Investigator

Masafumi Yasunaga

Kyushu Univeristy Hospital, Gynecology & Obstetrics

MYMasafumi Yasunaga
Papers(3)
Decision-making for S…A Case of Malignant P…Safety evaluation of …
Collaborators(6)
Tatsuhiro OhgamiEisuke KanekiHideaki YahataKaoru OkugawaKenzo SonodaKiyoko Kato
Institutions(4)
Kyushu University Hos…Kyushu UniversitySaga UniversityKyushu University Bep…

Papers

Decision-making for Subsequent Therapy for Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Endometrial Cancer Based on the Platinum-free Interval

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (REC) or advanced endometrial cancer (AEC) retreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) based on the platinum-free interval (PFI). We compared our results with those reported in the KEYNOTE-775 study (that used pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 65 patients with REC or AEC retreated with PCC between 2005 and 2020 at our hospital. Various clinicopathologic variables were analyzed: (1) age, (2) performance status, (3) histology, (4) history of pelvic irradiation in the adjuvant setting, (5) PFI, (6) chemotherapy regimen, (7) PFS and overall survival after retreatment with PCC, and (8) best ORR. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results: The best ORR and PFS were 43.3% and 9.5 months, respectively, in patients with REC/AEC with a PFI ≥6 months. These results were comparable with those of patients treated with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. The best ORR and PFS of patients with a PFI of <6 months appeared to be inferior to those of patients treated with pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib seems to be a better treatment choice for patients with REC or AEC with a PFI of <6 months. For a PFI of ≥6 months, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or PCC can be used depending on the degree of residual side -effects associated with cytotoxic agents.

Safety evaluation of abdominal trachelectomy in patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm: a single-institution, retrospective analysis

For oncologic safety, vaginal radical trachelectomy is generally performed only in patients with cervical cancers smaller than 2 cm. However, because inclusion criteria for abdominal trachelectomy are controversial, we evaluated the safety of abdominal trachelectomy for cervical cancers ≥2 cm. We began performing abdominal trachelectomies at our institution in 2005, primarily for squamous cell carcinoma ≤3 cm or adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma ≤2 cm. If a positive sentinel lymph node or cervical margin was diagnosed intraoperatively by frozen section, the trachelectomy was converted to a hysterectomy. Medical records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who had undergone simple abdominal trachelectomy were excluded from this study. We attempted trachelectomy in 212 patients. Among the 135 patients with tumors <2 cm, trachelectomy was successful in 120, one of whom developed recurrence and none of whom died of their disease. Among 77 patients with tumors ≥2 cm, trachelectomy was successful in 62, 2 of whom developed recurrence and 1 of whom died of her disease. The overall relapse rate after trachelectomy was 1.6% (0.8% in <2 cm group and 3.2% in ≥2 cm group), and the mortality rate was 0.5% (0% in <2 cm group and 1.6% in ≥2 cm group). Recurrence-free survival (p=0.303) and overall survival (p=0.193) did not differ significantly between the <2 cm and ≥2 cm groups. Abdominal trachelectomy with intraoperative frozen sections of sentinel lymph nodes and cervical margins is oncologically safe, even in patients with tumors ≥2 cm.

40Works
3Papers
6Collaborators
Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingEndometrial NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsPhyllodes Tumor

Positions

2015–

Researcher

Kyushu Univeristy Hospital · Gynecology & Obstetrics

Education

Kyushu University