NLNing Lang
Papers(2)
Multitask Deep Learni…A comparison of 2D an…
Institutions(1)
Peking University Six…

Papers

Multitask Deep Learning for Automated Segmentation and Prognostic Stratification of Endometrial Cancer via Biparametric MRI

ABSTRACTBackgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecologic malignancy; accurate assessment of key prognostic factors is important for treatment planning.PurposeTo develop a deep learning (DL) framework based on biparametric MRI for automated segmentation and multitask classification of EC key prognostic factors, including grade, stage, histological subtype, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep myometrial invasion (DMI).Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsA total of 325 patients with histologically confirmed EC were included: 211 training, 54 validation, and 60 test cases.Field Strength/SequenceT2‐weighted imaging (T2WI, FSE/TSE) and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI, SS‐EPI) sequences at 1.5 and 3 T.AssessmentThe DL model comprised tumor segmentation and multitask classification. Manual delineation on T2WI and DWI acted as the reference standard for segmentation. Separate models were trained using T2WI alone, DWI alone and combined T2WI + DWI to classify dichotomized key prognostic factors. Performance was assessed in validation and test cohorts. For DMI, the combined model's was compared with visual assessment by four radiologists (with 1, 4, 7, and 20 years' experience), each of whom independently reviewed all cases.Statistical TestsSegmentation was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and average surface distance (ASD). Classification performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model AUCs were compared using DeLong's test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsIn the test cohort, DSCs were 0.80 (T2WI) and 0.78 (DWI) and JSCs were 0.69 for both. HD95 and ASD were 7.02/1.71 mm (T2WI) versus 10.58/2.13 mm (DWI). The classification framework achieved AUCs of 0.78–0.94 (validation) and 0.74–0.94 (test). For DMI, the combined model performed comparably to radiologists (p = 0.07–0.84).ConclusionsThe unified DL framework demonstrates strong EC segmentation and classification performance, with high accuracy across multiple tasks.Evidence Level3.Technical EfficacyStage 3.

A comparison of 2D and 3D magnetic resonance imaging-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models for the prognostic prediction of endometrial cancer: a pilot study

Abstract Background Accurate prognostic assessment is vital for the personalized treatment of endometrial cancer (EC). Although radiomics models have demonstrated prognostic potential in EC, the impact of region of interest (ROI) delineation strategies and the clinical significance of peritumoral features remain uncertain. Our study thereby aimed to explore the predictive performance of varying radiomics models for the prediction of LVSI, DMI, and disease stage in EC. Methods Patients with 174 histopathology-confirmed EC were retrospectively reviewed. ROIs were manually delineated using the 2D and 3D approach on T2-weighted MRI images. Six radiomics models involving intratumoral (2Dintra and 3Dintra), peritumoral (2Dperi and 3Dperi), and combined models (2Dintra + peri and 3Dintra + peri) were developed. Models were constructed using the logistic regression method with five-fold cross-validation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed, and was compared using the Delong’s test. Results No significant differences in AUC were observed between the 2Dintra and 3Dintra models, or the 2Dperi and 3Dperi models in all prediction tasks (P > 0.05). Significant difference was observed between the 3Dintra and 3Dperi models for LVSI (0.738 vs. 0.805) and DMI prediction (0.719 vs. 0.804). The 3Dintra + peri models demonstrated significantly better predictive performance in all 3 prediction tasks compared to the 3Dintra model in both the training and validation cohorts (P < 0.05). Conclusions Comparable predictive performance was observed between the 2D and 3D models. Combined models significantly improved predictive performance, especially with 3D delineation, suggesting that intra- and peritumoral features can provide complementary information for comprehensive prognostication of EC.

79Works
2Papers
Spinal NeoplasmsPrognosisEndometrial NeoplasmsBone NeoplasmsGiant Cell Tumor of BoneNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
Links & IDs
0000-0003-1860-2918

Scopus: 36142979000