Investigator

Nicola Flaum

University Of Manchester

NFNicola Flaum
Papers(6)
<i>MSH2</i> is the ve…Epithelial ovarian ca…Dominant‐negative pat…High detection rate f…Optimization of polyg…Extended panel testin…
Collaborators(10)
Miriam J SmithD Gareth EvansEmma J CrosbieEmma R WoodwardGordon C. JaysonElke M. van VeenHelene SchlechtRobert D MorganFiona LallooGeorge J Burghel
Institutions(3)
University Of Manches…The Christie Nhs Foun…Manchester University…

Papers

Dominant‐negative pathogenic variant BRIP1 c. 1045G &gt;C is a high‐risk allele for non‐mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: A case‐control study

Abstract BRIP1 is a moderate susceptibility epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) gene. Having identified the BRIP1 c.1045G&gt;C missense variant in a number of families with EOC, we aimed to investigate the frequency of this and BRIP1 .2392C&gt;T pathogenic variant in patients with breast cancer (BC) and/or EOC. A case‐control study of 3767 cases and 2043 controls was undertaken investigating the presence of these variants using Sanger sequencing and gene panel data. Individuals with BC and/or EOC were grouped by family history. BRIP1 c.1045G&gt;C was associated with increased risk of BC/EOC (OR = 37.7; 95% CI 5.3–444.2; P  = 0.0001). The risk was highest for women with EOC (OR = 140.8; 95% CI 23.5–1723.0; P  &lt; 0.0001) and lower for BC (OR = 11.1; 95% CI 1.2–106.5; P  = 0.1588). BRIP1 c.2392C&gt;T was associated with smaller risks for BC/EOC (OR = 5.4; 95%CI 2.4–12.7; P  = 0.0003), EOC (OR = 5.9; 95% CI 1.3–23.0; p  = 0.0550) and BC (OR = 5.3; 95%CI 2.3–12.9; P  = 0.0009). Our study highlights the importance of BRIP1 as an EOC susceptibility gene, especially in familial EOC. The variant BRIP1 c.1045G&gt;C, rs149364097, is of particular interest as its dominant‐negative effect may confer a higher risk of EOC than that of the previously reported BRIP1 c.2392C&gt;T nonsense variant. Dominant‐negative missense variants may confer higher risks than their loss‐of‐function counterparts.

Optimization of polygenic risk scores in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant heterozygotes in epithelial ovarian cancer

A third of familial epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is explained by BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for BRCA1/2 heterozygotes associated with EOC have been created, but impact of combination with clinical and hormonal risk factors is unclear. We genotyped 300 cases and 355 controls and constructed modified PRSs based on those validated by Barnes et al. Model discrimination and EOC risk was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) values and difference between lowest and highest quintile odds ratios (ORs). We investigated model optimization using logistic regression to combine models with clinical and hormonal data. Unadjusted AUC values ranged from 0.526 to 0.551 with 2.2- to 2.3-fold increase in OR between lowest and highest quintiles (BRCA1 heterozygotes) and 0.574 to 0.585 AUC values with a 6.3- to 7.7-fold increase (BRCA2 heterozygotes). The optimized model (parity, age at menarche, menopause, and first full-term pregnancy) estimated AUC values of 0.872 to 0.876 and 21- to 23-fold increase in OR (BRCA1 heterozygotes) and AUC values of 0.857 to 0.867 and 40- to 41-fold increase (BRCA2 heterozygotes). The combination of PRS with age, family history, and hormonal factors significantly improved the EOC risk discrimination ability. However, the contribution of the PRS was small. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess if combined-PRS models could provide information to inform risk-reducing decisions.

6Papers
13Collaborators