Mariano Catello Di Donna

Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Percutaneous Ablation: New Opportunities for Treating Ovarian Cancer Liver Metastasis

Parenchymal liver metastases from ovarian cancer, occurring in 2-12.5% of cases, significantly worsen prognosis. While surgery and systemic treatments remain primary options, unresectable or chemotherapy-resistant multiple liver metastases pose a significant challenge. Recent advances in liver-directed therapies, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radioembolization, offer potential treatment alternatives. However, the efficacy of these techniques is limited by factors such as tumor size, number, and location. The ideal candidate for tumor ablation is a patient with paucifocal disease, a single tumor up to 5 cm or up to 3 tumors smaller than 3 cm and tumors 1 cm away from major bile ducts and high-flow vessels. Transarterial chemoembolization could be performed in patients with less than 70% tumor load. Differently, radioembolization is available with less limitation on the sites or number of liver cancers. Radioembolization techniques are also able to downsize liver metastases. However, there are limited data regarding the outcomes of loco-regional therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from ovarian cancer. Advancing liver-directed therapies through interventional oncology, combined with robust data on the oncological efficacy of these local treatments, will validate their potential as effective locoregional therapies for liver metastases. This could offer a promising treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer and unresectable hepatic metastases.

Robotic single-port (da Vinci SP) versus multiport (da Vinci Xi) for the treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional comparison of surgical outcomes

The da Vinci SP robotic platform offers a novel single-port approach for minimally invasive surgery. Despite its potential, data on its safety and performance in gynecologic oncology remain limited. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes of da Vinci SP versus da Vinci Xi systems in the staging of endometrial cancer (EC). This is a multi-institutional study. Data of consecutive patients with apparent early-stage EC or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who underwent robotic surgery between January 2023-March 2025 were collected. The primary outcome was to compare the surgical outcomes between da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi. A total of 189 patients were included: 97 (51.3 %) underwent SP surgery and 92 (48.7 %) Xi. The median (range) of operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were comparable for SP and Xi groups (140 [70-296] vs. 143 [60-297] min, p = 0.66, 40 [0-250] vs. 64 [0-1300] mL, p = 0.12, 3 [1-11] vs. 3[1-10] days, p = 1). Docking time was significantly shorter in the SP group (10 [4-31] vs. 12 [7-30] min for SP and Xi, respectively, p = 0.004). Intraoperative or post-operative complications rates were comparable (p = 0.30 and p = 0.14,respectively). The patient-reported pain score was significantly lower at 12h and 24h in the Xi group (p = 0.001), while was comparable at 48h after surgery (p = 1). The da Vinci SP system appears to be non-inferior to the multiport da Vinci Xi for surgical staging of early-stage EC. Comparable perioperative outcomes support its clinical use, although patient selection criteria and long-term results require further investigation.

Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Relapse Rate in Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer and Synchronous Endometrial-Ovarian Endometrioid Cancer (SEO-EC): Results from a Large Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: We aimed to evaluate Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and relapse rate in women affected by endometrioid ovarian cancer and synchronous endometrial-ovarian endometrioid cancer (SEO-EC). As secondary outcome, we assessed whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy could be considered a determinant of relapse rate in this population. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with diagnosis of endometrioid ovarian cancer or SEO-EC between January 2010 to September 2020, and calculated PFS, OS and relapse rate. Results: In almost all the patients (97.6%) who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, there were no lymph node metastases confirmed by histology. We did not find a significant difference (p = 0.6570) for the rate of relapse in the group of women who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (4/42; 9.5%) compared with the group of women who did not undergo the same procedure (1/21; 4.8%). During a median follow-up was 23 months, both PFS and OS were excellent. Conclusions: Women affected by early-stage low-grade endometrioid cancer and SEO-EC without apparent lymph node involvement at pre-operative imaging showed a very low rate of lymph node metastasis and similar relapse rate with or without lymphadenectomy.

‘Salvage cytoreductive surgery for pelvic side wall recurrent endometrial cancer: robotic combined laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) and laterally extended pelvic resection (LEPR) debulking’

Role of V-Y flap reconstruction in vulvar cancer patients: multicenter retrospective study

To assess if the use of a V-Y reconstructive flap after excisional radical surgery positively influences the surgical outcomes in patients with vulvar cancer. This was a multicenter, retrospective, controlled study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates of women with invasive vulvar cancer who underwent radical surgery and vulvar reconstruction and those who underwent radical surgery without the reconstruction step were compared. Only patients who underwent bilateral or unilateral V-Y advancement fascio-cutaneous flaps were included in the reconstruction group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze predicting variables for their association with complication rates. Overall, 361 patients were included: 190 (52%) underwent the reconstructive step after the excisional radical procedure and were compared with 171 (47.4%) who did not undergo the reconstructive step. At multivariate analysis, body mass index >30 kg/m The adoption of V-Y flaps in vulvar surgery was correlated with reduced surgical related complications, particularly in vulnerable patients involving large surgical defects following excisional radical procedures.

Detection of sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer using 99mTc-labeled colloid lymphoscintigraphy, blue dye, and indocyanine-green fluorescence: a meta-analysis of studies published in 2010–2020

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is widely accepted in the surgical staging of early vulvar cancer, although the most accurate method for its identification is not yet defined. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the technique with the highest pooled detection rate (DR) for the identification of SLN and compare the average number of SLNs detected by planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL), single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), blue dye and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search string was: "sentinel" and "vulv*", with date restriction from 1st January 2010 until Dec 31st, 2020. Three investigators selected studies based on: (1) a study cohort or a subset of a minimum of 10 patients with vulvar cancer undergoing either PL, SPECT/CT, blue-dye, or ICG fluorescence for the identification of SLN; (2) the possibility to extrapolate the DR or the average number of SLNs detected by a single technique (3) no evidence of other malignancies in the patient history. A total of 30 studies were selected. In a per-patient and a per-groin analysis, the DR for SLN of PL was respectively 96.13% and 92.57%; for the blue dye was 90.44% and 66.21%; for the ICG, the DR was 91.90% and 94.80%. The pooled DR of SPECT/CT was not calculated, since only two studies were performed in this setting. At a patient-based analysis, no significant difference was documented among PL, blue dye, and ICG (p = 0.28). At a per-groin analysis, PL and ICG demonstrated a significantly higher DR compared to blue dye (p < 0.05). The average number of SLNs, on a per-patient analysis, was available only for PL and ICG with a median number of 2.61 and 1.78 lymph nodes detected, respectively, and no significant statistical difference. This meta-analysis favors the use of ICG and PL alone and in combination over blue dye for the identification of the SLN in vulvar cancer. Future studies may investigate whether the combined approach allows the highest DR of SLN in patients with vulvar cancer.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer: Should We Look beyond Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device alone for managing early-stage endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia with atypia in patients unfit for surgery: the ENDOIUD study

This study aimed to clarify the role of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device as a stand-alone therapy in managing patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer who are not suitable for surgery, through the evaluation of cause-specific survival and the control of vaginal bleeding. This is a retrospective, multi-center study conducted in 9 referral gynecologic centers in Italy. Data regarding the clinical and oncological outcomes of patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I) were analyzed. Patients were judged unsuitable for surgery due to an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 and the presence of multiple severe co-morbidities and, therefore, triaged to receive levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device alone. A total of 78 women were enrolled. Fifteen patients (19.2%) had a diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia, whereas the other 63 (80.8%) had endometrial cancer. The baseline hemoglobin levels averaged 11.6 (range; 6-16), increasing to 12.1 (range; 7.8-14.9) during follow-up after levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device insertion (p = .003). No patient experienced any side effects, and bleeding control was rated as excellent in most patients. Median disease-free survival was 43 months (range; 5-120) and median overall survival was 45 months (range; 5-120). Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device alone is a safe and effective approach, showing no side effects, and a promising oncological outcome in women with early-stage endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer unfit for surgery. Future prospective studies are required to clarify how to select patient candidates for this therapy and how to predict response to levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device.

Surgical outcomes and morbidity in open and videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer: A systematic review and metanalysis”

Surgical evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes is essential to correctly guide the adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer patients. Open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) approach is the preferred route, while the videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) seems to be associated with better results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of OIL vs VEIL in vulvar cancer. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search string included the following keywords: "(vulvar cancer) AND ((inguinal) OR (femoral)) AND ((lymph node dissection) OR (lymphadenectomy))". Three double-blind researchers independently extracted data. Seventeen studies were considered eligible for the analysis. Seven studies were included in the OIL group and ten studies in the VEIL group. A total of 372 groins were included in OIL group and 197 groins in VEIL group. 153 groins (41.1 %) in the OIL group and 25 groins (12.6 %) in the VEIL group developed major complications. The analysis of all lymphatic and wound complications showed that VEIL had a lower rate of lymphatic and wound complications. Estimated blood loss (p = 0.4), hospital stay (p = 0.18), time of drainage (p = 0.74), number of lymph node excised (p = 0.74) did not show significant difference between the two approaches. VEIL route may be a valid alternative to OIL route with no differences in terms of surgical outcomes, except for operative time that is shorter for OIL. Future analysis of randomized controlled trials in this specific patient population are warranted to confirm these results.