Investigator

Melpomeni Kountouri

University Hospital Of Geneva

MKMelpomeni Kountou…
Papers(2)
Progression-free surv…Progression-free surv…
Collaborators(5)
Jose Manuel Estrada-L…Ramon YarzaA. BarquínGiuseppe CarusoJudith R Kroep
Institutions(5)
University Hospital O…Hospital Universitari…Hospital Universitari…European Institute of…Leiden University Med…

Papers

Progression-free survival as a surrogate of overall survival in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: an EORTC gynecologic cancer group study.

The value of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker for overall survival remains a matter of debate. Herein, we evaluated the validity of progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standardized treatment effects (z-scores) for progression-free-survival and overall survival were derived from reported HRs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and surrogate threshold effect (STE) were calculated to assess surrogacy according to German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care guidelines. Sub-group analyses were performed by treatment modality, line of therapy, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Sixteen randomized trials encompassing 25 treatment comparisons and 10,381 patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer were included. A strong correlation was observed between z Progression-free survival shows a strong but context-dependent correlation with overall survival among endometrial cancer trials. While it may serve as a valid surrogate marker, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, its reliability varies by treatment context. These findings support the selective use of progression-free survival as a surrogate in endometrial cancer and underscore the importance of tailored endpoint strategies in oncology trial design.

Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate end point for overall survival in advanced cervical carcinoma

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to study the potential of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for trials evaluating the use of systemic therapy in advanced cervical cancer. We performed a systematic review selecting phase II and III randomized trials including locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer, with mature progression-free survival and overall survival data. Our study adhered to the Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405604). Exclusions comprised trials involving adjuvant treatment as the primary end point. The magnitude of progression-free survival and overall survival was assessed using standardized z-scores. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment type, line of treatment, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Surrogacy was evaluated according to the recommendations by the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. In the overall population, a moderate correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival was observed (r = 0.75, p < .001). The surrogate threshold effect (STE) indicated a threshold for progression-free survival z-score (z-progression-free survival of 2.53), intersecting with null overall survival outcome (z = 1.96). Subgroup analysis revealed a weak and nonsignificant correlation in chemotherapy trials (r = 0.5, p = .12) with a higher STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.83). Conversely, chemoimmunotherapy combinations exhibited a robust and statistically significant correlation (r = 0.99, p = 0.01) with a lower STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.39). Trials exploring advanced therapy lines demonstrated a higher and more significant correlation (r = 0.98, p = .02) with a lower STE at 2.08, whereas upfront-line therapy trials showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.67, p = 0.01) with an STE magnitude of 2.58. Progression-free survival exhibits a moderate correlation with a modest STE. For chemoimmunotherapy combinations, there is a strong correlation between overall survival and progression-free survival, with a notably lower STE. This suggests that the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival may vary significantly based on the treatment strategy.

2Works
2Papers
5Collaborators