Michalis Liontos

Possible Prognostic Role of BMI Before Chemotherapy in the Outcomes of Women with Ovarian Cancer

Background/Objectives: Survival rates for ovarian cancer remain distressingly low. Despite established prognostic factors, the need to identify modifiable parameters to influence survival outcomes is imperative. Overweight and obesity, both prevalent conditions, have been implicated in cancer development and potentially poor survival. However, conflicting data on the associations of body mass index (BMI) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer patients necessitate further exploration. This study aims to investigate the prognostic role of BMI before chemotherapy in women with ovarian cancer, specifically focusing on PFS and OS. Methods: A retrospective analysis encompassed 1,136 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas between 1995 and 2018. Patients were categorized based on BMI at presentation, and a comprehensive examination of clinicopathological, treatment, and survival data was conducted. Results: In the patient population, normal weight patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2) demonstrated a median PFS of 12.8 months (95% CI 11.7–13.9 months), while overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) exhibited a significantly longer median PFS of 14.9 months (95% CI 13.6–16.4 months, P = 0.006). No statistically significant difference was noted in median OS between the two BMI groups. Subgroup analysis for different histological subtypes revealed a statistically significant benefit for overweight and obese patients with serous and endometrioid histology (mPFS 12.9 months, 95% CI 11.7–14.0 vs. 15.6 months, 95% CI 13.9–17.3, P = 0.012 and 14.6 months 95% CI 13.7–15.5 vs. 25.6 months, 95% CI 9.5–41.7, P = 0.031, respectively). Additionally, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 demonstrated a significant advantage in advanced-stage disease. Conclusions: The study underscores the intricate association between BMI and ovarian cancer prognosis. While a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival was noted between normal weight and overweight/obese patients, with the latter group experiencing a survival benefit, no such difference was observed in overall survival.

The Impact of Positive Peritoneal Cytology on the Survival Rates of Early-Stage-Disease Endometrial Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The impact of positive peritoneal cytology has been a matter of controversy in early-stage endometrial cancer for several years. The latest staging systems do not take into consideration its presence; however, emerging evidence about its potential harmful effect on patient survival outcomes suggests otherwise. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to accumulate current evidence. Materials and Methods: Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles. Effect sizes were calculated in Rstudio using the meta function. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the possibility of small-study effects and p-hacking. Trial sequential analysis was used to evaluate the adequacy of the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: Fifteen articles were finally included in the present systematic review that involved 19,255 women with early-stage endometrial cancer. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale indicated that the majority of included studies had a moderate risk of bias in their selection of participants, a moderate risk of bias in terms of the comparability of groups (positive peritoneal cytology vs. negative peritoneal cytology) and a low risk of bias concerning the assessment of the outcome. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that women with early-stage endometrial cancer and positive peritoneal cytology had significantly lower 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazards ratio (HR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.09, 0.71). As a result of the decreased recurrence-free survival, patients with positive peritoneal cytology also exhibited reduced 5-year overall survival outcomes (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27, 0.92). The overall survival of the included patients was considerably higher among those that did not have positive peritoneal cytology (HR 12.76, 95% CI 2.78, 58.51). Conclusions: Positive peritoneal cytology seems to be a negative prognostic indicator of survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. Considering the absence of data related to the molecular profile of patients, further research is needed to evaluate if this factor should be reinstituted in future staging systems.

What Has Changed in the Management of Uterine Serous Carcinomas? Two Decades of Experience

Uterine serous carcinoma accounts for 3–10% of endometrial cancers, but it is the most lethal histopathological subtype. The molecular characterization of endometrial carcinomas has allowed novel therapeutic approaches for these patients. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with uterine serous carcinomas treated in our hospital within the last two decades to identify possible changes in their management. The patients and their characteristics were evenly distributed across the two decades. Treatment modalities did not change significantly throughout this period. After adjuvant treatment, patients’ median disease-free survival was 42.07 months (95% CI: 20.28–63.85), and it did not differ significantly between the two decades (p = 0.059). The median overall survival was 47.51 months (95% Cl: 32.18–62.83), and it significantly favored the first decade’s patients (p = 0.024). In patients with de novo metastatic or recurrent disease, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95% Cl: 5.81–9.93), whereas both the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival of these patients did not show any significant improvement during the examined time period. Overall, the results of our study explore the minor changes in respect of uterine serous carcinoma’s treatment over the last two decades, which are reflected in the survival outcomes of these patients and consequently underline the critical need for therapeutic advances in the near future.

Molecular Profiling and Treatment Outcomes in Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Prognostic Role of Estrogen Receptor Expression

Background: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) represents a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer, accounting for a disproportionate number of disease-related deaths. Although molecular classification has improved risk stratification, prognostic heterogeneity highlights the need for new prognostic markers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with USC treated at our institution between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2023. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies, molecular biomarkers accessed by immunohistology (TP53, ER, PR, HER2, and MMR status), and survival outcomes were collected. Patients were first staged by FIGO 2009 and retrospectively reclassified by FIGO 2023. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: The majority of patients were presented with advanced disease (FIGO stage IIIC-IV). TP53 mutations were found in 88% of cases, HER2 amplification in 18%, and ER expression in 57.8%. ER-positive patients showed significantly improved DFS in the adjuvant setting compared with ER-negative patients, whereas no significant associations were observed for first-line PFS or OS in multivariable analyses. HER2 amplification was not associated with inferior survival in our cohort. The advanced stage remained an independent predictor of worse OS. Conclusions: USC is a biologically heterogeneous disease, and its treatment should be guided by its molecular profile. ER expression identifies a subset of patients with improved DFS, suggesting potential prognostic relevance in this high-risk histology.

Molecular Prognostic Factors in Uterine Serous Carcinomas: A Systematic Review

Uterine serous carcinomas are an aggressive minority of endometrial cancers. They are characterized by mutations in TP53 and extensive copy number alterations and are primarily classified in the copy number-high/p53abn molecular prognostic group, highlighting a unique molecular profile that is crucial for understanding their behavior and treatment responses. Clinical studies have shown that molecular categorization via biomarkers can facilitate proper treatment selection, and this is now widely used. In this context, the scope of this systematic review is to identify molecular characteristics with prognostic significance for these neoplasms to further inform on their treatment needs. We performed a comprehensive literature search of all articles written in English using the PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases through February 2025. Our review led to the inclusion of 95 studies, from which we identified a total of 66 distinct molecular characteristics along with new cancer signatures that may impact prognosis. These findings have the potential to inform clinical practice by aiding in the development of tailored treatment strategies for patients with uterine serous carcinoma, ultimately improving outcomes in this challenging malignancy.

Pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide in heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely implemented in the treatment of solid tumors. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) compounds, and poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP) are under evaluation in ovarian cancer. We aim to explore the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. This was a retrospective study of all patients who received pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent platinum-resistant heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer in the Oncology Unit of Alexandra University Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (SD 9.2; range 37-72). All patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Initial disease stage was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC in most cases (11/15, 73%). Patients were heavily pre-treated with a median of six (range 4-9) prior lines of systemic therapy. All patients experienced disease progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and median progression-free survival on first-line treatment was 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). Patients received a median of four cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (range 3-20). Overall response rate was 13% (2/15) and disease control rate was 33% (5/15) with two patients achieving partial response and three patients achieving stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3 to 5.7) and the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 20%. Treatment was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. We showed that the combination of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide is an effective alternative in heavily pre-treated patients with ovarian cancer who have otherwise limited treatment options.

BRCA1/2 Mutation Types Do Not Affect Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer Patients

Background: High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most lethal type of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations as high as 20%. Our objective is to determine whether the location of mutations in the different domains of the BRCA1/2 genes affects the clinical outcome of HGSOC patients. Methods: A total of 51 women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated ovarian cancer were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: In our study cohort, 35 patients were carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 and 16 in BRCA2. The median PFS time following completion of the primary therapy was 23.8 months (95% CI 20.1–27.5) and the median OS was 92.9 months (95% CI 69.8–116.1) in all BRCA carriers. After multivariate analysis, no significant association among the location or type of BRCA1/2 mutation with PFS or OS was identified. Notably, significant differences in PFS between carriers of identical mutations in the same BRCA gene were detected. Conclusions: Among HGSOC patients, BRCA1/2 carriers with mutations in different locations of the genes show no significant difference in survival outcomes, in terms of PFS and OS, suggesting the potential effect of other genetic abnormalities and co-contributing risk factors.

Microsatellite Instability Is Insufficiently Used as a Biomarker for Lynch Syndrome Testing in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE The pan-cancer presence of microsatellite instability (MSI)–positive tumors demonstrates its clinical utility as an agnostic biomarker for identifying immunotherapy-eligible patients. Additionally, MSI is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS), the most prevalent cancer susceptibility syndrome among patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer. Therefore, MSI-high results should inform germline genetic testing for cancer-predisposing genes. However, in clinical practice, such analysis is frequently disregarded. METHODS A next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based technique was used for MSI analysis in 4,553 patients with various tumor types. Upon request, somatic BRAF gene analysis was conducted. In addition, hereditary testing of cancer-associated genes was performed in MSI-high cases using a capture-based NGS protocol. MLH1 promoter methylation analysis was conducted retrospectively in patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer to further investigate the origin of MSI at the tumor level. RESULTS The MSI positivity rate for the entire cohort was 5.27%. Endometrial, gastric, colorectal, urinary tract, and prostate cancers showed the highest proportion of MSI-high cases (15.69%, 8.54%, 7.40%, 4.55%, and 3.19%, respectively). A minority of 45 patients (22.73%) among the MSI-high cases underwent germline testing to determine whether the mismatch repair pathway deficiency was inherited. 24.44% of those who performed the genetic test carried a pathogenic variant in an LS-associated gene. Three MSI-high individuals had non-LS gene alterations, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and CDKN2A pathogenic variants, indicating the presence of non–LS-associated gene alterations among MSI-high patients. CONCLUSION Although MSI analysis is routinely performed in clinical practice, as many as 77% of MSI-high patients do not undergo LS genetic testing, despite international guidelines strongly recommending it. BRAF and MLH1 methylation analysis could shed light on the somatic origin of MSI in 42.50% of the MSI-high patients; however, MLH1 analysis is barely ever requested in clinical practice.