Mayu Yunokawa

Laparoscopy-assisted laterally extended endopelvic resection and sacrectomy (beyond laterally extended endopelvic resection) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) is a surgical option for patients with laterally recurrent gynecological malignancies to preserve sciatic nerve function [1]. However, when a laterally recurrent tumor involves the sacrum, debulking surgery is generally abandoned because the surgical excision line is outside the standard LEER. Since its technical feasibility and oncological safety have been demonstrated, sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer is now considered the treatment of choice [2]. Theoretically, if complete resection is deemed possible, LEER and sacrectomy (beyond-LEER) may be the treatments of choice for recurrent gynecological malignancies. However, the technical feasibility of beyond-LEER has not been reported. In this video, we demonstrate the step-by-step procedure of laparoscopy-assisted beyond-LEER in a patient with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The patient, with stage IVA ovarian cancer, was in complete remission after debulking surgery and chemotherapy. At the 13-month-platinum-free interval, a solitary recurrent tumor, involving the right internal iliac vessels and infiltrating the right sacral foramen (S3), was detected. Thus, second-line chemotherapy was initially introduced. During 6 months of chemotherapy, the tumor size remained unchanged and no other metastatic lesions were detected. Therefore, surgical resection was planned. Laparoscopy-assisted beyond-LEER was performed, and complete resection without tumor exposure was accomplished. No sign of recurrence 9 months post debulking surgery has been noted. This is the first report to demonstrate the technical feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted beyond-LEER. Table 1 presents a comparison with cases wherein open total pelvic exenteration with low-sacrectomy (TPES) was performed for recurrent rectal cancer. Forty-nine cases of open TPES demonstrated operation time, 11.5 hours; blood loss volume, 2,630 mL; and length of stay, 24.5 days [3]. These results are similar to the findings in our case: operation time, 11 hours; blood loss volume, 1,700 mL; and length of stay, 35 days. We suggest that the benefit of laparoscopy cannot be demonstrated because TPES is a different procedure compared with the beyond LEER. Kimura et al. [4] demonstrated that laparoscopic TPES for recurrent rectal cancer might have a benefit of reduced blood loss. The advantages of laparoscopy during our multidirectional procedure include not only the possibility of reducing blood loss but also the quick closure of abdominal wound and ease of keeping wound clean while changing patient's position during sacrectomy. However, due to the limited case and follow up periods, further studies are required to determine the efficacy of this novel surgery and real advantage of laparoscopy. The informed consent for use of this video was taken from the patient.

Current treatment status of older patients with gynecological cancers

Abstract The percentage of older patients with gynecological malignancies has recently been on the rise. Although prospective studies focusing on the treatment of older patients have been conducted for ovarian cancer, mainly in Europe, there have been scarce literature on cervical and endometrial cancers, and information on their treatment is currently lacking. One of the characteristics of older patients is that not only their performance status but also other factors, such as physical, mental and social factors, cause a large variability, and individual differences in their response to treatments. One of the major issues in the treatment of older patients is how to objectively measure these individual differences and link them to the appropriate treatment selection. In this review, clinical evidence for the guided treatment of older patients with gynecological cancer will be reviewed.

Cerebral infarction caused by Trousseau syndrome associated with cervical cancer

The combination of cancer and hypercoagulable states is often called Trousseau syndrome. In particular, cerebral infarction caused by Trousseau syndrome is reported to have a poor prognosis. In gynecology, there are many reports of ovarian cancer and a few of uterine cancer. Since there has been no comprehensive report of Trousseau syndrome in cervical cancer, we aimed to summarize Trousseau syndrome in cervical cancer. Cerebral infarction caused by cancer-related arterial thrombosis was defined as Trousseau syndrome. Patients with cervical cancer diagnosed at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed using the hospital's medical records. A total of 1,432 patients were included in the study. Trousseau syndrome occurred in 6 patients (0.4%). The mean age of patients with Trousseau syndrome was 63 years (range: 53-78 years). Of the 6 patients who developed Trousseau's syndrome, 4 patients had it before or during initial treatment, and 2 during recurrent/relapsed disease treatment. The 4 patients who developed the syndrome before or during initial treatment had advanced disease: 1 in stage IIIC and 3 in stage IVB. In all cases, the disease was associated with progressive distant metastasis. The median survival time from the onset of Trousseau syndrome was 1 month (range: 0-6 months). Cervical cancer causes Trousseau syndrome in cases of advanced disease with a short time between the onset of the syndrome and mortality.

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and platinum chemotherapy in cervical cancer: results of Japanese population from BEATcc

This study analyzed the efficacy of add-on atezolizumab to standard first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in 56 Japanese patients with metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer treated across 8 sites under the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group between October 2018 and August 2021 in the BEATcc trial. Patients were randomized to standard arm (standard therapy: cisplatin 50 mg/m² or carboplatin area under the curve of 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m², and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg) or experimental arm (standard therapy with atezolizumab 1,200 mg). Of 56 patients, 30 were in experimental arm vs. 26, standard arm (age: 53.2±12.9 vs. 54.7±12.2 years). Median progression-free survival was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=10.4-26.1) in experimental arm vs. 11.1 months (8.4-16.5) in standard arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.51; 95% CI=0.26-1.01). Median overall survival was 34.1 months (23.2-38.6) in the experimental arm vs. 31.6 months (16.4-36.5), standard arm (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.23-1.21). Objective response rate was 86.7% in experimental arm vs. 84.6%, standard arm. Complete response and partial response, respectively, were 23.3% and 63.3% in experimental arm and 26.9% and 57.7% in standard arm. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 80.0%, experimental arm and 88.5%, standard arm. Gastrointestinal/genitourinary fistula incidence was lower in Japanese patients (1 patient receiving atezolizumab), likely due to stricter inclusion criteria. Overall, add-on atezolizumab enhances the efficacy of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients as those in overall BEATcc population and could be considered a new first-line treatment option for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer in Japan. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03556839.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial

DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset. In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents. Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.

Pan-Asia adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), published in 2023, was adapted in July 2024, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guideline for the management of Asian patients with EOC. The adapted guideline presented in this manuscript represents the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with EOC representing the oncological societies of China, Indonesia, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand, coordinated by ESMO and the Indian Society of Medical and Pediatric Oncology. Voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the represented countries. Drug access and reimbursement across Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The Pan-Asian consensus aims to guide the optimisation and harmonisation of management of patients with EOC in Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies between countries.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasm

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm are revised from the 2018 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standardized care for uterine body neoplasm, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for uterine body neoplasm, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden on patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO guideline committee, based on a careful review of evidence from the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The main features of the 2023 revision are as follows: 1) The Guidelines Formulation Committee members were asked to understand Minds' medical guideline development method in advance. 2) The clinical question (CQ) was changed to Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format as much as possible. 3) Introduced the "body of evidence," which summarizes the results of research reports collected for the CQs by outcome and study design, and the strength of evidence for each body of evidence was rated from levels A to D. 4) Introduction of systematic reviews in some CQs. 5) The strength of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, value and hope for patients, and clinical applicability were considered while drafting recommendations. Herein, we present the English version of the JSGO guidelines 2023 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm.

The impact of cytoreductive surgery on outcomes in high tumor burden ovarian cancer after induction of PARP inhibitors

In advanced ovarian cancer, achieving R0 resection is a critical strategy for improving prognosis. However, even with R0 resection, the prognosis of patients with a high tumor burden remains poor. This study aimed to assess whether the introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) has enhanced outcomes in such cases. We retrospectively analyzed patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were classified into Group A (pre-PARPi introduction) and Group B (post-PARPi introduction). Complete macroscopic resection was defined as R0. Progression-free survival (PFS), stratified by the Aletti Surgical Complexity Score (Aletti_SCS), was the primary endpoint and was evaluated using Cox regression models. A total of 434 patients were included. In Group A, among those who achieved R0, the median PFS was 23.5 months for patients with high Aletti_SCS (95% confidence interval [CI]=14-30) and not reached for those with low Aletti_SCS (95% CI=30-not reached; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.36, 95% CI=0.20-0.62). In Group B, the median PFS was not reached in both patients with high Aletti_SCS (95% CI=not reached-not reached) and low Aletti_SCS (95% CI=22-not reached; adjusted HR=4.98, 95% CI=1.14-21.78). Following the introduction of PARPi, there was a trend toward improved PFS in patients with a higher Aletti_SCS who underwent R0 resection. These findings suggest that R0 resection may improve prognosis even in cases with a high tumor burden in the PARPi era.

The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in vulnerable patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: a single institution experience

Effective management with second-line therapy with the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen for patients with advanced endometrial cancer is necessary. This retrospective study enrolled patients with endometrial cancer treated with the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety for patients non-eligible for the KEYNOTE775 trial, aged ≥65 years, or with ECOG performance status 1-2. Forty-five patients were analyzed: 21 (47%) were aged ˃ 65 years, 16 (36%) had performance status 1-2, and 15 (33%) were non-eligible for KEYNOTE775 trial participation. Overall, the median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-12.4), and the median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI 9.4-NA). Median PFS was significantly shorter in patients not eligible for KEYNOTE775 participation and with performance status 1-2. The median OS was significantly shorter in patients with performance status 1-2. Grade ˃3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 78% of patients who received the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen. AEs resulted in lenvatinib dose reductions in 35 patients (78%) and lenvatinib and pembrolizumab discontinuation in 3 (7%) and 5 (11%), respectively. The median time to the first lenvatinib dose reduction was 1.5 (0.92-2.3) months in all patients and was significantly shorter in patients aged >65 years. The current regimen has favorable efficacy and manageable safety with appropriate dose reduction of lenvatinib in the real world. However, the efficacy may be inferior in patients with performance status 1 or 2, heavily treated patients, and those with organ dysfunction. The current treatment status should reflect real-world data relative to the medical environment and management.

High cost of chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies

Abstract Background The prognosis of gynecological malignancies has improved with the recent advent of molecularly targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, these drugs are expensive and contribute to the increasing costs of medical care. Methods The Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Health Economics Committee conducted a questionnaire survey of JCOG-affiliated facilities from July 2021 to June 2022 to assess the prevalence of high-cost regimens. Results A total of 57 affiliated facilities were surveyed regarding standard regimens for advanced ovarian and cervical cancers for gynecological malignancies. Responses were obtained from 39 facilities (68.4%) regarding ovarian cancer and 37 (64.9%) concerning cervical cancer, with respective case counts of 854 and 163. For ovarian cancer, 505 of 854 patients (59.1%) were treated with regimens that included PARP inhibitors, costing >500 000 Japanese yen monthly, while 111 patients (13.0%) received treatments that included bevacizumab, with costs exceeding 200 000 Japanese yen monthly. These costs are ~20 and ~10 times higher than those of the conventional regimens, respectively. For cervical cancer, 79 patients (48.4%) were treated with bevacizumab regimens costing >200 000 Japanese yen per month, ~10 times the cost of conventional treatments. Conclusions In this survey, >70% of patients with ovarian cancer were treated with regimens that included poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab; ~50% of patients with cervical cancer were treated with regimens containing bevacizumab. These treatments were ~10 and ~20 times more expensive than conventional regimens, respectively. These findings can inform future health economics studies, particularly in assessing cost-effectiveness and related matters.

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis. Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis. Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively. Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.