Investigator

Lisa M Klesges

Professor of Surgery · Washington University in Saint Louis, Div of Public Health Sciences

LMKLisa M Klesges
Papers(1)
Self-sampling tools t…
Collaborators(8)
Mack T. RuffinPaul L. ReiterTracy OnegaGeorge GarrowJennifer L. MossJiangang LiaoJuliette EntenmanKelsey C. Stoltzfus
Institutions(6)
Taylor Family Institu…Hershey United StatesThe Ohio State Univer…Huntsman Cancer Insti…Unknown InstitutionPennsylvania State Un…

Papers

Self-sampling tools to increase cancer screening among underserved patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Screening can reduce cancer mortality, but uptake is suboptimal and characterized by disparities. Home-based self-sampling can facilitate screening for colorectal cancer (with stool tests, eg, fecal immunochemical tests) and for cervical cancer (with self-collected human papillomavirus tests), especially among patients who face barriers to accessing health care. Additional data are needed on feasibility and potential effects of self-sampling tools for cancer screening among underserved patients. Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial with patients (female, ages 50-65 years, out of date with colorectal and cervical cancer screening) recruited from federally qualified health centers in rural and racially segregated counties in Pennsylvania. Participants in the standard-of-care arm (n = 24) received screening reminder letters. Participants in the self-sampling arm (n = 24) received self-sampling tools for fecal immunochemical tests and human papillomavirus testing. We assessed uptake of screening (10-week follow-up), self-sampling screening outcomes, and psychosocial variables. Analyses used Fisher exact tests to assess the effect of study arm on outcomes. Results Cancer screening was higher in the self-sampling arm than the standard-of-care arm (colorectal: 75% vs 13%, respectively, odds ratio = 31.32, 95% confidence interval = 5.20 to 289.33; cervical: 79% vs 8%, odds ratio = 72.03, 95% confidence interval = 9.15 to 1141.41). Among participants who returned the self-sampling tools, the prevalence of abnormal findings was 24% for colorectal and 18% for cervical cancer screening. Cancer screening knowledge was positively associated with uptake (P < .05). Conclusions Self-sampling tools can increase colorectal and cervical cancer screening among unscreened, underserved patients. Increasing the use of self-sampling tools can improve primary care and cancer detection among underserved patients. Clinical Trials Registration Number STUDY00015480.

129Works
1Papers
8Collaborators

Positions

2019–

Professor of Surgery

Washington University in Saint Louis · Div of Public Health Sciences

2008–

Founding Dean Emerita

University of Memphis · School of Public Health

Country

US

Links & IDs
0000-0001-6237-4743

Scopus: 7003419229