Investigator

Marcin Grzegorzek

Professor of Medical Informatics · Universität zu Lübeck

MGMarcin Grzegorzek
Papers(2)
Artificial Intelligen…ECPC-IDS: A benchmark…
Collaborators(10)
Chen LiQian ChenQi BaoQi-Jun WuSong GaoTing-Ting GongWei YaoXiao-Han LiXin-Jian SongYu-Hong Zhao
Institutions(3)
University Of LbeckFirst Affiliated Hosp…China Medical Univers…

Papers

Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform cancer diagnosis, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. Objective We performed an umbrella review to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence for the AI-based imaging diagnosis of cancers. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and IEEE databases were searched for relevant systematic reviews from inception to June 19, 2024. Two independent investigators abstracted data and assessed the quality of evidence, using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. We further assessed the quality of evidence in each meta-analysis by applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Diagnostic performance data were synthesized narratively. Results In a comprehensive analysis of 158 included studies evaluating the performance of AI algorithms in noninvasive imaging diagnosis across 8 major human system cancers, the accuracy of the classifiers for central nervous system cancers varied widely (ranging from 48% to 100%). Similarities were observed in the diagnostic performance for cancers of the head and neck, respiratory system, digestive system, urinary system, female-related systems, skin, and other sites. Most meta-analyses demonstrated positive summary performance. For instance, 9 reviews meta-analyzed sensitivity and specificity for esophageal cancer, showing ranges of 90%-95% and 80%-93.8%, respectively. In the case of breast cancer detection, 8 reviews calculated the pooled sensitivity and specificity within the ranges of 75.4%-92% and 83%-90.6%, respectively. Four meta-analyses reported the ranges of sensitivity and specificity in ovarian cancer, and both were 75%-94%. Notably, in lung cancer, the pooled specificity was relatively low, primarily distributed between 65% and 80%. Furthermore, 80.4% (127/158) of the included studies were of high quality according to the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist, with the remaining studies classified as medium quality. The GRADE assessment indicated that the overall quality of the evidence was moderate to low. Conclusions Although AI shows great potential for achieving accelerated, accurate, and more objective diagnoses of multiple cancers, there are still hurdles to overcome before its implementation in clinical settings. The present findings highlight that a concerted effort from the research community, clinicians, and policymakers is required to overcome existing hurdles and translate this potential into improved patient outcomes and health care delivery. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42022364278; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022364278

ECPC-IDS: A benchmark endometrial cancer PET/CT image dataset for evaluation of semantic segmentation and detection of hypermetabolic regions

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common tumors in the female reproductive system and is the third most common gynecological malignancy that causes death after ovarian and cervical cancer. Early diagnosis can significantly improve the 5-year survival rate of patients. With the development of artificial intelligence, computer-assisted diagnosis plays an increasingly important role in improving the accuracy and objectivity of diagnosis and reducing the workload of doctors. However, the absence of publicly available image datasets restricts the application of computer-assisted diagnostic techniques. In this paper, a publicly available Endometrial Cancer PET/CT Image Dataset for Evaluation of Semantic Segmentation and Detection of Hypermetabolic Regions (ECPC-IDS) are published. Specifically, the segmentation section includes PET and CT images, with 7159 images in multiple formats totally. In order to prove the effectiveness of segmentation on ECPC-IDS, six deep learning semantic segmentation methods are selected to test the image segmentation task. The object detection section also includes PET and CT images, with 3579 images and XML files with annotation information totally. Eight deep learning methods are selected for experiments on the detection task. This study is conduct using deep learning-based semantic segmentation and object detection methods to demonstrate the distinguishability on ECPC-IDS. From a separate perspective, the minimum and maximum values of Dice on PET images are 0.546 and 0.743, respectively. The minimum and maximum values of Dice on CT images are 0.012 and 0.510, respectively. The target detection section's maximum mAP values on PET and CT images are 0.993 and 0.986, respectively. As far as we know, this is the first publicly available dataset of endometrial cancer with a large number of multi-modality images. ECPC-IDS can assist researchers in exploring new algorithms to enhance computer-assisted diagnosis, benefiting both clinical doctors and patients. ECPC-IDS is also freely published for non-commercial at: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/ECPC-IDS/23808258.

222Works
2Papers
15Collaborators
Neoplasms

Positions

2018–

Professor of Medical Informatics

Universität zu Lübeck

2016–

Senior Lecturer in Pattern Recognition

Universität Siegen

2010–

Assistant Professor of Pattern Recognition

Universität Siegen

2008–

Research Assistant (Multimedia Analysis)

Universität Koblenz-Landau

2006–

Research Assistant (Multimedia Analysis)

Queen Mary University of London

2002–

Doctoral Student (Pattern Recognition)

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg