Niels V. Heise

F16 Hybrids Derived from Steviol or Isosteviol Are Accumulated in the Mitochondria of Tumor Cells and Overcome Drug Resistance

Steviol and isosteviol were prepared from the commercially available sweetener stevioside and converted into lipophilic F16 hybrids. Their cytotoxicity was determined in SRB assays and showed to depend on both the substitution pattern of the aromatic substituent as well as on the spacer length. Therefore, compound 25 held an IC50 (A2780) of 180 nM, thus surpassing the activity of comparable rhodamine hybrids. Several of the compounds were also able to overcome drug resistance in the A2780/A2780cis model. Extra staining experiments showed a similar subcellular accumulation pattern of the F16 hybrids as a well-established mitocan, hence proving preferential mitochondrial accumulation but also some other accumulation in other cellular areas.

Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity

Asiatic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene, was converted into a series of piperazinyl, homopiperazinyl, and 1,5-diazocinyl spacered rhodamine conjugates, differing in the type of spacer and the substitution pattern on the rhodamine moiety of the hybrids. The compounds were tested for cytotoxic activity in SRB assays and compound 12, holding an EC50 of 0.8 nM, was the most cytotoxic compound of this series, but compound 18 (containing a ring expanded 1,5-diazocinyl moiety and n-propyl substituents on the rhodamine) was the most selective compound exhibiting a selectivity factor of almost 190 while retaining high cytotoxicity (EC50 = 1.9 nM, for A2780 ovarian carcinoma).

Rhodamine 101 Conjugates of Triterpenoic Amides Are of Comparable Cytotoxicity as Their Rhodamine B Analogs

Pentacyclic triterpenoic acids (betulinic, oleanolic, ursolic, and platanic acid) were selected and subjected to acetylation followed by the formation of amides derived from either piperazine or homopiperazine. These amides were coupled with either rhodamine B or rhodamine 101. All of these compounds were screened for their cytotoxic activity in SRB assays. As a result, the cytotoxicity of the parent acids was low but increased slightly upon their acetylation while a significant increase in cytotoxicity was observed for piperazinyl and homopiperazinyl amides. A tremendous improvement in cytotoxicity was observed; however, for the rhodamine B and rhodamine 101 conjugates, and compound 27, an ursolic acid derived homopiperazinyl amide holding a rhodamine 101 residue showed an EC50 = 0.05 µM for A2780 ovarian cancer cells while being less cytotoxic for non-malignant fibroblasts. To date, the rhodamine 101 derivatives presented here are the first examples of triterpene derivatives holding a rhodamine residue different from rhodamine B.