Min-Jung Kwon

Clinical practice guideline for high-risk human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: a consensus statement from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, and hrHPV testing has increasingly been recognized as an effective screening tool that overcomes the limitations of cytology-based screening. However, standardized clinical guidance for the use of hrHPV testing in cervical cancer screening has been limited in Korea, resulting in variability in clinical practice. This consensus-based clinical practice guideline was developed under the auspices of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology through multidisciplinary collaboration involving experts in gynecology, pathology, laboratory medicine, and public health. Relevant domestic and international evidence was systematically reviewed, and input from diverse clinical settings was incorporated through four public hearings. Final recommendations were established through expert consensus. The guideline presents four key recommendations: hrHPV testing may be considered for women aged 25 years or older, with a recommended screening interval of 3 to <5 years; screening assays should differentiate HPV genotypes 16 and 18 and detect other high-risk types, with preference given to clinically validated tests; testing should be performed in appropriately equipped settings with standardized specimen handling and reporting, including documentation of HPV 16/18 status in positive cases; and hrHPV testing should be conducted under rigorous internal and external quality control systems. This guideline aims to support consistent and rational implementation of hrHPV testing in cervical cancer screening in Korea.

Performance evaluation of the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay in comparison with the Cobas HPV test for high-risk HPV genotyping

Molecular testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotypes is important in screening for cervical cancer. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a newly developed Allplex HPV HR Detection assay in comparison with the Cobas HPV Test. A total of 1,275 cervical specimens obtained from a healthcare center between August 2021 and May 2022 were analyzed. The overall agreement for hrHPV detection was 98.4%, with higher agreement observed for HPV-16 (99.7%) and HPV-18 (99.8%) compared to other hrHPV genotypes (97.2%). Sequencing revealed that the majority of discrepancies was genotyped accurately by the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay with the exception of one false positive for HPV-16 and two false positives for other hrHPV genotypes. The Allplex HPV HR Detection assay showed almost perfect agreement with the Cobas HPV test, emphasizing its utility in hrHPV screening and monitoring.

Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a leading cause of cervical cancer, of which human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and HPV-18 account for about 70% of cases. Since HPV infection is common, it is important to focus on the HPV genotypes that pose the highest risk for effective cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening. A total of 86,022 women aged 25 years or older was analyzed in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HPV genotyping and cytology were analyzed. In addition, we subdivided participants into two groups according to cytology results, negative for intraepithelial lesion of malignancy (NILM) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and analyzed absolute risk (AR) and relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or worse according to HPV genotype. The AR of CIN 3 or worse was 77.0 times higher in HR-HPV-positive compared to HR-HPV-negative. Compared to 12 other HR-HPV-positive, the AR of CIN 3 or worse was 4.2 times higher in HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 positive. This finding was more evident in women with NILM than in women with ASC-US. The RR of CIN 3 or worse was 7.0 in women with NILM and 4.5 in women with ASC-US. Regardless of the cytology results, the risk of CIN 3 or worse was higher in HPV-16/HPV-18 than in other HR-HPV. HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping is recommended to screen women with a high risk of cervical cancer.