Investigator

Matthew T. Siedhoff

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Director · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology

MTSMatthew T. Siedho…
Papers(1)
The Impact of Minimal…
Collaborators(3)
Rebecca J. SchneyerKacey M. HamiltonKelly N. Wright
Institutions(1)
Unknown Institution

Papers

The Impact of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Subspecialty Training on Outcomes of Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

To compare surgical outcomes among patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy (MIM) or abdominal myomectomy (AM) with MIGS subspecialists versus general obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), and to characterize the complexity of myomectomies by surgeon type. Retrospective cohort study. Quaternary care institution. Patients who underwent MIM (laparoscopic or robotic) or AM with a fellowship-trained MIGS subspecialist or general OB/GYN from March 15, 2015 to March 14, 2020. Myomectomy. Of 609 myomectomies, 460 (75.5%) were MIM, 404 (87.8%) of which were performed by MIGS subspecialists. The remaining 149 (24.5%) cases were AM, 36 (24.1%) of which were performed by MIGS subspecialists. Compared to general OB/GYNs, MIGS subspecialists excised a greater number of fibroids for both MIM (median 3.0 [range 1.0-30.0] vs 2.0 [1.0-9.0], p 20 weeks size for AM (22.2% vs 3.5%, p = .003). Composite perioperative complication rates were significantly higher for general OB/GYNs than for MIGS subspecialists (29.0% vs 11.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.92). In a subgroup analysis of MIM only, general OB/GYNs had higher rates of composite perioperative complications (28.6% vs 9.9%, aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.27-8.97), excessive blood loss and/or transfusion (10.7% vs 3.0%, unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.92, 95% CI 1.41-10.91), surgery time ≥ 90th percentile (25.0% vs 8.9%, aOR 5.05, 95% CI 2.39-10.64), and conversions to laparotomy (10.7% vs 0.2%, unadjusted OR 48.36, 95% CI 5.71-409.93). For AM only, there were no significant differences in perioperative complication rates between groups. Fellowship-trained MIGS subspecialists had improved surgical outcomes for MIM compared to general OB/GYNs, with fewer conversions to laparotomy, reduced surgery time, and less blood loss, while outcomes for AM were similar by surgeon type. MIGS subspecialists excised a greater number of fibroids regardless of surgical approach, highlighting a level of comfort in complex benign gynecology beyond endoscopic surgery at our institution.

238Works
1Papers
3Collaborators

Positions

2016–

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Director

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Obstetrics and Gynecology

2011–

Assistant Professor

University of North Carolina · Obstetrics & Gynecology

Education

2011

Fellowship

University of North Carolina · Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

2011

Masters of Science in Clinical Research (MSCR)

University of North Carolina · Epidemiology

2009

Resident

New York University · Obstetrics & Gynecology

2005

Doctor of Medicine

Stanford University School of Medicine