Marcel Romey

Systematic Analysis of Homologous Recombination Deficiency Testing in Ovarian Cancer—Development of Recommendations for Optimal Assay Performance

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays are an important element of personalized oncology in ovarian carcinomas, but the optimal tissue requirements for these complex molecular assays remain unclear. As a result, a considerable percentage of assays are not successful, leading to suboptimal diagnoses for these patients. In this study, we have systematically analyzed tumor and tissue parameters for HRD analysis in a large cohort of real-world cancer samples. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for pathologists and gynecologic oncologists for selection of tissue samples to maximize the success rate of HRD analyses. Tumor samples from 2702 patients were sent to the Institute of Pathology of the Philipps-University Marburg between October 2020 and September 2022, of which 2654 were analyzed using the Myriad MyChoice HRD+ CDx assay. A total of 2396 of 2654 samples (90.3%) were successfully tested, of which 984 of 2396 (41.1%) were HRD positive and 1412 (58.9%) were HRD negative. Three hundred sixty-three of 2396 samples (15.2%) were BRCA1/2-mutated; 27 samples had a BRCA1/2 mutation and a genomic instability score (GIS) < 42. Twenty-two samples (0.9%) failed GIS measurement but displayed a BRCA1/2 mutation. BRCA1/2-mutated samples showed significantly (P < .0001) higher GIS values than those with a wild-type BRCA1/2 status. Tumor cell content, tumor area, and histology significantly (P < .0001) affected the probability of successfully analyzing a sample. Based on a systematic analysis of tumor cell content and tumor area, we recommend selecting patient high-grade serous ovarian cancer samples that display a tumor cell content ≥30% and a tumor area ≥0.5 cm

Homologous Recombination Deficiency as an Ovarian Cancer Biomarker in a Real-World Cohort

The diagnostic evaluation of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is central to define targeted therapy strategies for patients with ovarian carcinoma. We evaluated HRD in 514 ovarian carcinoma samples by next-generation sequencing of DNA libraries, including BRCA1/BRCA2 and 26,523 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using the standardized Myriad HRD assay, with the predefined cut point of ≥42 for a positive genomic instability score (GIS). All samples were measured in the central Myriad laboratory and in an academic molecular pathology laboratory. A positive GIS was detected in 196 (38.1%) of tumors, whereas 318 (61.9%) were GIS negative. Combining GIS and BRCA mutations, a total of 200 (38.9%) of the 514 tumors were HRD positive. A positive GIS was significantly associated with high-grade serous histology (P < 0.000001), grade 3 tumors (P = 0.001), and patient age <60 years (P = 0.0003). The concordance between both laboratories for the GIS status was 96.9% (P < 0.000001), with a sensitivity of 94.6% and a specificity of 98.4%. Concordance for HRD status was 97.1% (499 of 514 tumors). The percentage of HRD-positive tumors in our real-life cohort was similar to the proportion observed in the recently published PAOLA-1 trial, with high concordance between central and local laboratories. Our results support introduction of the standardized HRD assay in academic molecular pathology laboratories, thus broadening access to personalized oncology strategies for patients with ovarian cancer worldwide.