Investigator

Magdalena Plebanski

Professor · RMIT University, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences

MPMagdalena Plebans…
Papers(5)
HCMV as an Oncomodula…Hypoxia Regulates DPP…Pre-operative sera in…Dinuclear orthometall…Olaparib, durvalumab,…
Collaborators(10)
Srinivasa Reddy Teluk…Clare L. ScottAndrew N. StephensMichael FriedlanderNedaossadat MirzadehNirashaa T. BoundRanjith Kumar JakkuRodney LuworSally Baron-HaySandy Simon
Institutions(6)
Rmit UniversityWalter and Eliza Hall…Monash UniversityPrince of Wales Hospi…Walter and Eliza Hall…The Royal Melbourne H…

Papers

HCMV as an Oncomodulatory Virus in Ovarian Cancer: Implications of Viral Strain Heterogeneity, Immunomodulation, and Inflammation on the Tumour Microenvironment and Ovarian Cancer Progression

The complex relationship between human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and cancer has been of interest since the 1960s. As a highly prevalent human β-herpesvirus, HCMV establishes lifelong latency in CD34+ myeloid progenitor cells and has been implicated as an oncomodulatory virus in various cancers, including glioblastoma multiforme, breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancer (OC). Recently, discussions have emerged regarding the classification of HCMV as an eighth oncovirus due to the persistence of its nucleic acids and proteins in many tumour types. As one of the deadliest gynaecological cancers, OC is often characterised as the ‘silent killer’ with less than half of women surviving for 5 years, a rate that drops below 20% when detected at advanced stages. Reported effects of HCMV vary between cancers, likely due to differences in tumour type, viral strain, and disease stage. While HCMV infection has been linked to poor OC patient outcomes, its impact on the OC tumour microenvironment (TME) and immune system remains less understood. Investigating HCMV’s potential oncogenic role could provide critical insights into OC progression. This review discusses recent developments on HCMV’s multifaceted roles in OC, including strain heterogeneity, immunomodulation of the TME, dysregulation of inflammatory signalling pathways, and potential therapeutic approaches targeting HCMV in anti-cancer immunotherapies.

Pre-operative sera interleukin-6 in the diagnosis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer

AbstractPre-operative discrimination of malignant masses is crucial for accurate diagnosis and prompt referral to a gynae oncology centre for optimal surgical intervention. HGSOC progression is correlated with local and systemic inflammation. We hypothesised that inclusion of inflammatory biomarkers in sera may improve diagnostic tests. In the training cohort, we tested four existing clinical tests (RMI score and ROMA, CA125 and HE4) and a panel of 28 immune soluble biomarkers in sera from 66 patients undergoing surgery for suspected ovarian cancer. Six promising immune biomarkers alone, or in combination with conventional tests, were subsequently analysed in an independent validation cohort (n = 69). IL-6 was identified as the main driver of variability followed closely by conventional diagnostic tests. Median sera IL-6 was higher in HGSOC patients compared to those with a benign mass or controls with normal ovaries (28.3 vs 7.3 vs 1.2 pg/ml, p < 0.0001). The combination of IL-6 further improved the overall predictive probability of the conventional tests. Modelling a two-step triage of women with a suspicious ovarian mass, with IL-6 > 3.75 pg/ml as primary triage followed by conventional tests (CA125 or RMI score) identified ovarian cancer in patients with a misclassification rate of 4.54–3.03%, superior to the use of CA125 or RMI alone (9.09 to 10.60). The validation cohort demonstrated a similar improvement in the diagnostic sensitivity following addition of IL-6. IL-6 in combination with conventional tests may be a useful clinical biomarker for triage of patients with a suspected malignant ovarian mass.

Dinuclear orthometallated gold(I)-gold(III) anticancer complexes with potent in vivo activity through an ROS-dependent mechanism

Abstract Increasingly explored over the last decade, gold complexes have shown great promise in the field of cancer therapeutics. A major obstacle to their clinical progression has been their lack of in vivo stability, particularly for gold(III) complexes, which often undergo a facile reduction in the presence of biomolecules such as glutathione. Herein, we report a new class of promising anticancer gold(I)–gold(III) complexes with the general formula [XAuI(μ-2-C6F4PPh2)(κ2-2-C6F4PPh2)AuIIIX] [X = Cl (1), Br (2), NO3 (3)] which feature two gold atoms in different oxidation states (I and III) in a single molecule. Interestingly, gold(I)–gold(III) complexes (1–3) are stable against glutathione reduction under physiological-like conditions. In addition, complexes 1–3 exhibit significant cytotoxicity (276-fold greater than cisplatin) toward the tested cancer cells compared to the noncancerous cells. Moreover, the gold(I)–gold(III) complexes do not interact with DNA-like cisplatin but target cellular thioredoxin reductase, an enzyme linked to the development of cisplatin drug resistance. Complexes 1–3 also showed potential to inhibit cancer and endothelial cell migration, as well as tube formation during angiogenesis. In vivo studies in a murine HeLa xenograft model further showed the gold compounds may inhibit tumor growth on par clinically used cisplatin, supporting the significant potential this new compound class has for further development as cancer therapeutic.

Olaparib, durvalumab, and cyclophosphamide, and a prognostic blood signature in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: the randomized phase 2 SOLACE2 trial

Abstract SOLACE2 (ACTRN12618000686202) investigates whether 12-weeks of olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib priming, improves subsequent durvalumab-olaparib progression-free survival (PFS), and is superior to olaparib monotherapy without any priming, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 114). We also evaluate the utility of CUP-CC assay, an immune signature of C-C chemokine receptor type 4 up-regulation, chemokines, and cytokines. Priming with olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib, followed by durvalumab-olaparib, are both associated with longer PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy, but do not reach the pre-specified primary endpoint of 36-week trial threshold (PFS36). PFS36 rates are 47.4% (95% CI, 31.0-62.1; olaparib priming then olaparib-durvalumab), 48.7% (32.5-63.2; olaparib-cyclophosphamide then olaparib-durvalumab) and 35.1% (20.4-50.3; olaparib monotherapy). PFS is significantly longer for the homologous recombination deficient (N = 71) as compared to the proficient (HRP) (N = 29) subgroups (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.55, 0.35-0.87). CUP-CC+ subgroup (N = 58) has a significantly longer PFS (HR 0.31, 0.19-0.49) than CUP-CC- (N = 46). Future studies should investigate whether CUP-CC has the potential to personalize poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapies for patients who are BRCA wild-type, including HRP patients.

285Works
5Papers
32Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsNeoplasmsApoptosisPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentDisease ProgressionCytomegalovirus InfectionsArthritis, Rheumatoid

Positions

2017–

Professor

RMIT University · School of Health and Biomedical Sciences

2007–

Professor

Monash University · Immunology and Pathology

1999–

Laboratory Head and Associate Professor

Burnet Institute · Vaccines and Infectious Disaeses

1995–

Senior Postdoctoral Fellow

University of Oxford · Weatherall Institute of Moleculer Medicine

1993–

Postdoctoral Fellow

University of Oxford · Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine

Education

2017

Diploma in Psychological Studies

Deakin University · School of Psychology

2010

MBA

Deakin University · Business School

1993

PhD

University of Bristol · Immunology and Pathology

1988

BscHon

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas

Country

AU