy in cervical cancer: results of Japanese population from BEATcc

This study analyzed the efficacy of add-on atezolizumab to standard first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in 56 Japanese patients with metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer treated across 8 sites under the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group between October 2018 and August 2021 in the BEATcc trial. Patients were randomized to standard arm (standard therapy: cisplatin 50 mg/m² or carboplatin area under the curve of 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m², and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg) or experimental arm (standard therapy with atezolizumab 1,200 mg). Of 56 patients, 30 were in experimental arm vs. 26, standard arm (age: 53.2±12.9 vs. 54.7±12.2 years). Median progression-free survival was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=10.4-26.1) in experimental arm vs. 11.1 months (8.4-16.5) in standard arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.51; 95% CI=0.26-1.01). Median overall survival was 34.1 months (23.2-38.6) in the experimental arm vs. 31.6 months (16.4-36.5), standard arm (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.23-1.21). Objective response rate was 86.7% in experimental arm vs. 84.6%, standard arm. Complete response and partial response, respectively, were 23.3% and 63.3% in experimental arm and 26.9% and 57.7% in standard arm. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 80.0%, experimental arm and 88.5%, standard arm. Gastrointestinal/genitourinary fistula incidence was lower in Japanese patients (1 patient receiving atezolizumab), likely due to stricter inclusion criteria. Overall, add-on atezolizumab enhances the efficacy of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients as those in overall BEATcc population and could be considered a new first-line treatment option for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer in Japan. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03556839.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial

DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset. In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents. Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.