Masatoshi Yokoyama

Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan: Challenges and Future Directions for Negative Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy/High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Positive Case Management

Cervical cancer screening is crucial for early detection and prevention. In Japan, women with negative intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) positivity are recommended retest for 12 months, rather than immediate colposcopy. International guidelines differ, and often prioritize early colposcopy for persistent HPV16/18 infections. This study evaluates Japan’s current screening approach, and identifies areas for improvement. A retrospective cohort study analyzed cervical cancer screening data from Saga Prefecture (2019–2021), assessing follow-up adherence, colposcopy referral rates, and CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection among NILM/HR-HPV+ cases. Among 27,789 individuals screened, 2248 (8.1%) were NILM/HR-HPV+. Follow-up adherence after 12 months was 54.4%. Of these, 132 with cytological abnormalities underwent colposcopy, revealing CIN2+ in 27.3% of cases. Additionally, 561 women with persistent NILM/HR-HPV+ underwent colposcopy, with CIN2+ in 7.6% and CIN3+ in 3.9% of cases. Japan’s current NILM/HR-HPV+ management strategy could delay the detection of high-grade cervical lesions. International guidelines favor earlier colposcopy referrals, particularly for HPV16/18+ cases. To improve cervical cancer prevention, Japan should consider a risk-based stratification model, enhance follow-up adherence, expand colposcopy access, and develop a national patient tracking system. Adopting primary HPV-based screening could attain the best global practices, facilitating earlier detection and reducing cervical cancer.

Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted a retrospective multi-institutional survey of patients who underwent cervical conization in Japan. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for positive surgical margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) patients after therapeutic cervical conization and those for positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence and did not undergo additional treatment. In 2009 and 2013, 14,832 patients underwent cervical conization at 205 institutions in Japan. Of these, 8856 patients who underwent therapeutic conization fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their histologic findings and clinical outcomes were evaluated based on standard statistical procedures and clinical and demographic characteristics. Negative and positive margins were observed in 7,585 and 1,271 (14.4%) patients, respectively. The predictors of positive margins were menopausal status (p<0.001), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (p<0.001), and Shimodaira-Taniguchi (S-T) conization (p<0.001). Of 1,271 patients with positive margins, 1,060 underwent no additional treatment; among those 1,060 patients, 129 (12.2%) experienced recurrence. The predictors of positive margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence were age, parity, gravidity, S-T conization, and laser scalpel conization. Menopausal status and treatment procedures were associated with positive margins after therapeutic conization of CIN 3. It is important to understand the characteristics of treatment procedures and select an appropriate procedure for each case. For elderly or menopausal patients with positive margins, immediate additional treatment is recommended.