Monica D Levine

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging

To compare outcomes after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer incorporating 2018 Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging. A retrospective analysis. A single teaching hospital. Patients after radical hysterectomy for stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, IA2, or IB1 squamous, adenosquamous, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix between 2007 and 2018, mirroring the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial criteria. The use of MIS surgery for performing radical hysterectomy. The outcomes were compared between patients undergoing MIS vs open approaches. A total of 126 patients met the inclusion criteria. The approach was open in 44 patients (35%) and MIS in 82 patients (65%); 49% were laparoscopic and 51% were robotic. Distribution based on the 2009 FIGO staging showed 1 stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, 15 stage IA2, and 110 stage IB1 patients. Although not statistically significant, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in the open compared to the MIS group (95% vs 87%; p = .17), and the overall survival was higher in the open compared to the MIS group (97% vs 92%; p = .25). Fourteen patients whose disease recurred were Stage IB1 by FIGO 2009 staging; 11/14 were reclassified to a higher stage by 2018 FIGO staging (5/5 open, 6/9 MIS). Adjuvant therapy was recommended for all these patients based on the Sedlis criteria (10/14) or other risk factors (4/14). Despite this, only 1/9 of MIS patients whose disease recurred received adjuvant therapy compared with 3/5 patients whose disease recurred in the open group (p = .05). In a cohort of patients similar to that of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial, 2018 FIGO staging may be useful to refine indications for MIS radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. However, disparate outcomes between MIS and open approaches may be explained by differences in compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for adjuvant therapy.

The modified 5-item frailty index is a predictor of post-operative complications in vulvar cancer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

To determine whether frailty is associated with post-operative complications following surgery for vulvar cancer. This retrospective study used a multi-institutional dataset from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2014-2020) to analyze the relationship between frailty, procedure type, and post-operative complications. Frailty was determined using the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5). Univariate and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. Of 886 women, 49.9% underwent radical vulvectomy alone, and 19.5% and 30.6% underwent concurrent unilateral or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, respectively; 24.5% had mFI ≥2 and were considered frail. Compared with non-frail women, those with an mFI ≥2 were more likely to have an unplanned readmission (12.9% vs 7.8%, p=0.02), wound disruption (8.3% vs 4.2%, p=0.02), and deep surgical site infection (3.7% vs 1.4%, p=0.04). On multivariable-adjusted models, frailty was a significant predictor for minor (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.30) and any complications (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.08). Specifically, for radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, frailty was significantly associated with major (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.40) and any complications (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.87). In this analysis of the NSQIP database, nearly 25% of women undergoing radical vulvectomy were considered frail. Frailty was associated with increased post-operative complications, especially in women concurrently undergoing bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Frailty screening prior to radical vulvectomy may assist in patient counseling and improve post-operative outcomes.