Investigator

Maliketso Polane

University Of Kwazulu Natal

MPMaliketso Polane
Papers(2)
Exploring primary hea…A qualitative study e…
Collaborators(1)
Siyabonga Dlamini
Institutions(1)
University Of Kwazulu…

Papers

Exploring primary health care nurses’ perceptions of cervical cancer screening in Leribe, Lesotho

Background: Cervical cancer ranks fourth among cancers recorded globally and is the second most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in women. Although cervical cancer is fatal, the early discovery of precancerous cells by extensive and recurrent screening could lead to a significant decline in incidence. However, the acceptance of cervical cancer screening is low, even among healthcare workers. Aim: To explore the perceptions of primary care nurses about cervical cancer screening. Setting: The study was carried out in four primary health care centres (PHCCs) in the Leribe district. Methods: This is an exploratory qualitative study. The researcher purposively selected and interviewed 10 nurses at the selected PHCCs. The data were analysed thematically. Results: Nurses’ perceptions of cervical cancer screening influenced whether they routinely detect the disease. Certain perceptions, such as being susceptible to cancer, fear of cancer consequences, feeling relieved by negative results, high self-efficacy, training and witnessing deaths, all encouraged routine screening. Those that discouraged routine screening included fear of positive testing, lack of results, perceived lack of confidence and privacy in screeners and low self-efficacy. Conclusion: These findings show that nurses’ decisions to undergo a regular screening are either encouraged or discouraged by their perceptions about cervical cancer screening. They also imply that the general public may be impacted by these perceptions as well. Contribution: These findings add significantly to the body of knowledge about how policies can be improved to improve nursing screening programmes, which can improve screening rates among the general population.

A qualitative study exploring the primary health care nurses’ lived experiences of cervical cancer screening

Background: In the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), cervical cancer is the primary cause of cancer-related female deaths. Lesotho has a cervical cancer incidence that is 2.7 times higher than the global average. This disease can be prevented by vaccination, which is not available in all countries, and through screening, which has been shown to have low uptake even among health professionals. Aim: To explore primary health care (PHC) nurses’ lived experiences of cervical cancer screening in Lesotho. Thus, to better understand how these experiences can impact nurses’ subsequent screening or their goal of offering screening services to their patients. Setting: The study was conducted at four PHC centres in the selected district. Methods: This is a qualitative study in which a phenomenological design was used. Ten nurses were purposively selected and participated in the in-depth interviews. The data were analysed thematically. Results: The findings revealed participants’ positive and negative experiences with cervical cancer screening. Positive experiences, including good nursing services, freedom of choice and pain prevention, influenced the nurses’ intentions to continue to test in the future and to strongly recommend screening to other women. The negative experiences included a lack of privacy, the absence of counselling and receiving results late. These negative experiences had a detrimental effect on nurses’ intentions to undergo screening in the future. However, they had no impact on their goal of offering screening to other women. Conclusion: The findings provided essential insights into why cervical cancer screening uptake is low among nurses. Contribution: This evidence is critical for augmenting the knowledge of how cervical cancer screening programmes could be improved to enhance nurses’ screening uptake and invariably facilitate higher screening rates within the general population.

2Papers
1Collaborators