Niccolò Gallio

Oncolytic Viruses in Ovarian Cancer: Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with limited effective treatment options. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for cancer treatment, capable of selectively infecting and lysing cancer cells while stimulating anti-tumor immune responses. Preclinical studies have demonstrated significant tumor regression and prolonged survival in OC models using various OVs, such as herpes simplex. Early-phase clinical trials have shown a favorable safety profile, though the impact on patient survival has been modest. Current research focuses on combining OVs with other treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance their efficacy. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions for utilizing OVs in the management of OC.

Targeting TOP2A in Ovarian Cancer: Biological and Clinical Implications

The enzyme topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) plays a critical role in DNA replication and cell proliferation, making it a promising target for cancer therapy. In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), TOP2A overexpression is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to conventional treatments. This review explores the biological functions of TOP2A in EOC and discusses its potential as a therapeutic target. We highlight studies on the mechanisms through which TOP2A contributes to tumor progression and recurrence. Additionally, we evaluate the clinical implications of targeting TOP2A, including the use of TOP2A inhibitors and their combination with novel drugs. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions for targeting TOP2A in the management of EOC.

Human papillomavirus genotyping in high‐grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: A multicentric Italian study

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in a large cohort of high‐grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) (vaginal HSIL, VaIN2/3) patients from two Italian referral centers. We included all patients with histologically confirmed VaIN2/3 from the Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy, and Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy, between 2003 and 2022. After the histological evaluation of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples, we performed HPV genotyping with VisionArray HPV Chip 1.0. We detected HPV DNA in 94.4% of VaIN2/3 (168/178), with HPV 16 as the most prevalent genotype, accounting for 51.8% of all infections, 41.2% of VaIN2 and 77.6% of VaIN3 cases. Other frequent genotypes were HPV 58 (8.3%, 10.9% of VaIN2 and 2.0% of VaIN3), HPV 73 (5.4%, 5.0% of VaIN2 and 6.1% of VaIN3), and HPV 31 (5.4%, 6.7% of VaIN2 and 2.0% of VaIN3). 73.2% of VaIN2/3 had a single HPV genotype infection and 26.8% a multiple infection (20.8% a double infection, 4.8% a triple infection, and 1.2% a quadruple infection). Single infection was more frequently present in VaIN3 than VaIN2 (81.6% vs. 69.8%). 69.1% of single infections and 73.3% of multiple infections had one or more genotypes covered by nine‐valent HPV vaccine. HPV vaccination is expected to have a large impact on reducing the incidence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia long‐term follow up and prognostic factors: An analysis of a large historical cohort

AbstractIntroductionDifferentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a high‐risk preinvasive vulvar lesion and precursor of human papillomavirus‐independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Due to its rarity, literature data on its malignant potential are scant. The aim of the study is to assess the risk of developing VSCC in patients surgically treated for dVIN not associated with VSCC (solitary dVIN) and the risk of VSCC recurrence in patients treated for dVIN associated with VSCC (dVIN‐VSCC) at first diagnosis.Material and methodsA historical cohort study was performed in a northern Italy referral center for vulvar neoplasms. All consecutive women surgically treated for histologically confirmed dVIN from 1994 to 2021 were collected. Primary outcome was cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk, secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with VSCC development or recurrence. Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test were used to estimate cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk differences and uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with VSCC development in solitary dVIN and recurrence of dVIN‐VSCC.ResultsSeventy‐six patients with dVIN at preoperative biopsy were included: at excisional specimens 44 were solitary dVIN and 32 were dVIN‐VSCC. The absolute risk of VSCC development after solitary dVIN treatment was 43.2% with median time to to VSCC diagnosis of 25.4 months (range 3.5–128.0 months). VSCC recurrence absolute risk in treated dVIN‐VSCC patients was 31.3% with median time to VSCC recurrence of 52.9 months (range 6.5–94.8 months). At uni‐ and multivariate regression analyses, only compliant topical ultrapotent corticosteroid treatment after solitary dVIN excision showed an ability to prevent VSCC development. No protective effect by corticosteroid treatment was shown for VSCC recurrence in dVIN‐VSCC patients. Smoking was associated with higher cancer recurrence risk in dVIN‐VSCC patients on both uni‐ and multivariate regression analyses.ConclusionsPatients with dVIN have a high risk of developing both primary and recurring VSCC. Early recognition, long‐term follow up, and compliant ultrapotent topical corticosteroid treatment are recommended.

Recent advances in treating female genital human papillomavirus related neoplasms with topical imiquimod

AbstractHuman papillomavirus (HPV) encompasses a group of viruses that infect the skin and mucous membranes. In the presence of certain factors, persistent infection with high‐risk HPVs can trigger a process of neoplastic transformation. Imiquimod is a topical agent that acts as a Toll‐like receptor 7/8 agonist, stimulating the innate and adaptive immune system to exert antitumor and antiviral effects. It has been approved for the treatment of various skin conditions, however, its efficacy and safety in the management of HPV‐related‐neoplasms of the lower genital tract, such as vulvar, vaginal, and cervical neoplasia, are still under investigation. This review summarizes the current evidence on the use of imiquimod for the treatment of HPV‐induced lesions of the female lower genital tract, focusing on its indications, mechanisms of action, outcomes, and predictors of response.

Is There a Place for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar Neoplasms? A State of the Art Review

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare neoplasm, usually arising in postmenopausal women, although human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated VC usually develop in younger women. Incidences of VCs are rising in many countries. Surgery is the cornerstone of early-stage VC management, whereas therapies for advanced VC are multimodal and not standardized, combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy to avoid exenterative surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce due to the rarity of the disease and prognosis has not improved. Hence, new therapies are needed to improve the outcomes of these patients. In recent years, improved knowledge regarding the crosstalk between neoplastic and tumor cells has allowed researchers to develop a novel therapeutic approach exploiting these molecular interactions. Both the innate and adaptive immune systems play a key role in anti-tumor immunesurveillance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in multiple tumor types, improving survival rates and disease outcomes. In some gynecologic cancers (e.g., cervical cancer), many studies are showing promising results and a growing interest is emerging about the potential use of ICIs in VC. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the latest developments in the field of VC immunoncology, to present the role of state-of-the-art ICIs in VC management and to discuss new potential immunotherapeutic approaches.