Liliana Aparecida Lucci De Angelo Andrade

Implementation of a new histological grading system in ovarian mucinous carcinomas and its association with the risk of recurrence: a retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic significance of the GrowthBased Grade (GBG) system compared to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading in ovarian mucinous carcinoma (OMC). Although FIGO grading is commonly used, its prognostic value remains controversial. The GBG system, which classifies tumors as low-grade (G1) or high-grade (G2) based on the proportion of infiltrative growth, has emerged as a potential prognostic tool. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic significance of GBG and compare it with FIGO grading in OMC. DESIGN AND SETTING: This retrospective cohort study included 37 women with OMC treated at a single institution between 2009 and 2022. METHODS: GBG was determined by a histopathological review of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Clinical and demographic data, including FIGO stage, CA125 levels, surgical procedures, and follow-up information, were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the associations between GBG grading, FIGO stage, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: GBG 2 tumors were significantly associated with elevated CA125 levels, advanced FIGO stage (III), and bilaterality. Multivariate analysis showed that GBG 2 conferred a 5.4-fold higher risk of recurrence compared with GBG 1. While FIGO stage III was predictive of overall survival, FIGO grading was not associated with recurrence risk. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a potential prognostic value of the GBG system in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. GBG 2 tumors showed a higher risk of recurrence than GBG 1 tumors, whereas FIGO grading showed no such association. These findings align with previous reports and should be interpreted in the context of additional studies to clarify the system’s clinical relevance.

Preoperative Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Non-epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Clinical Features and Tumor Markers

Abstract Objective To evaluate the role of clinical features and preoperative measurement of cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein (HE4), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels in women with benign and malignant non-epithelial ovarian tumors. Methods One hundred and nineteen consecutive women with germ cell, sex cord-stromal, and ovarian leiomyomas were included in this study. The preoperative levels of biomarkers were measured, and then surgery and histopathological analysis were performed. Information about the treatment and disease recurrence were obtained from the medical files of patients. Results Our sample included 71 women with germ cell tumors (64 benign and 7 malignant), 46 with sex cord-stromal tumors (32 benign and 14 malignant), and 2 with ovarian leiomyomas. Among benign germ cell tumors, 63 were mature teratomas, and, among malignant, four were immature teratomas. The most common tumors in the sex cord-stromal group were fibromas (benign) and granulosa cell tumor (malignant). The biomarker serum levels were not different among benign and malignant non-epithelial ovarian tumors. Fertility-sparing surgeries were performed in 5 (71.4%) women with malignant germ cell tumor. Eleven (78.6%) patients with malignant sex cord-stromal tumors were treated with fertility-sparing surgeries. Five women (71.4%) with germ cell tumors and only 1 (7.1%) with sex cord-stromal tumor were treated with chemotherapy. One woman with germ cell tumor recurred and died of the disease and one woman with sex cord-stromal tumor recurred. Conclusion Non-epithelial ovarian tumors were benign in the majority of cases, and the malignant cases were diagnosed at initial stages with good prognosis. The measurements of CA125, HE4, and CEA serum levels were not useful in the preoperative diagnosis of these tumors.