Investigator
Tokai University
Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted a retrospective multi-institutional survey of patients who underwent cervical conization in Japan. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for positive surgical margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) patients after therapeutic cervical conization and those for positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence and did not undergo additional treatment. In 2009 and 2013, 14,832 patients underwent cervical conization at 205 institutions in Japan. Of these, 8856 patients who underwent therapeutic conization fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their histologic findings and clinical outcomes were evaluated based on standard statistical procedures and clinical and demographic characteristics. Negative and positive margins were observed in 7,585 and 1,271 (14.4%) patients, respectively. The predictors of positive margins were menopausal status (p<0.001), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (p<0.001), and Shimodaira-Taniguchi (S-T) conization (p<0.001). Of 1,271 patients with positive margins, 1,060 underwent no additional treatment; among those 1,060 patients, 129 (12.2%) experienced recurrence. The predictors of positive margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence were age, parity, gravidity, S-T conization, and laser scalpel conization. Menopausal status and treatment procedures were associated with positive margins after therapeutic conization of CIN 3. It is important to understand the characteristics of treatment procedures and select an appropriate procedure for each case. For elderly or menopausal patients with positive margins, immediate additional treatment is recommended.
Validation of the 2023 FIGO staging system and its concordance with the JSGO guidelines in endometrial cancer: A multi‐institutional retrospective study in Japan
Abstract Aim To validate the prognostic accuracy of the 2023 FIGO staging system and assess its alignment with the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines for endometrial cancer treatment. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 1207 patients with endometrial cancer treated at four academic hospitals in Kanagawa, Japan, between 2018 and 2022. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO 2023 system and the JSGO recurrence risk categories. Primary endpoints included stage migration, recurrence risk (RR), overall survival (OS), and concordance between the two classification systems. Results Under FIGO 2023, the stage distribution was: I, 741 (61.4%); II, 203 (16.8%); III, 149 (12.3%); and IV, 114 (9.4%), with stage migration observed in 36.3% of cases. The FIGO 2023 system provided clearer stratification of 3‐year RR than FIGO 2009, with the RR gap widening from 80.0% to 90.1%. Sixteen patients (3.5%) with stage IA3 were classified as high risk by JSGO criteria, while 14.4% of patients considered high risk by JSGO were downstaged under FIGO 2023. Additionally, 46 patients (19.6%) with FIGO stage IA were reclassified as intermediate risk owing to focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Substantial LVSI was significantly associated with recurrence and poor prognosis (3‐year OS rates: none 94.3%, focal 89.9%, and substantial 40.7%; p < 0.05). Molecular testing was limited: p53 in 30.2%, MSI in 5.9%, and POLE was not available. Conclusions FIGO 2023 improves prognostic precision. Incorporating LVSI extent and molecular data may refine JSGO classifications and support more individualized adjuvant therapy strategies.
