Investigator

Lukas Dostalek

Charles University

LDLukas Dostalek
Papers(3)
A Simple Cervicovagin…HPV testing as an eff…Regression of high-gr…
Collaborators(10)
Álvaro CarmonaMarta PinedaMartin WidschwendterMichael WongMichal ZikanPaula Peremiquel-Tril…Radim MarekSonia PaytubiBeatriz PelegrinaChiara Herzog
Institutions(8)
Charles UniversityUniversidad Loyola An…Instituto De Salud Ca…Leopold-Franzens-Univ…Royal London HospitalInstitut Dinvestigaci…Fakultní Nemocnice Ol…King's College London

Papers

A Simple Cervicovaginal Epigenetic Test for Screening and Rapid Triage of Women With Suspected Endometrial Cancer: Validation in Several Cohort and Case/Control Sets

PURPOSE Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence has been rising over the past 10 years. Delays in diagnosis reduce survival and necessitate more aggressive treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a simple, noninvasive, and reliable triage test for EC to reduce the number of invasive diagnostic procedures and improve patient survival. METHODS We developed a test to screen and triage women with suspected EC using 726 cervical smear samples from women with and without EC, and validated the test in 562 cervicovaginal samples using three different collection methods (cervical smear: n = 248; vaginal swab: n = 63; and self-collection: n = 251) and four different settings (case/control: n = 388; cohort of women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding: n = 63; a cohort of high-risk women with Lynch syndrome: n = 25; and a nested case/control setting from a screening cohort and samples taken up to 3 years before EC diagnosis: n = 86). RESULTS We describe the Women's cancer risk IDentification – quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for Endometrial Cancer (WID-qEC), a three-marker test that evaluates DNA methylation in gene regions of GYPC and ZSCAN12. In cervical, self-collected, and vaginal swab samples derived from symptomatic patients, it detected EC with sensitivities of 97.2% (95% CI, 90.2 to 99.7), 90.1% (83.6 to 94.6), and 100% (63.1 to 100), respectively, and specificities of 75.8% (63.6 to 85.5), 86.7% (79.3 to 92.2), and 89.1% (77.8 to 95.9), respectively. The WID-qEC identified 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8 to 98.9) of EC cases in samples predating diagnosis up to 1 year. Test performance was similar across menopausal status, age, stage, grade, ethnicity, and histology. CONCLUSION The WID-qEC is a noninvasive reliable test for triage of women with symptoms suggestive of ECs. Because of the potential for self-collection, it could improve early diagnosis and reduce the reliance for in-person visits.

HPV testing as an effective triage strategy in the follow-up after fertility-sparing treatment for glandular lesions of the uterine cervix

The management and surveillance of glandular pre-cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix present distinct challenges compared with squamous lesions, primarily attributed to the lower effectiveness of diagnostic methods such as cytology or colposcopy. This study aimed to investigate the long-term safety of fertility-sparing treatment for adenocarcinoma in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix, while identifying factors associated with recurrence, with a particular emphasis on the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ or microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma who received treatment at a single center between 2002 and 2023. The study involved the examination of consecutive surgical specimens and the follow-up details. Factors associated with recurrence were assessed in a subgroup of patients with available long-term follow-up data (at least 6 months). In total, 143 patients (112 with adenocarcinoma in situ and 31 with adenocarcinoma) were included in the analysis. Among the 86 patients who underwent fertility-sparing treatment, the recurrence rate was 9% (12% for adenocarcinoma in situ and 4% for adenocarcinoma) during a median follow-up period of 56.6 months (range 7-179). No patients who were HPV negative experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. In contrast, among patients who were HPV positive, the recurrence rate was 38%. Additionally, HPV 16/18 positivity displayed a notable association with a higher risk of recurrence compared with the other high-risk genotypes, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (83% vs 10%; p=0.083, log-rank). Our retrospective study demonstrated a significant association between the risk of recurrence and HPV status during the follow-up period. Consequently, long-term follow-up utilizing HPV testing and genotyping appears to be a secure alternative to a hysterectomy.

Regression of high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions and associated risk factors (RECER)

Avoiding conization may reduce the risk of pre-term labor in future pregnancies, making conservative treatment of high-grade cervical dysplasia an increasingly discussed approach, especially for younger patients. However, data on the integration of individual predictive factors into routine clinical practice remain limited. The primary objective of the Regression of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Cervical Lesions and Associated Risk Factors (RECER) study is to assess the rate of spontaneous regression in high-grade cervical squamous dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 2 and 3) and identify associated predictive factors within clinical practice, without necessitating conization. We hypothesize that the characterization of cervical lesions, including colposcopic findings and patient-specific factors, along with a sufficient rate of spontaneous regression, will aid in identifying a subgroup of patients who may derive the greatest benefit from conservative management of high-grade cervical lesions. The RECER trial is a multi-center prospective cohort study. Patients with histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN 2 or 3) undergo colposcopic assessments every 4 months. Colposcopic images are compared to evaluate lesion dynamics. In case of progression, conization is indicated, whereas in case of regression, documentation of a biopsy with low-grade dysplasia (CIN 1) or no dysplasia is required. Patients with stable disease are further followed up. Patients aged 18 to 40 years with bioptically confirmed high-grade lesion (CIN 2 or 3), a fully visible squamo-columnar junction, and a willingness to undergo conservative management can be included. Excluded are patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy, pregnancy, glandular lesions, invasive disease, or a history of treatment for severe cervical dysplasia. The primary end point is the regression rate of high-grade cervical dysplasia. 300 patients ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: As of October 2024, a total of 127 patients have been recruited from 4 participating sites across 3 countries. Estimated date of last patient enrollment: September 2026; estimated date for results presentation: January 2028. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06147388.

Clinical Trials (3)

NCT07400835University of Aarhus

Evaluation of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected Urine and Vaginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the clinical utility of DNA-methylation testing in urine and vaginal samples collected by patients and cervical samples collected by clinicians, to determine the risk of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women with postmenopausal bleeding. The study aims to answer the following research questions: * What is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in urine, vaginal and cervical samples compared to traditional TVUS for endometrial cancer detection? * What is the 2-year risk of EC among women testing negative on TVUS and/or DNA methylation tests or those testing positive on methylation only? Researchers will compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples as well as in clinician-collected cervical samples, with the traditional diagnostic pathway for women with PMB, which includes TVUS evaluation, and when indicated by abnormal TVUS findings, endometrial biopsy according to clinical guidelines. Participants will * take a urine and vaginal sample * have a cervical sample collected by a clinician * undergo TVUS evaluation according to clinical guidelines * If TVUS shows thickened endometrium (≥ 5 mm) and/or irregularity, an endometrial biopsy will be collected according to clinical guidelines * fill out a questionnaire regarding acceptability and preferences of sampling methods and complete a lifestyle questionnaire.

2Works
3Papers
23Collaborators
3Trials
Links & IDs
0000-0003-0151-4559

Scopus: 57200084495