Investigator

Michelle Lockley

Consultant in Medical Oncology · University College Hospital, oncology

MLMichelle Lockley
Papers(5)
Adaptive Therapy Expl…Re: ‘Can we replace a…The avoiding late dia…The Genomic Landscape…Study protocol for Ad…
Collaborators(10)
Helen HockingsIain A. McNeishTrevor A. GrahamNikolina BakaliPhilip SmithRanjit ManchandaRowan E MillerSue PhilpottThomas BradleyUma Anne Mukherjee
Institutions(8)
Queen Mary University…Imperial College Lond…University of Cambrid…Wolfson Institute of …Aintree University Ho…University College Lo…Cancer Research UK Ca…Unknown Institution

Papers

Adaptive Therapy Exploits Fitness Deficits in Chemotherapy-Resistant Ovarian Cancer to Achieve Long-Term Tumor Control

Abstract Drug resistance results in poor outcomes for patients with cancer. Adaptive therapy is a potential strategy to address drug resistance that exploits competitive interactions between sensitive and resistant subclones. In this study, we showed that adapting carboplatin dose according to tumor response (adaptive therapy) significantly prolonged survival of murine ovarian cancer models compared with standard carboplatin dosing, without increasing mean daily drug dose or toxicity. Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells exhibited diminished fitness when drug was absent in vitro and in vivo, which caused selective decline of resistant populations due to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis. Conversely, fitter, sensitive cells regrew when drug was withdrawn. Using a bioinformatics pipeline that exploits copy number changes to quantify the emergence of treatment resistance, analysis of cell-free DNA obtained longitudinally from patients with ovarian cancer during treatment showed subclonal selection through therapy, and measurements of resistant population growth correlated strongly with disease burden. These preclinical findings pave the way for future clinical testing of personalized adaptive therapy regimens tailored to the evolution of carboplatin resistance in individual patients with ovarian cancer. Significance: Carboplatin adaptive therapy improves treatment efficacy without increasing daily dose due to reduced fitness of drug-resistant populations, which can be tracked using cfDNA and could direct adaptive therapy in future clinical trials. See related commentary by Gatenby, p. 3373

The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants inBRCA1andBRCA2

BackgroundOur study aimed to establish ‘real-world’ performance and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer (OC) surveillance in women with pathogenic germlineBRCA1/2variants who defer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO).MethodsOur study recruited 875 femaleBRCA1/2-heterozygotes at 13 UK centres and via an online media campaign, with 767 undergoing at least one 4-monthly surveillance test with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test. Surveillance performance was calculated with modelling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using Markov population cohort simulation.ResultsOur study identified 8 OCs during 1277 women screen years: 2 occult OCs at RRSO (both stage 1a), and 6 screen-detected; 3 of 6 (50%) were ≤stage 3a and 5 of 6 (83%) were completely surgically cytoreduced. Modelled sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for OC were 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3 to 99.7), 99.9% (99.9–100), 75% (34.9–96.8) and 99.9% (99.9–100), respectively. The predicted number of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained by surveillance was 0.179 with an ICER cost-saving of -£102,496/QALY.ConclusionOC surveillance for women deferring RRSO in a ‘real-world’ setting is feasible and demonstrates similar performance to research trials; it down-stages OC, leading to a high complete cytoreduction rate and is cost-saving in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. While RRSO remains recommended management, ROCA-based surveillance may be considered for femaleBRCA-heterozygotes who are deferring such surgery.

The Genomic Landscape of Early-Stage Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma

Abstract Purpose: Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is usually diagnosed at late stage. We investigated whether late-stage HGSC has unique genomic characteristics consistent with acquisition of evolutionary advantage compared with early-stage tumors. Experimental Design: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) on pretreatment samples from 43 patients with FIGO stage I–IIA HGSC to investigate somatic mutations and copy-number (CN) alterations (SCNA). We compared results to pretreatment samples from 52 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC from the BriTROC-1 study. Results: Age of diagnosis did not differ between early-stage and late-stage patients (median 61.3 years vs. 62.3 years, respectively). TP53 mutations were near-universal in both cohorts (89% early-stage, 100% late-stage), and there were no significant differences in the rates of other somatic mutations, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. We also did not observe cohort-specific focal SCNA that could explain biological behavior. However, ploidy was higher in late-stage (median, 3.0) than early-stage (median, 1.9) samples. CN signature exposures were significantly different between cohorts, with greater relative signature 3 exposure in early-stage and greater signature 4 in late-stage. Unsupervised clustering based on CN signatures identified three clusters that were prognostic. Conclusions: Early-stage and late-stage HGSCs have highly similar patterns of mutation and focal SCNA. However, CN signature analysis showed that late-stage disease has distinct signature exposures consistent with whole-genome duplication. Further analyses will be required to ascertain whether these differences reflect genuine biological differences between early-stage and late-stage or simply time-related markers of evolutionary fitness. See related commentary by Yang et al., p. 2730

Study protocol for Adaptive ChemoTherapy for Ovarian cancer (ACTOv): a multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of adaptive therapy (AT) with carboplatin, based on changes in CA125, in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer

Introduction Adaptive ChemoTherapy for Ovarian cancer (ACTOv) is a phase II, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, evaluating an adaptive therapy (AT) regimen with carboplatin in women with relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum whose disease has progressed at least 6 months after day 1 of the last cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy. AT is a novel, evolutionarily informed approach to cancer treatment, which aims to exploit intratumoral competition between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tumour subpopulations by modulating drug dose according to a patient’s own response to the last round of treatment. ACTOv is the first clinical trial of AT in this disease setting. Methods and analysis 80 patients will be randomised 1:1 to standard therapy (control) or AT (investigational) arms. The starting and maximum carboplatin dose in both arms is area under the curve (AUC) ×5 according to absolute nuclear medicine glomerular filtration rate. The AT regimen will modify the carboplatin dose according to changes in the serum biomarker CA125, a proxy measure of total tumour burden. Patients will receive treatment intravenously every 21 days for a maximum of 6 and 12 cycles in the control and investigational arms, respectively. The primary endpoint is modified progression-free survival (investigator-assessed using RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Cancers) compared with the baseline prerandomisation scan rather than the radiological nadir), clinical progression or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints will include acceptability, deliverability, compliance, toxicity, CA125, quality of life and overall survival. ACTOv is open to National Health Service hospitals throughout the UK, recruitment is anticipated to take 36 months across 10 sites and will be managed by the Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre. Ethics and dissemination The trial has been reviewed and received approval from the London—Dulwich Research Ethics Committee (REC). Results of the trial will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number NCT05080556 .

56Works
5Papers
39Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsApoptosisCarcinoma, Endometrioid

Positions

2015–

Consultant in Medical Oncology

University College Hospital · oncology

2009–

Professor of Medical Oncology

Queen Mary University of London · Barts Cancer Institute

2009–

Consultant in Medical Oncology

Barts Health NHS Trust · Oncology