Investigator

Liron Pantanowitz

University Of Pittsburgh

LPLiron Pantanowitz
Papers(6)
Assessment of the eff…Analysis of the sensi…Diagnostic performanc…Volunteering at Cervi…Improving the Pap tes…The evolution of cerv…
Institutions(1)
University Of Pittsbu…

Papers

Analysis of the sensitivity of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap diagnosis and interobserver variability with the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System

AbstractBackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI)–based systems are transforming cytopathology practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Papanicolaou (Pap) diagnosis assisted by the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System (GDDS).MethodsA validation study was performed with 890 ThinPrep Pap tests with the GDDS independently. From this set, a subset of 183 cases originally interpreted as HSIL confirmed histologically were included in this study. The sensitivity for detecting HSIL by three cytopathologists was calculated.ResultsMost HSIL cases were classified as atypical glandular cell/atypical squamous cell–high grade not excluded (AGC/ASC‐H) and above by all cytopathologists. Of these cases, 11.5% were classified as low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) by pathologist A (P‐A), 6% by pathologist B (P‐B), and 5.5% by pathologist C (P‐C); 3.8%, 2.7%, and 1.6% of these cases were classified as atypical squamous cell of unknown significance (ASC‐US) by P‐A, P‐B, and P‐C, respectively. The sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and above (CIN2+) lesions was 100% if ASC‐US and above (ASC‐US+) abnormalities were counted among all three pathologists. The sensitivity for detection of CIN2+ lesions was 84.7%, 91.3%, and 92.9% by P‐A, P‐B, and P‐C, respectively, for ASC‐H and above abnormalities. The Kendall W coefficient was 0.722, which indicated strong agreement between all pathologists.ConclusionsNew‐generation AI‐assisted Pap test screening systems such as the GDDS have the potential to transform cytology practice. In this study, the GDDS aided in interpreting HSIL in ThinPrep Pap tests, with good sensitivity and agreement between the pathologists who interacted with this system.

Diagnostic performance of the hologic genius digital diagnostics system for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) ThinPrep papanicolaou tests

Advancements in digital imaging technology for Papanicolaou test slides, combined with artificial intelligence are driving the development and adoption of innovative computer-assisted screening methods for cervical cancer within the cytology community. Our study aimed to assess the performance of the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostic System (HGDDS) in the interpretation of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in ThinPrep Papanicolaou slides. As part of a validation study performed with 890 ThinPrep Papanicolaou slides using the HGDDS, a subset of 146 LSIL cases were included in this study. Performance characteristics for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and interobserver variability among 3 cytopathologists were assessed. On evaluation of the consensus results of the 3 cytopathologists, of the 146 LSIL Papanicolaou cases, 60.3% were interpreted as LSIL with the HGDDS. The remainder were interpreted as ASCUS (26%), ASC-H (10.3%), HSIL (2.7%), and NILM (0.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting CIN1+ lesions in the ASCUS + category with the HGDDS were 100%, 25%, 97.9%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the detection of CIN1+ lesions in the LSIL + category with the HGDDS were 74.7%, 75%, 99.1%, and 7.7%, respectively. Kendall's W coefficient was 0.792, indicating strong agreement among participating pathologists. Our study demonstrated that ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests with LSIL could be interpreted with strong agreement among pathologists and with good performance indicators when utilizing the HGDDS.

71Works
6Papers
CytodiagnosisThyroid NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialBiomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsSalivary Gland NeoplasmsAdenocarcinoma, FollicularThyroid Cancer, Papillary