M. Campitelli

Real-world outcomes of PARP inhibitor maintenance in advanced ovarian cancer: a focus on disease patterns and treatment modalities at recurrence

The utilization of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) as a first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer has increased significantly, with ∼80% of patients potentially eligible. This expansion has led to a rise in the population experiencing platinum-sensitive recurrence, yet data on first recurrence during PARPi are limited. This real-world study from a high-volume referral center aims to elucidate recurrence rates, disease distribution, and treatment modalities at the time of progression in PARPi-treated patients. We analyzed our prospectively maintained database to identify patients receiving first-line PARPi maintenance from January 2019 to December 2022 at our institution. A total of 373 cases were identified, 51.5% of which had a BRCA mutation. With a median follow-up of 38 months, 44.8% of patients experienced recurrence, with 90.3% having a platinum-free interval exceeding 6 months. Recurrences were oligometastatic in 44.9% of cases, with BRCA mutations strongly predicting this pattern (hazard ratio 3.014, confidence interval 1.486-6.113, P = 0.002). The median progression-free survival was 39 months, significantly longer for BRCA-mutated and homologous recombination deficiency-positive patients. Over one-third of platinum-sensitive recurrent patients were candidates for local treatments, and PARPi administration was prolonged in 53.7%. Despite the notable survival improvement, a significant proportion of the population will experience a platinum-sensitive recurrence on PARPi, for which local treatments are often a viable option. Our study highlights the need for further research to determine whether the ablation of oligometastatic sites has a significant impact on post-recurrence survival and to identify if there are patient categories that would benefit from personalized follow-up due to their susceptibility to oligometastatic recurrences and local treatments.

Cervical cancer patterns of care in Italy: A radiation oncology survey of MITO and AIRO GYN groups

Large heterogeneity in therapeutic approaches to cervical cancer (CC) patients has been registered worldwide; a national survey exploring practice settings and equipments in CC treatment was distributed to radiation oncologists. Questionnaires were compiled in 90 of 194 Centers (compliance: 46.3 %). Most of respondents reported the presence of multidisciplinary tumor board, and modern equipments/techniques; 55.5 % of centers reported >1 brachytherapy (BT) equipment, thus implying the need to refer their patients outside for the remaining centers. Post-surgery radiotherapy was performed in 96.7 % of early CC (ECC) cases with pathological high risk factors. Exclusive chemoradiation with concomitant platinum schedules was referred to be used by 84.4 % of centers in locally advanced CC. Alternative options were reported with a range between 4.4 and 28.9 %. The present survey reports a broad spectrum of therapeutic options for CC in Italy. Availability and use of modern techniques is quite diffuse, but the distribution of BT resources and skills remains a challenge.

Brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy as a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynaecology Study Group in the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) review

This review analyzes the experience and trends in external beam radiotherapy for delivering a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer, identifying whether radiation therapy modalities impact clinical outcomes with the ultimate aim of evaluating alternatives to brachytherapy. Three independent Italian radiation oncologists conducted a literature search on different external beam radiotherapy boost modalities in locally advanced cervical cancer. The search yielded 30 studies. Eight dosimetric studies, evaluating target coverage and dose to organs at risk, and nine clinical investigations, reporting clinical outcomes, were analyzed. Dosimetric studies comparing external beam radiotherapy boost with brachytherapy produced divergent results, while clinical studies were limited by their retrospective nature, heterogeneous doses, radiation schedules, volumes and techniques, diverse follow-up times, and small cohorts of patients. Evidence emerged that high-tech external beam radiotherapy seemed no better than image-guided brachytherapy for delivering a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer. Prospective clinical studies comparing high-tech external beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy should be encouraged.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic cervical cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD study): a collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO groups

This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy in a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer. A standardized data collection from several radiotherapy centers that treated patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy between March 2006 and February 2021 was set up. Clinical and stereotactic body radiotherapy parameters were collected. Objective response rate was defined as a composite of complete and partial response, while clinical benefit included objective response rate plus stable disease. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales were used to grade toxicities. The primary endpoints were the rate of complete response to stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the 2 year actuarial local control rate on a 'per lesion' basis. The secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as toxicity. A total of 83 patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer bearing 125 lesions treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy at 15 different centers were selected for analysis. Of the sites of metastatic disease, lymph node metastases were most common (55.2%), followed by parenchyma lesions (44.8%). Median total dose was 35 Gy (range 10-60), in five fractions (range 1-10), with a median dose/fraction of 7 Gy (range 4-26). Complete, partial, and stable response were found in 73 (58.4%), 29 (23.2%), and 16 (12.8%) lesions, respectively, reaching 94.4% of the clinical benefit rate. Forty-six (55.4%) patients had a complete response. Patients achieving complete response on a 'per lesion' basis experienced a 2 year actuarial local control rate of 89.0% versus 22.1% in lesions not achieving complete response (p<0.001). The 2 year actuarial progression-free survival rate was 42.5% in patients with complete response versus 7.8% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.001). The 2 year actuarial overall survival rate was 68.9% in patients with complete response versus 44.3% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.015). Fifteen patients (18.1%) had mild acute toxicity, totaling 29 side events. Late toxicity was documented in four patients (4.8%) totaling seven adverse events. Our analysis confirmed the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer patients. The low toxicity profile encourages the wider use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in this setting.