Luigi Antonio De Vitis

Sentinel node mapping in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: Analysis of 5-year oncologic outcomes

To assess 5-year oncologic outcomes of apparent early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic lymphadenectomy. This is a multi-institutional retrospective, propensity-matched study evaluating data of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer (according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines) undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (with and without para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Overall, the charts of 242 patients with high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer were retrieved. Data on 73 (30.1%) patients undergoing hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping were analyzed. Forty-two (57.5%) and 31 (42.5%) patients were classified in the high-intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Unilateral sentinel node mapping was achieved in all patients. Bilateral mapping was achieved in 67 (91.7%) patients. Three (4.1%) patients had site-specific lymphadenectomy (two pelvic areas only and one pelvic plus para-aortic area), while adjunctive nodal dissection was omitted in the hemipelvis of the other three (4.1%) patients. Sentinel nodes were detected in the para-aortic area in eight (10.9%) patients. Twenty-four (32.8%) patients were diagnosed with nodal disease. A propensity-score matching was used to compare the aforementioned group of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping with a group of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Seventy patient pairs were selected (70 having sentinel node mapping vs. 70 having lymphadenectomy). Patients undergoing sentinel node mapping experienced similar 5-year disease-free survival (HR: 1.233; 95%CI: 0.6217 to 2.444; p = 0.547, log-rank test) and 5-year overall survival (HR: 1.505; 95%CI: 0.6752 to 3.355; p = 0.256, log-rank test) than patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Sentinel node mapping does not negatively impact 5-year outcomes of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of Müllerian origin in a patient with germline SMARCA4 mutation

Highlights from the 24th European Congress on Gynaecological Oncology in Istanbul: an ENYGO-IJGC Fellows compilation

Primary versus interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with rare epithelial or non-epithelial ovarian cancer

The standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is primary cytoreductive surgery, with the goal of achieving no residual disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery can be viable treatment options for patients with extensive disease that precludes complete tumor removal during initial surgery, or when significant comorbidities increase the surgical risk without adversely impacting overall survival rates. However, published studies mostly included patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, with an underrepresentation of non-high-grade serous epithelial and non-epithelial cancers. This review aimed to provide an overview of the available data on the outcomes of primary cytoreductive surgery versus interval cytoreduction in patients with rare ovarian cancer histotypes. Published literature on primary versus interval cytoreductive surgery in non-high-grade serous ovarian cancers from 2004 to 2024 was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar and reported for each histological subtype. The outcomes of patients with low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear-cell, and mucinous carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed. Furthermore, the results following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-epithelial ovarian cancers, such as ovarian germ cell tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, and small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, have also been reported. Most data were derived from retrospective studies, with heterogeneity in design. Several ovarian cancer histotypes, including low-grade serous and mucinous carcinomas, may be less responsive than high-grade serous carcinomas to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Consequently, primary cytoreduction with maximal surgical effort may confer a survival advantage. Other tumors responded well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, allowing for interval fertility-sparing surgeries. Additional evidence is required because no prospective studies are currently available. Given the low incidence of these diseases, randomized controlled trials may not be feasible. However, national or international registries could play a pivotal role in determining the optimal approach for managing patients with these rare histotypes.

Clinicopathological characteristics of multiple-classifier endometrial cancers: a cohort study and systematic review

Endometrial cancers with more than one molecular feature- To describe our cohort of multiple classifiers and to report the results of a review on their incidence and the techniques used to identify them. Multiple classifiers identified at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, between April 2019 and Decmber 2022, were included. Clinicopathological, molecular characteristics, and oncologic outcomes were summarized and compared between single and multiple classifiers sharing common features. Studies on molecular classification of endometrial cancer were searched in the PubMed Database to collect data on the incidence of multiple classifiers and the techniques used for classification. Among 422 patients, 48 (11.4%) were multiple classifiers: 15 (3.6%) POLEmut-p53abn, 2 (0.5%) POLEmut-MMRd, 28 (6.6%) MMRd-p53abn, and 3 (0.7%) POLEmut-MMRd-p53abn. MMRd-p53abn and MMRd differed in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 2.0%, p=0.006), grade (high-grade: 55.6% vs 22.2%, p=0.001), and MMR proteins expression, whereas they differed from p53abn in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.006). POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut differed only in grade (high-grade: 66.7% vs 22.7%, p=0.008), while they differed from p53abn in age (56.1 vs 66.7 years, p=0.003), stage (advanced: 6.7% vs 53.4%, p=0.001), and histotype (non-endometrioid: 6.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.002). Two (7.1%) patients with MMRd-p53abn, 4 (4.0%) with MMRd, and 25 (34.3%) with p53abn had a recurrence. No recurrences were observed in POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut. The characteristics of POLEmut-p53abn resembled those of POLEmut, whereas MMRd-p53abn appeared to be intermediate between MMRd and p53abn. The high proportion of multiple classifiers may be related to the methods used for molecular classification, which included both p53 immunohistochemistry and

Let go of the myth: safety of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer

Sentinel lymph node mapping by intracervical indocyanine green injection is the preferred method for surgical staging in endometrial cancer. Adverse reactions to indocyanine green are extremely rare, and information about the safety of this tracer in patients with a history of other allergies, asthma, or comorbidities is limited. We aim to evaluate the rate of adverse reactions to indocyanine green injected during sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer and review the etiology of such reactions. All patients with endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green cervical stroma injection at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota between June 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Any adverse reaction occurring intra-operatively or within 7 days after surgery was identified. A thorough chart review was performed by an allergy specialist physician for any patient with an allergic-type reaction. We included 923 patients of which 565 (61.2%) had a history of allergy to antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), other medications, and/or environmental exposures. Of 490 patients who had previously received contrast media, 25 (5.1%) had a history of an adverse reaction. No immediate anaphylaxis or other allergic reactions were observed after indocyanine green injection. 10 (1.1%) patients developed a transient skin reaction within 7 days after surgery. None of these patients had a history of contrast media reaction. Based on timing and clinical/peri-operative history of affected patients, it was determined that skin reactions were likely induced by other newly prescribed medications or contact sensitivity, not administration of indocyanine green. Indocyanine green injection for sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer caused no immediate/delayed anaphylactic or other severe allergic reactions. This included patients with a history of other allergies, asthma, and comorbidities. The myth of iodine's relationship to allergic reactions must be refuted to allow indocyanine green use in patients with a history of contrast media or shellfish allergy.

Characteristics and outcomes of surgically staged multiple classifier endometrial cancer

The growing adoption of molecular and genomic characterization is changing the current landscape of treatment of endometrial cancer patients. Using the surrogate molecular classification, endometrial cancer patients can be classified in four subgroups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMRd/MSI-H, p53 abnormal (p53abn), and no specific mutational profile (NSMP). However, some patients can harbor two or more molecular features (defined as multiple classifier). Since the rarity of this occurrence, evidence regarding multiple classifiers is still limited. Here, we described characteristics and outcomes of multiple classifiers. This is a multi-institutional retrospective study. Data of consecutive patients having 2 or more molecular features were collected. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Charts of 72 multiple classifiers were reviewed. Median (range) follow-up was 9.8 (1.2, 37.5) months. Overall, 31 (43%) patients had POLEmut. Patients with POLEmut-MMRd/MSI-H, POLEmut-p53abn, and POLEmut-MMRd/MSI-H-p53abn were 6 (8.3%), 20 (27.8%), and 5 (6.9%), respectively. Among those 31 patients, no recurrence occurred within a median follow-up of 10.5 months (only seven (22.6%) patients had at least 2-year follow-up). The remaining 41 (56.9%) patients were diagnosed with tumors harboring both p53 and MMRd/MSI-H. Among them, four (9.8%) recurrences occurred at a median follow-up time of 8.9 months. Adjuvant therapy (other than vaginal brachytherapy) was administered in 5/31 (16%) and 25/41 (61%) patients with and without POLEmut, respectively (p < 0.001). Multiple classifiers endometrial cancer with POLEmut are characterized by good prognosis even in case of presence of MMRd/MSI-H and/or p53abn. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Rewinding the clock on positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: does it predict prognosis in low-risk disease?

Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer is a known risk factor for worse oncologic outcomes but is not used for staging purposes or to guide adjuvant treatment. Additionally, its prognostic impact on low-risk patients remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and focused on low-risk disease. This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for endometrial cancer at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2021. The role of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in the entire cohort and in 2 subgroups: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to NCCN guidelines (endometrioid, grade 1-2, stage IA) and the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines (as NCCN, plus no lymphovascular space invasion). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of positive peritoneal cytology with recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in all groups. A total of 3517 patients were included, 1911 in the NCCN low-risk group and 1832 in the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group. Positive peritoneal cytology was found in 15.9% of the entire cohort (559/3517), 8.1% of the NCCN low-risk group (154/1911), and 7.9% of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group (145/1832). In both low-risk groups, 5-year recurrence-free survival was worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively), but there was no difference in overall survival. On univariate analysis, age, tumor grade, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant predictors of recurrence in both subgroups. After multivariable analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained independently associated with recurrence (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). Positive peritoneal cytology was an independent predictor of recurrence and was associated with worse recurrence-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. However, overall survival was not impacted.

The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment

No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification. Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class. In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence. Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.

Artificial intelligence model for enhancing the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia

Transvaginal ultrasound is typically the initial diagnostic approach in patients with postmenopausal bleeding for detecting endometrial atypical hyperplasia/cancer. Although transvaginal ultrasound demonstrates notable sensitivity, its specificity remains limited. The objective of this study was to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound through the integration of artificial intelligence. By using transvaginal ultrasound images, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence based automated segmentation model and an artificial intelligence based classifier model. Patients with postmenopausal bleeding undergoing transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial sampling at Mayo Clinic between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively included. Manual segmentation of images was performed by four physicians (readers). Patients were classified into cohort A (atypical hyperplasia/cancer) and cohort B (benign) based on the pathologic report of endometrial sampling. A fully automated segmentation model was developed, and the performance of the model in correctly identifying the endometrium was compared with physician made segmentation using similarity metrics. To develop the classifier model, radiomic features were calculated from the manually segmented regions-of-interest. These features were used to train a wide range of machine learning based classifiers. The top performing machine learning classifier was evaluated using a threefold approach, and diagnostic accuracy was assessed through the F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). 302 patients were included. Automated segmentation-reader agreement was 0.79±0.21 using the Dice coefficient. For the classification task, 92 radiomic features related to pixel texture/shape/intensity were found to be significantly different between cohort A and B. The threefold evaluation of the top performing classifier model showed an AUC-ROC of 0.90 (range 0.88-0.92) on the validation set and 0.88 (range 0.86-0.91) on the hold-out test set. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (range 0.77-0.94) and 0.86 (range 0.81-0.94), respectively. We trained an artificial intelligence based algorithm to differentiate endometrial atypical hyperplasia/cancer from benign conditions on transvaginal ultrasound images in a population of patients with postmenopausal bleeding.

Advancing endometrial cancer management in the era of molecular classification: insights into pattern of recurrence

Incidence of sentinel lymph node metastases in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter observational study

Ultrastaging is accurate in detecting nodal metastases, but increases costs and may not be necessary in certain low-risk subgroups. In this study we examined the risk of nodal involvement detected by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a large population of apparent early-stage endometrial cancer and stratified by histopathologic characteristics. Furthermore, we aimed to identify a subgroup in which ultrastaging may be omitted. We retrospectively included patients who underwent SLN (with bilateral mapping and no empty nodal packets on final pathology) ± systematic lymphadenectomy for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer at two referral cancer centers. Lymph node status was determined by SLN only, regardless of non-SLN findings. The incidence of macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and isolated tumor cells (ITC) was measured in the overall population and after stratification by histotype (endometrioid vs serous), myometrial invasion (none, <50%, ≥50%), and grade (G1, G2, G3). Bilateral SLN mapping was accomplished in 1570 patients: 1359 endometrioid and 211 non-endometrioid, of which 117 were serous. The incidence of macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and ITC was 3.8%, 3.4%, and 4.8%, respectively. In patients with endometrioid histology (n=1359) there were 2.9% macrometastases, 3.2% micrometastases, and 5.3% ITC. No macro/micrometastases and only one ITC were found in a subset of 274 patients with low-grade (G1-G2) endometrioid endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion (all <1%). The incidence of micro/macrometastasis was higher, 2.8%, in 708 patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer invading <50% of the myometrium. In patients with serous histology (n=117), the incidence of macrometastases, micrometastasis, and ITC was 11.1%, 6.0%, and 1.7%, respectively. For serous carcinoma without myometrial invasion (n=36), two patients had micrometastases for an incidence of 5.6%. Ultrastaging may be safely omitted in patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion. No other subgroups with a risk of nodal metastasis of less than 1% have been identified.

Multi-center, international endometrial cancer consortium highlights

The multi-center, international consortium on endometrial cancer held in January 2025 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota brought together leading experts in gynecologic oncology to explore the latest advancements in the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of endometrial cancer. Discussions centered on key topics, including updates in molecular testing and disease staging, emerging treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent disease, fertility-sparing management, and critical pathology challenges, particularly, the assessment of lympho-vascular space invasion. Each topic was examined in dedicated working group sessions, fostering in-depth exchanges to identify research priorities and develop actionable strategies. This summary highlights the central themes and insights from the meeting, outlining a roadmap for future advancements in the field. By promoting inter-disciplinary collaboration, the meeting laid the foundation for future research, policy recommendations, and clinical innovations aimed at improving patient outcomes.

External validation of the annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer

The annual recurrence risk model (ARRM), developed by the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer consortium and endorsed by the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, predicts the annual risk of cervical cancer recurrence. However, it lacks an external validation, which we aimed to address in the current retrospective study. We included patients with pathology confirmed T1a to T2b cervical cancers who underwent radical surgery at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan from January 2010 to December 2022. Using the ARRM risk calculator, patients were assigned a score from 0 to 100 points, which allowed classification into 5 risk groups (0, 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100 points). Differences in 5-year disease-free survival were evaluated through log-rank tests with pairwise comparisons. Annual risk of recurrence was calculated using conditional survival analysis. Overall, 411 patients with cervical cancers were included: 0 (0.0%) scored 0 points, 149 (36.3%) scored 1 to 25 points, 224 (54.5%) scored 26 to 50 points, 37 (9.0%) scored 51 to 75 points, and 1 (0.2%) scored 76 to 100 points. The patient from 76 to 100 points was excluded from further analyses. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 96.3% (95% CI 90.0 to 98.6), 85.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 89.9%), and 66.6% (95% CI 47.3% to 80.2%) in groups 1 to 25, 26 to 50, and 51 to 75 points, respectively (p < .01). Compared with 26 to 50 and 51 to 75 points, the annual risk of recurrence was lower in the 1 to 25 points group, at around 1% from year 1 to 5. The ARRM tool confirmed its validity in stratifying cervical cancer into groups with significantly different disease-free survival rates in an independent large population from a tertiary center. The annual risk of recurrence should be carefully considered when tailoring follow-up, always taking into account the patient's perspective.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: results from an international, multi-institutional study

This study assessed oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells (ITC) (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Patients with SLN-ITC diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 were identified from 19 centers worldwide, while SLN-negative patients were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 2014 and 2018. Only patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (low-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion ≥50%; high-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion <50%) were included. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated by grouping patients according to prognostic factors: SLN-ITC and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). SLN-ITC patients with post-operative observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone were compared with similar node-negative patients. Of the 166 patients included, those with simultaneous presence of SLN-ITC and LVSI were at higher risk of non-vaginal recurrence (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17 to 11.84], p = .01) compared with patients who were node-negative with no LVSI. Among the 122 patients (28 SLN-ITC, 94 node-negative) who underwent post-operative observation or VB alone, 1 isolated vaginal recurrence was documented in a node-negative patient, while non-vaginal recurrence occurred in 3 of 28 (10.7%) SLN-ITC and 7 of 94 (7.4%) node-negative patients. The median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range; 1.8-3.0) among the remaining 25 ITC patients and 2.8 years (interquartile range; 0.8-4.2) among the remaining 87 node-negative patients. There was no difference in non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7% to 100.0%] vs node-negative: 82.2% [95% CI 69.1% to 97.9%], p = .46) or overall survival (SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3 to 100.0] vs node-negative: 84.5% [95% CI 75.0 to 95.2], p = .28) between the 2 cohorts. In patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (including patients who received chemotherapy/external beam radiotherapy), the combination of SLN-ITC and LVSI was associated with worse prognosis compared with patients with no risk factors or only 1 risk factor. In the sub-group of patients who received post-operative observation or VB alone, SLN-ITC did not worsen prognosis relative to node-negative patients.

Outcomes of low-risk endometrial cancer with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, observational study (ENDO-ITC study)

It is unclear whether isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) adversely affect prognosis, especially in low-risk endometrial cancer. In a retrospective study, we showed a worse recurrence-free survival for low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs than the node-negative group. Our aim is to evaluate whether the likelihood of disease recurrence differs between a prospective cohort of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs and an historical cohort with negative SLNs. We hypothesize that patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs will have a worse recurrence-free survival than patients who are node-negative. This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs in the SLNs will be accrued. Observation only will be suggested after surgery. We will include patients with endometrial cancer undergoing pelvic SLN biopsy and ultra-staging with the following characteristics: endometrioid histology, grades 1 to 2, <50% myometrial invasion, without substantial/extensive lympho-vascular space invasion. ITCs in SLNs are defined as tumor cell aggregates ≤0.2 mm or <200 cells. The primary end point is recurrence-free survival, measured from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence, death, or last disease evaluation. With a sample size of 132 women with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs, a 1-sided log-rank test achieves 85% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect an HR of 2.1. The expected number of events during the study is 17.3. The study duration will be 60 months: 24 for enrollment and 36 for follow-up. The results are expected in 2029. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06689956.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: results from an international multi-institutional study

The prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of endometrial cancer patients is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in patients with low risk endometrial cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were compared with node negative patients. Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells between 2013 and 2019 were identified from 15 centers worldwide, while SLN negative patients were identified from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2013 and 2018. Only low risk patients (stage IA, endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2) who did not receive any adjuvant therapy were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence free, non-vaginal recurrence free, and overall survival, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. 494 patients (42 isolated tumor cells and 452 node negative) were included. There were 21 (4.3%) recurrences (5 SLNs-isolated tumor cells, 16 node negative); recurrence was vaginal in six patients (1 isolated tumor cells, 5 node negative), and non-vaginal in 15 (4 isolated tumor cells, 11 node negative). Median follow-up among those without recurrence was 2.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-3.0) and 2.6 years (IQR 0.6-4.2) in the SLN-isolated tumor cell and node negative patients, respectively. The presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells, lymphovascular space invasion, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) grade 2 were significant risk factors for recurrence on univariate analysis. SLN-isolated tumor cell patients had worse recurrence free survival (p<0.01) and non-vaginal recurrence free survival (p<0.01) compared with node negative patients. Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients without lymphovascular space invasion (n=480). There was no difference in overall survival between the two cohorts in the full sample and the subset excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells and low risk profile, without adjuvant therapy, had a significantly worse recurrence free survival compared with node negative patients with similar risk factors, after adjusting for grade and excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. However, the presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells was not associated with worse overall survival.

Prognostic value of perioperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in endometrial cancer with high-risk features: a prospective observational study.

Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising prognostic tool in various malignancies, evidence in endometrial cancer at high risk of recurrence is limited. This study evaluated the association of pre- and post-surgical ctDNA with advanced-stage disease, disease-free and overall survival in endometrial cancer with high-risk features. This prospective observational study was conducted at Mayo Clinic (7/2016-6/2021). Patients with endometrial cancer at preoperative biopsy, confirmed by final pathology, were included. Blood samples were collected before and 10 weeks after surgery. Tumor-specific junctions identified in pathology specimens and blood samples were used to detect ctDNA. Associations between pre- and post-surgical ctDNA and advanced-stage disease, recurrence, and death were evaluated using logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval] and Cox proportional hazards [hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval]. Thirty-six patients were included: 6 (16.7 %) intermediate risk, 1 (2.8 %) high-intermediate risk, 28 (77.8 %) high risk, and 1 (2.8 %) advanced metastatic. Detection of pre- or post-surgical ctDNA was not significantly associated with advanced disease (pre-surgical OR 5.69 [0.88-66.02]; post-surgical OR 5.86 [0.83-72.68]). Pre-surgical ctDNA did not significantly predict recurrence (HR 0.99 [0.30-3.23]) or death (HR 3.23 [0.40-25.91]). In contrast, post-surgical ctDNA was associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR 3.32 [1.05-10.51]) and death (HR 5.97 [1.11-36.08]). Post-surgical ctDNA detection was associated with poor outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. These findings support the potential of ctDNA as a biomarker to personalize surveillance and guide post-surgical treatment strategies.