Investigator

Line Bjørge

University Of Bergen

LBLine Bjørge
Papers(9)
Altered exosomal <scp…Consensus on drivers …Real-world data on ni…<scp><i>TP53</i></scp…Advanced endometrial …The <scp>WID‐EC</scp>…A Simple Cervicovagin…A phase 1b, multicent…Beyond HRD Status: Un…
Collaborators(10)
Chiara HerzogKarin SundströmEmma J CrosbieJoakim DillnerPaula Peremiquel-Tril…Martin WidschwendterMaria DimoulaMaria Pilar Barretina…Maria RossingMarta Pineda
Institutions(10)
University Of BergenKing's College LondonKarolinska University…The University of Man…Institut Dinvestigaci…Leopold-Franzens-Univ…Uppsala University Ho…Institut Catal Doncol…University Of Copenha…Instituto De Salud Ca…

Papers

Altered exosomal miRNA profiles in patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration

AbstractObjectivePatients with ovarian cancer (OC) may develop anti‐Yo‐associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD)—a cerebellar ataxia associated with tumor‐induced autoimmunity against CDR2 and CDR2L proteins. Dysregulation of circulating exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) occur in OC. Here, we investigated whether PCD is associated with changes in the exosomal miRNA profiles of OC patients.MethodsSerum exosomes were isolated from patients with OC (n = 15), patients with OC and anti‐Yo‐associated PCD (n = 14) and healthy controls (HC, n = 15). Small RNA sequencing was used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate biomarker sensitivity and specificity, and miRNA target prediction analysis was employed to elucidate gene targets.ResultsOC patients with PCD exhibited a distinct exosomal miRNA expression profile. We detected 103 differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs in PCD patients compared to OC patients without PCD and 139 differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs compared to controls. Particularly miR‐486‐5p, miR‐4732‐5p, miR‐98‐5p and miR‐21‐5p exhibited notable sensitivity and specificity for discriminating PCD patients from both OC patients without PCD and healthy controls. miRNA target prediction showed that several of the differentially expressed miRNAs in PCD patients targeted the CDR2 and CDR2L genes.InterpretationOur results demonstrate that OC patients with anti‐Yo‐associated PCD exhibit a distinct exosomal miRNA profile compared to OC patients without PCD. Several of the differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs in PCD patients showed diagnostic potential and may hold relevance for understanding the pathogenesis of PCD.

Consensus on drivers of maintenance treatment choice and patterns of care in advanced ovarian cancer

Maintenance therapies, including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and/or bevacizumab, have substantially improved the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Owing to the variability in treatment strategies across Europe, a Delphi study was conducted among European experts to understand the heterogeneity of clinical practice and identify key factors driving maintenance treatment decisions for advanced ovarian cancer. A pragmatic literature review was conducted to identify key questions regarding maintenance treatment strategies in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Utilizing a Delphi methodology, consensus was assessed among a panel of 16 experts using a questionnaire based on results of the pragmatic literature review. Panelists agreed that BRCA mutation and homologous recombination status should be assessed in parallel at diagnosis, and that first-line platinum chemotherapy may be initiated concurrently. There was a consensus that alternative homologous recombination deficiency tests are acceptable provided they are clinically validated. Panelists agreed that Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) scores can help assess tumor chemosensitivity and guide treatment-related decisions. Panelists defined high-risk disease as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease or stage III with residual disease after initial/ interval cytoreduction. Risk of disease progression was a key determinant of choice between PARP inhibitor, bevacizumab, or both in combination, as maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Key drivers for selecting advanced ovarian cancer maintenance treatments include tumor mutational status as a key biomarker and clinician perception of the risk for early disease progression.

Real-world data on niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with non-gBRCA mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

The aim of this study was to provide real-world efficacy and safety data on niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with non-germline (gBRCA)1/2 mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. This retrospective multi-center cohort study included 94 platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients without known gBRCA1/2 mutation treated in an individual patient access program in Norway. The primary outcome was time from start of niraparib treatment to first subsequent treatment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, safety, and tolerability. After median follow-up of 13.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0 to 16.8), 68.1% had progressed and 22.3% had died. Of the entire cohort, 61.7% had commenced a new line of treatment, and 24.5% were still receiving niraparib. The median duration of niraparib treatment was 5.0 months (range 0.4 to 27.3), and the median time to first subsequent treatment was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.4 to 13.0). Patients with elevated CA125 prior to start of niraparib had shorter time to first subsequent treatment (7.3 months, 95% CI 4.2 to 10.3) than patients with normalized CA125 (12.2 months, 95% CI 10.9 to 13.7 (p=0.002). Patients who started on individual dose based on weight and platelet counts had fewer dose reductions (p<0.001) and interruptions (p=0.02). In a real-world setting, niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with non-gBRCA1/2 mutated recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer showed effectiveness comparable with published phase III studies and acceptable safety. Individualized dosing is essential to minimize adverse events. CA125 levels at start of niraparib treatment may help to estimate the individual prognosis.

TP53 mutation and human papilloma virus status as independent prognostic factors in a Norwegian cohort of vulva squamous cell carcinoma

AbstractIntroductionVulva squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) develops through two separate molecular pathways—one involving high‐risk human papilloma virus infection (HPV‐associated), and the other without HPV infection (HPV‐independent) often involving TP53 mutation. HPV‐associated VSCC generally has a better progression‐free survival than HPV‐independent VSCC. The aim of this study was to determine TP53 mutation status using immunohistochemistry, compare different methods of HPV detection and correlate both with survival in a retrospective cohort of 123 patients with VSCC.Material and methodsImmunohistochemistry for p53, Ki67 and p16INK4A (a surrogate marker for HPV infection) was performed on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissues from a cohort of surgically treated VSCC patients to identify molecular subtypes of VSCC. Presence of HPV infection was detected by HPV DNA PCR and HPV mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH). The Pearson chi‐square test and multivariable Cox regression model were used to investigate the association of different parameters with progression‐free survival and disease‐specific survival (DSS), and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to show the association of different parameters with survival.ResultsThe results of p53 and p16INK4A immunohistochemistry confirmed three VSCC subtypes associated with different prognosis. The TP53 mutation status was identified as an independent prognostic factor of worse progression‐free survival (p = 0.024) after adjustment for FIGO stage. p16INK4A immunohistochemistry, mRNA ISH, and DNA PCR had excellent concordance in terms of HPV detection. According to the multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of hrHPV mRNA correlated significantly with increased progression‐free survival (p = 0.040) and DSS (p = 0.045), after adjustment for other confounders.Conclusionsp53 and p16INK4A immunohistochemistry stratify VSCC cohort into three subtypes with TP53mutated patients having the worst prognosis. The detection of hrHPV mRNA by ISH was an independent predictor of increased survival. Thus, the combined detection of p53 and HPV mRNA might improve risk stratification in VSCC.

The WID‐EC test for the detection and risk prediction of endometrial cancer

AbstractThe incidence of endometrial cancer is rising. Measures to identify women at risk and to detect endometrial cancer earlier are required to reduce the morbidity triggered by the aggressive treatment required for advanced endometrial cancer. We developed the WID‐EC (Women's cancer risk IDentification‐Endometrial Cancer) test, which is based on DNA methylation at 500 CpG sites, in a discovery set of cervical liquid‐based cytology samples from 1086 women with and without an endometrial cancer (217 cancer cases and 869 healthy controls) with a worse prognosis (grade 3 or ≥stage IB). We validated the WID‐EC test in an independent external validation set of 64 endometrial cancer cases and 225 controls. We further validated the test in 150 healthy women (prospective set) who provided a cervical sample as part of the routine Swedish cervical screening programme, 54 of whom developed endometrial cancer within 3 years of sample collection. The WID‐EC test identified women with endometrial cancer with a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88‐0.97) in the external set and of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74‐0.89) in the prospective validation set. Using an optimal cutoff, cancer cases were detected with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 90% in the external validation set, and a sensitivity and specificity of 52% and 98% respectively in the prospective validation set. The WID‐EC test can identify women with or at risk of endometrial cancer.

A Simple Cervicovaginal Epigenetic Test for Screening and Rapid Triage of Women With Suspected Endometrial Cancer: Validation in Several Cohort and Case/Control Sets

PURPOSE Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence has been rising over the past 10 years. Delays in diagnosis reduce survival and necessitate more aggressive treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a simple, noninvasive, and reliable triage test for EC to reduce the number of invasive diagnostic procedures and improve patient survival. METHODS We developed a test to screen and triage women with suspected EC using 726 cervical smear samples from women with and without EC, and validated the test in 562 cervicovaginal samples using three different collection methods (cervical smear: n = 248; vaginal swab: n = 63; and self-collection: n = 251) and four different settings (case/control: n = 388; cohort of women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding: n = 63; a cohort of high-risk women with Lynch syndrome: n = 25; and a nested case/control setting from a screening cohort and samples taken up to 3 years before EC diagnosis: n = 86). RESULTS We describe the Women's cancer risk IDentification – quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for Endometrial Cancer (WID-qEC), a three-marker test that evaluates DNA methylation in gene regions of GYPC and ZSCAN12. In cervical, self-collected, and vaginal swab samples derived from symptomatic patients, it detected EC with sensitivities of 97.2% (95% CI, 90.2 to 99.7), 90.1% (83.6 to 94.6), and 100% (63.1 to 100), respectively, and specificities of 75.8% (63.6 to 85.5), 86.7% (79.3 to 92.2), and 89.1% (77.8 to 95.9), respectively. The WID-qEC identified 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8 to 98.9) of EC cases in samples predating diagnosis up to 1 year. Test performance was similar across menopausal status, age, stage, grade, ethnicity, and histology. CONCLUSION The WID-qEC is a noninvasive reliable test for triage of women with symptoms suggestive of ECs. Because of the potential for self-collection, it could improve early diagnosis and reduce the reliance for in-person visits.

A phase 1b, multicentre, dose escalation, safety and pharmacokinetics study of tilvestamab (BGB149) in relapsed, platinum-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (PROC) patients

Abstract Background Tilvestamab is a highly selective humanised immunoglobulin G1 anti-AXL monoclonal antibody. This phase 1 study evaluated its optimal dose, safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) in relapsed platinum-resistant HGSOC patients. Methods Patients received tilvestamab in three dose levels (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) via IV infusion every 2 weeks. Primary objectives included safety, tolerability and PK. Exploratory objectives included overall response, progression-free survival (PFS) and quality-of-life measures. Pharmacodynamic included AXL expression, gene and protein changes by transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Results Between 25 February 2021 and 4 February 2022, 16 patients were enroled across 8 sites in Singapore, Korea, United Kingdom, and Norway. Median treatment duration was 6.1 weeks. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 62.5% patients, but none were tilvestamab-related. Common events included fatigue (38%), anorexia (38%) infections (31%), anaemia (25%) and dyspnoea (25%). No objective responses were observed, but 7 (44%) had stable disease at 6 weeks. PK showed dose-proportional exposure and steady-state by the second dose. Pharmacodynamic analyses revealed reduced fibrosis-related gene signatures and AXL protein expression. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition reversal was seen in 2 patients. Conclusion Tilvestamab was well-tolerated and further studies to examine the efficacy of AXL inhibition in other indications are required. Clinical trial registration This trial is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: NCT04893551. EudraCT Number: 2020-001382-36

Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Abstract The management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC) has undergone significant advancements with the emergence of molecular diagnostics, particularly in predicting responses to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. However, understanding sensitivity and resistance beyond HRD status remains elusive. This study aims to explore molecular factors that may elucidate why HRD status does not consistently predict PARPi sensitivity. Therefore, we conducted a post hoc translational analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA part 1 and 2 trial (NCT02354131), focusing on alterations pertaining radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS). DNA sequencing was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 HT gene panel, with variants classified according to recent guidelines. HRD status had been assessed by Myriad MyChoice CDx. We identified, among 92 patients in the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA part 1 and 2 trial, 151 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants across 81 samples. PARPi-sensitizing variants were found in two out of 10 HRD-negative samples from patients with clinical benefit (PFS ≥12 months), whereas three out of 10 HRD-positive samples from patients having no benefit (PFS ≤6 months) harbored variants associated with PARPi resistance. Additionally, analysis of BRCA1 variants revealed that truncating variants in exon 11 correlated with clinical benefit when niraparib was combined with bevacizumab. Conclusively, our findings highlight the complexity of PARPi response in AOC and underscore the importance of exploring somatic variants beyond HRD status. Further investigation into exon 11 variants of BRCA1 and the potential of combination treatment is warranted. Significance: The irregular response to PARPi in HRD-positive and -negative tumors highlights the need for identifying additional biomarkers. This study explores the mutational landscape beyond HRD status in AOC, ultimately advancing precision oncology in future clinical practice.

Clinical Trials (4)

NCT07400835University of Aarhus

Evaluation of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected Urine and Vaginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the clinical utility of DNA-methylation testing in urine and vaginal samples collected by patients and cervical samples collected by clinicians, to determine the risk of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women with postmenopausal bleeding. The study aims to answer the following research questions: * What is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in urine, vaginal and cervical samples compared to traditional TVUS for endometrial cancer detection? * What is the 2-year risk of EC among women testing negative on TVUS and/or DNA methylation tests or those testing positive on methylation only? Researchers will compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples as well as in clinician-collected cervical samples, with the traditional diagnostic pathway for women with PMB, which includes TVUS evaluation, and when indicated by abnormal TVUS findings, endometrial biopsy according to clinical guidelines. Participants will * take a urine and vaginal sample * have a cervical sample collected by a clinician * undergo TVUS evaluation according to clinical guidelines * If TVUS shows thickened endometrium (≥ 5 mm) and/or irregularity, an endometrial biopsy will be collected according to clinical guidelines * fill out a questionnaire regarding acceptability and preferences of sampling methods and complete a lifestyle questionnaire.

20Works
9Papers
63Collaborators
4Trials
Ovarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmPapillomavirus InfectionsVulvar NeoplasmsEarly Detection of Cancer

Education

2010

MBA

ESSEC Business School and Mannheim Business School

1995

dr.med.

University of Bergen · Faculty of Medicine

1992

MD

University of Bergen · Faculty of Medicine

Country

NO

Links & IDs
0000-0002-0240-2770

Researcher Id: C-1307-2017