Investigator

Manish Rohilla

Faculty · Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology

Research Interests

MRManish Rohilla
Papers(3)
Small Cell Carcinoma …Ultrasound‐guided fin…Metastatic germ cell …
Collaborators(6)
Parikshaa GuptaPranab DeyNalini GuptaRadhika SrinivasanReetu KunduTarunpreet Saini
Institutions(2)
Maharashtra Institute…Post Graduate Institu…

Papers

Small Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary: Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 7 New Cases of a Rare Malignancy

Background Small cell carcinoma of ovary (SCCO) is extremely rare. Two types of SCCO are recognized, the pulmonary type (SCCOPT) and the hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT). Establishing an accurate diagnosis is challenging, owing to its rarity and paucity of data describing the distinctive histopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted over a period of 4 years. All cases reported as SCCO on histopathology were retrieved. All the available clinical, histopathological, and IHC features were studied in detail. Results A total of 7 cases of SCCO were diagnosed during the study period. There were 4 cases of SCCOPT and 3 cases of SCCOHT and with mean age of 57.25 and 22 years, respectively. All the cases presented as stage IV disease. Among the SCCOPT cases, 3 showed bilateral involvement with 1 showing concurrent uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Microscopy revealed small hyperchromatic cells with brisk mitosis and multifocal necrosis. On IHC, these were consistently positive for chromogranin, CD56, and synaptophysin. All the SCCOHT cases showed unilateral involvement. Microscopically, in addition to small hyperchromatic cells, larger “rhabdoid” tumor cells were also seen. On IHC, chromogranin was negative, with positivity for vimentin and epithelial membrane antigen. The expression of SMARCA4/BRG1 was lost while SMARCB1/INI1 was retained in all cases. All of these patients developed recurrence and died due to disease progression despite treatment. Conclusions SCCO is an extremely infrequent ovarian malignancy with poor prognosis. Knowledge about its characteristic features is important for accurate tissue diagnosis and appropriate management.

Ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of ovarian masses: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification using a categorical reporting system

AbstractIntroductionThe present study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell‐block immunocytochemistry, and to estimate the risk of malignancy, using a categorical reporting system, in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.MethodsThis was a 5‐year retrospective study of FNAs of ovarian masses. The cytological diagnoses were categorised as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, benign neoplasms, indeterminate for malignancy, suspicious for malignancy and malignant neoplasms. The cytology was correlated with the corresponding histopathology to assess the diagnostic accuracy and risk of malignancy associated with each diagnostic category.ResultsOf a total of 66 703 FNAs performed during the study period, 580 (0.9%) were performed on ovarian masses. Of these, 40 (6.9%) were reported as non‐neoplastic; 76 (13.1%) as benign neoplasms; 14 (2.4%) as indeterminate for malignancy, 48 (8.3%) as suspicious for malignancy, 337 (58.1%) as malignant neoplasms and 65 (11.2%) as inadequate for interpretation. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) was performed on 99 (17%) aspirates. Subsequent histopathology was available in 208 (35.8%) cases. On cyto‐histopathological correlation, 183 (88%) were concordant and 25 (12%) were discordant. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing ovarian malignancy were 88.4%, 85.7%, 96.8%, 60.0% and 88% respectively. Risk of malignancy for each category was 80%, 0%, 4.5%, 66.7%, 88.5% and 98.5% respectively.ConclusionsUltrasound‐guided FNAC has high specificity and diagnostic accuracy for preoperative diagnosis of ovarian malignancies and hence is a valid diagnostic procedure in certain clinical situations. Reporting using a categorical system imparts uniformity and also provides the clinicians with an associated risk of malignancy to guide further management.

3Papers
6Collaborators
CytodiagnosisBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisSalivary Gland NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsLung Neoplasms

Positions

2017–

Faculty

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology