LWLingying Wu
Papers(7)
Suvemcitug plus chemo…PARPis response and o…Overview of fuzulopar…Fuzuloparib Maintenan…Efficacy and Safety o…ALKBH5-mediated m6A m…Effect of prior adjuv…
Collaborators(10)
Qi ZhouNing LiLi WangMei XuMichael WongQi LiuQingshui LiQin XuRachel NgRutie Yin
Institutions(10)
Chinese Academy Of Me…Chongqing University …Affiliated Hospital o…Xuzhou Central Hospit…Royal London HospitalUT health at San Anto…Shandong Cancer Hospi…Fujian Provincial Can…Hong Kong Rfid ChinaWest China Second Uni…

Papers

Suvemcitug plus chemotherapy in women with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the SCORES randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 trial

Abstract In the SCORES study ( NCT04908787 ), women with ovarian cancer that progressed within 6 months after completing platinum-based therapy were randomized (2:1) to receive suvemcitug (1.5 mg kg −1 ), an antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor or placebo every 2 weeks, with chemotherapy (paclitaxel, topotecan or PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, quality of life, safety, pharmacokinetics and antidrug antibodies. Between June 5, 2021 and October 11, 2024, 421 participants were randomized (49.4% and 49.4% previously exposed to antiangiogenic agents and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, respectively). Median PFS was 5.5 and 2.7 months in the suvemcitug and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35–0.60, P  < 0.001), meeting the primary endpoint. Median OS was 15.3 versus 14.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–0.99, P  = 0.03). Decreased neutrophil count and decreased white blood cell count were the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the suvemcitug arm. No suvemcitug-related grade 5 TEAE occurred. In conclusion, the addition of suvemcitug to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS, with tolerable toxicities.

PARPis response and outcome of ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation and a history of breast cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) response and outcome of ovarian cancer (OC) patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation and a history of breast cancer (BC). Thirty-nine OC patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation and a history of BC were included. The clinicopathological characteristics, PARPis response and prognosis were analyzed. The median interval from BC to OC diagnosis was 115.3 months (range=6.4-310.1). A total of 38 patients (38/39, 97.4%) received platinum-based chemotherapy after surgical removal. The majority of these patients were reported to be platinum sensitive (92.1%, 35/38). 21 patients (53.8%) received PARPis treatment with 16 patients (76.2%) for maintenance treatment and 5 patients (5/21, 23.8%) for salvage treatment. The median duration for PARPis maintenance and salvage treatment was 14.9 months (range=2.0-56.9) and 8.2 months (range=5.2-20.7), respectively. In the entire cohort, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rate was 33.1% and 78.9%, respectively. Patients with BRCA1 mutation had a non-significantly worse 5-year PFS (28.6% vs. 45.8%, p=0.346) and 5-year OS (76.9% vs. 83.3%, p=0.426) than those with BRCA2 mutation. In patients with stage III-IV (n=31), first line PARPis maintenance treatment associated with a non-significantly better PFS (median PFS: NR vs. 22.4 months; 5-year PFS: 64.3% vs. 21.9%, p=0.096). The current study shows that these patients may have a good response to platinum-based chemotherapy and a favorable survival. And these patients can benefit from PARPis treatment and will likely be suitable candidates for PARPis.

Fuzuloparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma (FZOCUS-2): A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE This phase III trial aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fuzuloparib (formerly fluzoparib) versus placebo as a maintenance treatment after response to second- or later-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer previously treated with at least two platinum-based regimens were assigned (2:1) to receive fuzuloparib (150 mg, twice daily) or matching placebo for 28-day cycles. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) in the overall population and PFS by BIRC in the subpopulation with germline BRCA 1/2 mutation. RESULTS Between April 30, 2019, and January 10, 2020, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the fuzuloparib (n = 167) or placebo (n = 85). As of July 1, 2020, the median PFS per BIRC assessment in the overall population was significantly improved with fuzuloparib treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.36; one-sided P < .0001) compared with that with placebo. The HR derived from a prespecified subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend of benefit in patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.28) or in those without mutations (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the fuzuloparib group were anemia (25.1%), decreased platelet count (16.8%), and decreased neutrophil count (12.6%). Only one patient (0.6%) discontinued fuzuloparib because of treatment-related toxicity (concurrent decreased white blood cell count and neutrophil count). CONCLUSION Fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer versus placebo, regardless of germline BRCA 1/2 mutation, and showed a manageable safety profile.

Efficacy and Safety of the Anti–PD-L1 mAb Socazolimab for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: a Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study

Abstract Purpose: This study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03676959) is an open, phase I dose-escalation and expansion study investigating the safety and efficacy of the recombinant, fully human anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) mAb socazolimab in patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients received socazolimab every 2 weeks until disease progression. The study was divided into a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Safety and tolerability were primary endpoints of the dose-escalation phase. The primary endpoints of the dose-expansion phase were safety and the objective response rate (ORR) of the 5 mg/kg dose. Efficacy was assessed by the third-party independent review committee (IRC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Results: 104 patients were successfully enrolled into the study. Twelve patients were included in the dose-escalation phase, with one complete response and two partial responses in the 5 mg/kg treatment group. Ninety-two patients (5 mg/kg) were enrolled in the dose-expansion phase. Fifty-four patients (59.3%) had baseline PD-L1–positive tumor expression (combined positive score ≥1). ORR was 15.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.7%–24.5%]. Median PFS was 4.44 months (95% CI, 2.37–5.75 months), and the median OS was 14.72 months (95% CI, 9.59–NE months). ORR of PD-L1–positive patients was 16.7%, and the ORR of PD-L1–negative patients was 17.9%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that socazolimab has durable safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer and exhibits a safety profile similar to other anti–PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs.

ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification of circCCDC134 facilitates cervical cancer metastasis by enhancing HIF1A transcription

AbstractBackgroundMetastasis is the main cause of mortality in cervical cancer (CC). Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been demonstrated to play a crucial role in carcinoma biology. However, the expression and function of circRNAs in cervical cancer metastasis are still unclear.MethodsIn the present study, we identified a circRNA with an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, circCCDC134, whose expression was increased in CC tissues by circRNA-Seq and qPCR. CircCCDC134 upregulation in CC was fine-tuned by ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification, which enhanced its stability in a YTHDF2-dependent manner. The functional experiments illustrated that circCCDC134 enhanced tumour proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. For the comprehensive identification of RNA-binding proteins, circRNA pull-down and mass spectrometry (ChIRP-MS), chromatin immunoprecipitation-seq (Chip-seq), RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) and luciferase reporter assays were used to perform mechanistic investigations.ResultsThe results revealed that circCCDC134 recruited p65 in the nucleus and acted as a miR-503-5p sponge to regulate the expression of MYB in the cytoplasm, ultimately stimulating HIF1A transcription and facilitating CC growth and metastasis. Conclusion: These findings indicate that circCCDC134 is an important therapeutic target and provide new regulatory model insights for exploring the carcinogenic mechanism of circCCDC134 in CC.

Effect of prior adjuvant radiotherapy on immunotherapy outcomes in recurrent endometrial cancer

This study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) following initial surgery on the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent initial surgery for endometrial cancer and received immunotherapy for recurrence between January 2020 and December 2023 were recruited. Patients who received post-operative EBRT were assigned to the EBRT group. Patients who did not undergo EBRT or who received brachytherapy without EBRT were assigned to the control group. Progression-free survival was used as the end point. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for comparing progression-free survival. The multi-variate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis; 33 had a history of EBRT, while 58 had not received prior EBRT. In Kaplan-Meier curves, patients who did not receive EBRT showed a numerically lower risk of disease progression (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90, p = .010). In multi-variate analysis, EBRT (HR 5.28, 95% CI 1.54 to 22.06) and proficient mismatch repair/micro-satellite instability-low/micro-satellite stable status (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.19 to 8.90) were risk factors for disease progression during immunotherapy. In patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who received immunotherapy, the therapeutic efficacy may be compromised by prior post-operative adjuvant EBRT.

1Works
7Papers
39Collaborators
2Trials
Ovarian NeoplasmsNeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, Tumor