Investigator

Mehmet Gökçü

Ass. Proff. Head of Obs&Gyc Department · İzmir University of Economics, Faculty of medicine

About

MGMehmet Gökçü
Papers(2)
High-grade endometria…Analysis of vanishing…
Collaborators(10)
Mehmet Mutlu MeydanliMehmet TunçMuzaffer SancıNurettin BoranOguzhan KuruOzlem Isiksacan OzenSevil SayhanTayfun ToptasTayup SimsekAli Ayhan
Institutions(7)
Izmir UniversityMedical Park Gaziante…Başkent Üniversitesi …University Of Health …Istanbul University-C…Saglik Bilimleri Univ…Akdeniz Üniversitesi

Papers

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma versus undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a Turkish uterine sarcoma group study-001

Prognostic factors associated with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) have not been distinctly determined due to the repetitive changes in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with HGESS with those of patients with UUS. A multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study was conducted including 71 patients, who underwent surgery at 13 centers from 2008 to 2017. An experienced gynecopathologist from each institution re-evaluated the slides of their own cases according to the WHO The median disease-free survival (DFS) for HGESS and UUS was 12 months and 6 months, respectively. While the median overall survival was not reached in HGESS group, it was 22 months in the UUS group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that patients with UUS had a significantly poorer DFS than those with HGESS (p = 0.016), although OS did not differ between the groups (p = 0.135). Lymphovascular-space involvement (LVSI) was the sole significant factor associated with progression, recurrence or death for HGESS (Hazard ratio: 9.353, 95% confidence interval: 2.539-34.457, p = 0.001), whereas no significant independent factor was found for UUS. UUS has a more aggressive behavior than HGESS. While no significant predictor of prognosis was found for UUS, LVSI is the sole independent prognostic factor for HGESS, with patients 9.3 times more likely to experience refractory/progressive disease, recurrence or death.

Analysis of vanishing endometrial cancer by pathological types

AbstractPurposeWe asked why endometrial cancer sometimes vanishes.MethodsA total of 454 patients diagnosed with endometrioid‐type endometrial cancer (EC) (via endometrial sampling) and treated in our clinic over the past 5 years were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: vanishing and residual, depending on whether a tumor was detected in the postoperative hysterectomy specimen. Patient age, numbers of pregnancies and deliveries, menopausal status, systemic disease status, hemogram parameters, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, and invasion status (evident on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were compared between the groups.ResultsECs vanished in 42 (9.25%) patients. The vanishing rates were 19.7% (37/187) in FIGO grade 1 patients, 2.1% (5/238) in grade 2 patients, and 0% (0/29) in grade 3 patients. The average age was lower in the vanishing than the residual group, but the premenopausal status and grade 1 tumor rates were higher (both p < 0.001). An absence of invasion (as revealed by MRI) was more common in the vanishing group (p < 0.001). No recurrence developed in the vanishing group, but recurrences were noted in 3.3% (14/412) of the residual group. There were no significant between‐group differences in any of the numbers of pregnancies or births, systemic disease status, or hemogram parameters (all p > 0.05).ConclusionVanishing EC is more likely in premenopausal women with endometrioid grade 1 EC (as revealed by endometrial biopsy) who lack myometrial invasion on MRI.

11Works
2Papers
15Collaborators

Positions

2021–

Ass. Proff. Head of Obs&Gyc Department

İzmir University of Economics · Faculty of medicine

2018–

Chief of Gynecologic Oncology Department,

TC Sağlık Bakanlığı İzmir İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü İzmir Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · gynecologic oncology

2005–

Gynecologic Oncology Surgeon

TC Sağlık Bakanlığı İzmir İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü İzmir Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · gynecologic oncology

2001–

gynecology doctor

Ankara Etlik Dogumevi ve Kadin Hastaliklari Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi

Education

2001

resident

Ankara Etlik Dogumevi ve Kadin Hastaliklari Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi

1996

student

Hacettepe Üniversitesi T?p Fakültesi

Links & IDs
0000-0002-3187-2317

Scopus: 6504303111

Researcher Id: V-6649-2017