Lindsay J Collin

Neighborhood disorder and ovarian cancer survival in Black women

Abstract Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality among women in the US. Black women experience significantly lower OC survival than White women. Evidence suggests that this disparity is not solely the result of barriers to healthcare access but may also be impacted by other factors, including neighborhood social characteristics. To investigate this further, this study developed an approach for remotely estimating the degree of physical disorder (PD) in neighborhoods using structured audits of Google Street View imagery for participants in the AACES, a multi-site population-based study of Black women newly diagnosed with OC. We then assessed whether neighborhood disadvantage (ND) and PD were associated with overall survival. We fit Weibull accelerated failure time models to assess the association of both PD and ND with survival among 471 Black women with OC (n = 317 deaths). Both PD (event time ratio (ETR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98, 1.00) and Area Deprivation Index (ETR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00) were associated with shorter survival. The results suggest that both physical and social neighborhood characteristics may impact survival in woman with OC, but further research is warranted.

Patterns of Associations with Epidemiologic Factors by High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Gene Expression Subtypes

Abstract Background: Ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) comprise four distinct molecular subtypes based on mRNA expression patterns, with differential survival. Understanding risk factor associations is important to elucidate the etiology of HGSC. We investigated associations between different epidemiologic risk factors and HGSC molecular subtypes. Methods: We pooled data from 11 case–control studies with epidemiologic and tumor gene expression data from custom NanoString CodeSets developed through a collaboration within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. The PrOTYPE-validated NanoString-based 55-gene classifier was used to assign HGSC gene expression subtypes. We examined associations between epidemiologic factors and HGSC subtypes in 2,070 cases and 16,633 controls using multivariable-adjusted polytomous regression models. Results: Among the 2,070 HGSC cases, 556 (27%) were classified as C1.MES, 340 (16%) as C5.PRO, 538 (26%) as C2.IMM, and 636 (31%) as C4.DIF. The key factors, including oral contraceptive use, parity, breastfeeding, and family history of ovarian cancer, were similarly associated with all subtypes. Heterogeneity was observed for several factors. Former smoking [OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03, 1.51] and genital powder use (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.08, 1.86) were uniquely associated with C2.IMM. History of endometriosis was associated with C5.PRO (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.98, 2.16) and C4.DIF (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 0.94, 1.71) only. Family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.16, 1.78) and current smoking (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.76) were associated with C4.DIF only. Conclusions: This study observed heterogeneous associations of epidemiologic and modifiable factors with HGSC molecular subtypes. Impact: The different patterns of associations may provide key information about the etiology of the four subtypes.

Perceived discrimination, trust in physicians, and their associations with ovarian cancer mortality among women in the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study

Abstract Purpose Black women are 30% more likely to die of ovarian cancer than White women. Discrimination may affect cancer health disparities through pathways including socioeconomic disadvantage, chronic stress, and access to care. In this study, we evaluated associations of discrimination and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer. Methods Using data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), we included 592 Black ovarian cancer patients who completed an interview. Discrimination and trust in physicians were measured using the Everyday Discrimination, Major Experiences of Discrimination, and Trust in Physicians scales, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associating everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality. Results Approximately 43% reported experiencing at least one major experience of discrimination, 16% reported high everyday experiences of discrimination, and the median trust in physician score was 35. The association between higher experiences of everyday discrimination was HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.11), compared with low experiences of everyday discrimination. We observed that more major experiences of discrimination had 1.25-times the mortality rate compared with low experiences of major discrimination (95% CI: 0.84, 2.20). Higher trust in physicians was associated with slightly lower mortality rates (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.14). Conclusion We observed complexities in the relationships of everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer. Future work to understand the these relationships is likely warranted.

Comorbid conditions and survival among Black women with ovarian cancer

AbstractBackgroundBlack women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have worse survival and a higher burden of comorbid conditions compared with other racial groups. This study examines the association of comorbid conditions and medication use for these conditions with survival among Black women with EOC.MethodsIn a prospective study of 592 Black women with EOC, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) based on self‐reported data, three cardiometabolic comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia), and medication use for each cardiometabolic comorbidity were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the association of comorbid conditions and related medication use with all‐cause mortality while adjusting for relevant covariates overall and by histotype (high‐grade serous [HGS]/carcinosarcoma vs. non‐HGS/carcinosarcoma) and stage (I/II vs. III/IV).ResultsA CCI of ≥2 was observed in 42% of the cohort, and 21%, 67%, and 34% of women had a history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. After adjusting for prognostic factors, a CCI ≥2 (vs. 0; hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.71) and type 2 diabetes (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10–1.84) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. The increased risk of mortality for type 2 diabetes was present specifically among women with HGS/carcinosarcoma (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10–1.97) and among women with stage III/IV disease (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10–1.98). The authors did not find evidence that hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or medication use for the cardiometabolic comorbidities meaningfully impacted survival.ConclusionComorbid conditions, especially type 2 diabetes, had a significant adverse impact on survival among Black women with EOC.

Mortality Patterns of Synchronous Uterine and Ovarian Cancers: A SEER Registry Analysis

Abstract Background: The degree to which uterine cancer metastatic to the ovary is misdiagnosed as synchronous stage I uterine and ovarian cancers is unclear. We sought to determine whether patients with synchronous cancers had mortality patterns similar to either stage IIIA uterine, stage I uterine, or stage I ovarian cancers alone. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to compare mortality of patients with synchronous stage I uterine and stage I ovarian cancers versus those with stage IIIA uterine, stage I uterine, or stage I ovarian cancers alone. We calculated age-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) accounting for calendar year and grade, adjuvant treatment, grade 1 endometrioid cancers, grade 3 endometrioid cancers, and stage IA cancers. Results: Among the 9,321 patients, we observed lower age-adjusted mortality in patients with stage I synchronous cancers (n = 937) compared to those with stage IIIA uterine (n = 531; HR, 0.45 95% CI, 0.35–0.58), stage I uterine (n = 6,919; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60–0.91), and stage I ovarian cancers (n = 934; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41–0.67). Results were similar after taking into account diagnosis year and grade, and limiting to those receiving adjuvant therapy, grade 1 or grade 3 endometrioid cancers, or stage IA cancers. Conclusions: We observed lower mortality for synchronous stage I uterine and ovarian cancers, which was not explained by younger age, earlier stage, lower grade, histology type, or adjuvant therapy. Impact: The possible misdiagnosis associated with clinicopathologic of synchronous uterine and ovarian cancers does not appear to worsen survival on a population level.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Survival in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma by Self-Reported Race

Abstract Background: Half of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, HRD is not well characterized in Black individuals who experience worse survival after a diagnosis of HGSC. The objective of this study was to characterize ovarian HGSC HRD and examine its association with survival by self-reported race. Methods: HRD features were identified using matched tumor–normal whole-exome and RNA sequencing in an HGSC cohort. We calculated age- and stage-adjusted HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for survival, comparing individuals with a feature to those without, separately by self-reported race. Results: Any HRD was associated with a 32% reduced risk of death in Black individuals compared with a 62% reduction in White individuals (Black HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43–1.09; White HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–1.04). More of the germline and somatic variants detected among Black individuals were unannotated or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; germline 65% vs. 45%; somatic 62% vs. 50%). Black individuals with germline unannotated/VUS were more likely to have tumors with HRD scarring and a first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer compared with those without (HRD scar 71.4% vs. 49.6%; family history 68.4% vs. 34.6%). Conclusions: HRD testing informs precision-based medicine approaches that improve outcomes, but a higher proportion of VUS among Black individuals may complicate referral for such care leading to worse outcomes for Black individuals. Impact: Our findings emphasize the importance of recruiting diverse individuals in genomics research and better characterizing VUS.

Genomic Characterization of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Reveals Distinct Somatic Features in Black Individuals

Abstract Black individuals experience worse survival after a diagnosis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) than White individuals and are underrepresented in ovarian cancer research. To date, the understanding of the molecular and genomic heterogeneity of HGSC is based primarily on the evaluation of tumors from White individuals. In the present study, we performed whole-exome sequencing on HGSC samples from 211 Black patients to identify significantly mutated genes and characterize mutational signatures, assessing their distributions by gene expression subtypes. The occurrence and frequency of somatic mutations and signatures by self-reported race were compared with historic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Despite technical differences (e.g., formalin-fixed vs. fresh-frozen tissue), the distribution of mutations and their variant classifications for major HGSC genes were nearly identical across study populations. However, de novo significantly mutated gene analysis identified genes not previously reported in TCGA analysis, including the oncogene KRAS and the potential tumor suppressor OBSCN. The prevalence of the homologous recombination deficiency signature was higher among Black individuals with the immunoreactive gene expression subtype compared with the mesenchymal and proliferative subtypes. These findings were confirmed by comparing the data from Black patients with those from 123 White patients with identical tissue collection and processing. Overall, this study suggests that, although most features of HGSC tumor phenotypes are similar in Black and White populations, there may be clinically relevant differences. If validated, these phenotypes may be important for clinical decision-making and would have been missed by characterizing tumors from White individuals only. Significance: Elucidation of the somatic mutational landscape of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in Black individuals, who experience poor survival and are underrepresented in research, could inform patient prognosis and enable precision medicine opportunities.