Investigator

Lukas Chinczewski

Charit Universittsmedizin Berlin

LCLukas Chinczewski
Papers(2)
The Charité protocol …Intergroup-statement:…
Institutions(1)
Charit Universittsmed…

Papers

The Charité protocol for surveillance, treatment and after-care management in women with Lynch syndrome

Abstract Background Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited cancer syndrome, caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. While primarily associated with colorectal cancer, LS significantly impacts gynecological oncology, with increased risks for endometrial and ovarian cancers. Despite its clinical relevance, structured counseling and surveillance programs tailored to LS patients in gynecology are lacking. Objective and methods This study presents the first structured gynecological outpatient consultation program for LS patients in Germany, established at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin in August 2021. The aim was to develop an individualized, multidisciplinary framework for surveillance, therapy, and follow-up care, addressing the specific needs of different patient cohorts. Between August 2021 and December 2023, clinical data from 40 LS patients were collected and analyzed descriptively. From this experience, we furthermore concluded a guideline for the care of individuals with Lynch syndrome. Results Among the 40 patients, 21 had been diagnosed with cancer (affected group), while 19 were cancer-free and undergoing routine surveillance (non-affected group). The distribution of MMR gene mutations was 40% MSH2, 25% MSH6, 25% PMS2, and 15% MLH1. In the non-affected group, the median age was 38 years, with a BMI of 21.4. Surveillance identified one urothelial carcinoma and one case of endometrial hyperplasia. In the affected group, the mean age was 55.2 years, and the BMI was 24.7. Twenty-three gynecological cancers were diagnosed, of which 52% were endometrial, 26% ovarian, and 18% breast cancers. 61.1% of tumors were MSI-positive, and 33.3% of patients received immunotherapy. Conclusion A holistic, multidisciplinary approach is essential for the management of LS patients in gynecological oncology. The structured consultation model developed at Charité facilitates personalized surveillance, risk-adapted prevention, and evidence-based therapy strategies. Future studies and clinical trials should further investigate screening protocols, therapeutic interventions, and the role of LS patients in targeted treatment approaches. This guideline serves as a preliminary framework and will be continuously adapted as new research emerges.

Intergroup-statement: statement of the german ovarian cancer commission, the North-Eastern German Society of gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), AGO Austria and AGO Swiss regarding the use of homologous repair deficiency (HRD) assays in advanced ovarian cancer

Abstract Introduction Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a key biomarker in the management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), guiding treatment decisions, particularly regarding the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). As multiple HRD assays are available, each with distinct methodologies and cutoff values, the interpretation and clinical application of HRD testing remain complex. This intergroup statement, endorsed by the German Ovarian Cancer Commission, NOGGO, AGO Austria, and AGO Swiss, aims to provide guidance on the indications, appropriate use, and limitations of HRD testing in ovarian cancer. Materials and methods The statement is based on an interdisciplinary review of available literature, clinical trial data, and expert consensus. The recommendations focus on the current landscape of HRD assays, their clinical applicability, and practical considerations regarding the optimal timing and indications for testing. Results and discussion Various HRD assays, including established commercial tests and emerging academic-clinical approaches, are reviewed in this statement. The document outlines key eligibility criteria for HRD testing in ovarian cancer, emphasizing its relevance in specific histological subtypes and clinical scenarios. Additionally, exclusion criteria are defined, highlighting cases where HRD testing may not be appropriate due to insufficient clinical validation or lack of therapeutic implications. Finally, the statement discusses the pathological minimum requirements for tissue samples used in HRD testing, ensuring adequate sample quality and tumor content for reliable results. Conclusion HRD testing is a valuable tool for personalizing ovarian cancer treatment, particularly in identifying patients who may benefit from PARPi therapy. However, assay selection, timing, and result interpretation require careful consideration. This statement provides a structured approach to optimize HRD testing, aiming to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

2Papers
Ovarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Education

2020

Ruprecht Karls Universität Heidelberg