Investigator

Levon Badiglian-Filho

AC Camargo Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology

LBLevon Badiglian-F…
Papers(8)
Empty node packet in …Residual Disease afte…Does sentinel node ma…Sentinel lymph node m…Comparison of high-gr…Ovarian sparing cyste…Vaginectomy with trac…Reconsidering adjuvan…
Collaborators(10)
Glauco BaiocchiAndre LopesLillian Yuri KumagaiReitan RibeiroRicardo dos ReisBruna Tirapelli Gonca…Carlos Chaves FaloppaLouise De BrotAndrea Guerreiro Mach…Luís Pires Melo Filho
Institutions(4)
Ac Camargo HospitalMcGill University Hea…Hospital de Cancer de…Instituto De Assistnc…

Papers

Empty node packet in endometrial cancer: predictors and clinical significance in the sentinel lymph node era

This study aimed to evaluate clinical and pathological factors associated with the occurrence of empty node packets during sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer. We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node mapping between November 2012 and December 2023. An empty node packet was defined as the intra-operative removal of a presumed sentinel node with no lymphoid tissue identified on final pathological examination. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors. Of 489 patients who had sentinel lymph node mapped, 23 (4.7%) had an empty node packet. In the univariate analysis, body mass index and myometrial invasion were significantly associated (p < .05). In the multi-variable analysis, only body mass index remained independently associated (odds ratio 1.075, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.14, p = .022) with an empty node packet. Tumor histology, grade, type of tracer, and surgical approach were not associated. No nodal recurrences occurred in patients with an empty node packet. Empty node packets are uncommon but clinically relevant during sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer. Higher body mass index was the only independent predictor, underscoring the influence of patient-related factors on mapping accuracy.

Residual Disease after Operative Hysteroscopy in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Associated with Polyps

Abstract Objective To evaluate the presence of residual disease in the uterine specimen after hysteroscopic polypectomy or polyp biopsy in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). Methods We analyzed a series of 104 patients (92 cases from the Hospital AC Camargo and 12 from the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo) with polyps that were diagnosed by hysteroscopy, showing endometrioid EC associated with the polyp or in the final pathological specimen. Patients underwent a surgical approach for endometrial cancer from January 2002 to January 2017. Their clinical and pathological data were retrospectively retrieved from the medical records. Results In 78 cases (75%), the polyp had EC, and in 40 (38.5%), it was restricted to the polyp, without endometrial involvement. The pathologic stage was IA in 96 cases (92.3%) and 90 (86.5%) had histologic grade 1 or 2. In 18 cases (17.3%), there was no residual disease in the final uterine specimen, but only in 9 of them the hysteroscopy suggested that the tumor was restricted to the polyp. In 5 cases (4.8%) from the group without disease outside of the polyp during hysteroscopy, myometrial invasion was noted in the final uterine specimen. This finding suggests the possibility of disease extrapolation through the base of the polyp. Conclusion Patients with endometrioid EC associated with polyps may have the tumor completely removed during hysteroscopy, but the variables shown in the present study could not safely predict which patient would have no residual disease.

Does sentinel node mapping impact morbidity and quality of life in endometrial cancer?

To evaluate the prevalence of post-operative complications and quality of life (QoL) related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. A prospective cohort included women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent lymph node staging, grouped as follows: SLN group (sentinel lymph node only) and SLN+LND group (sentinel lymph node biopsy with addition of systematic lymphadenectomy). The patients had at least 12 months of follow-up, and QoL was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cervical Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EORTC-QLQ-Cx24. Lymphedema was also assessed by clinical evaluation and perimetry. 152 patients were included: 113 (74.3%) in the SLN group and 39 (25.7%) in the SLN+LND group. Intra-operative surgical complications occurred in 2 (1.3%) cases, and all belonged to SLN+LND group. Patients undergoing SLN+LND had higher overall complication rates than those undergoing SLN alone (33.3% vs 14.2%; p=0.011), even after adjusting for confound factors (OR=3.45, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.47; p=0.007). The SLN+LND group had longer surgical time (p=0.001) and need for admission to the intensive care unit (p=0.001). Moreover, the incidence of lymphocele was found in eight cases in the SLN+LND group (0 vs 20.5%; p<0.001). There were no differences in lymphedema rate after clinical evaluation and perimetry. However, the lymphedema score was highest when lymphedema was reported by clinical examination at 6 months (30.1 vs 7.8; p<0.001) and at 12 months (36.3 vs 6.0; p<0.001). Regarding the overall assessment of QoL, there was no difference between groups at 12 months of follow-up. There was a higher overall rate of complications for the group undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, as well as higher rates of lymphocele and lymphedema according to the symptom score. No difference was found in overall QoL between SLN and SLN+LND groups.

Sentinel lymph node mapping versus sentinel lymph node mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial (ALICE trial)

Growing evidence suggest that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial cancer accurately detects lymph node metastasis. However, prospective randomized trials addressing the oncological outcomes of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer without lymphadenectomy are lacking. The present study aims to confirm that SLN biopsy without systematic node dissection does not negatively impact oncological outcomes. We hypothesized that there is no survival benefit in adding systematic lymphadenectomy to sentinel node mapping for endometrial cancer staging. Additionally, we aim to evaluate morbidity and impact in quality of life (QoL) after forgoing systematic lymphadenectomy. This is a collaborative, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial. After total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and SLN biopsy, patients will be randomized (1:1) into: (a) no further lymph node dissection or (b) systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Inclusion criteria are patients with high-grade histologies (endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma), endometrioid G1 or G2 with imaging concerning for myometrial invasion of ≥50% or cervical invasion, clinically suitable to undergo systematic lymphadenectomy. The primary objective is to compare 3-year disease-free survival and the secondary objectives are 5-year overall survival, morbidity, incidence of lower limb lymphedema, and QoL after SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. 178 participants will be randomized in this study with an estimated date for completing accrual of December 2024 and presenting results in 2027. NCT03366051.

Comparison of high-grade human papillomavirus-induced cervical lesions between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative women

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the evolution of high-grade human papillomavirus-induced cervical lesions between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative women. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative women were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study after undergoing large-loop excision of the transformation zone between January 2008 and December 2017 as participants in the high-grade cervical lesion screening program. The evolution of human papillomavirus lesions induced in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women was evaluated in comparison with the general population. The following potentially confounding variables were examined: age at treatment and at the end of follow-up, histologic grade of treated intraepithelial disease, compromised margins, adequacy of colposcopy during follow-up, and recurrence of histopathologic diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. RESULTS: Of the 195 women, 51 were human immunodeficiency virus-positive (26.2%) and 144 were human immunodeficiency virus-negative (73.8%). Age of menarche (11.8±1.5) and sexarche (14.5±2.2) were earlier in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women (p=0.021 and 0.006, respectively). Parity (2.35±109) and number of pregnancies (2.86±1.47) were higher in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women (p=0.027 and 0.018, respectively). The prevalence of incomplete schooling was lower in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women (47.1 vs. 19.8%, p=0.002). Smoking was more common in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women (58.8 vs. 31.9%, p=0.001). Compromised surgical margins were found in 33.3% of human immunodeficiency virus-positive and 16.7% of human immunodeficiency virus-negative women (p&lt;0.001). The risk of recurrence was 37.3% in human immunodeficiency virus-positive and 13.9% in human immunodeficiency virus-negative women (p&lt;0.001). Cumulative survival over months was shortened in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women (p&lt;0.001). CONCLUSION: human immunodeficiency virus-positive women in this cohort had a significantly higher risk of recurrence than human immunodeficiency virus-negative women in addition to shorter overall survival.

Reconsidering adjuvant radiotherapy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer: findings from the CIRCOL study group

To evaluate survival outcomes associated with intermediate-risk factors in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, with a focus on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. A multicenter retrospective cohort database comprising 1280 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer was analyzed. For inclusion, patients had tumors ≤4 cm (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stages Ia2-Ib2) and were treated surgically between January 2000 and December 2017. Patients with lymph node metastasis, positive surgical margins, or parametrial involvement were excluded. Intermediate-risk factors were defined as tumor size >2 cm to ≤4 cm, stromal invasion ≥10 mm, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion. A total of 759 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 158 (20.8%) received external beam radiotherapy. Patients who received external beam radiotherapy were older, more often underwent open surgery, and exhibited a higher incidence of adverse pathological features, including larger tumors, deeper stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. In multivariate analysis, tumor size >2 cm (HR 5.25, 95% CI 1.86 to 14.8) and stromal invasion ≥10 mm (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.30) were independently associated with increased recurrence risk. No variables were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality. The presence of ≥2 intermediate-risk factors significantly increased the risk of recurrence (HR 3.48, 95% CI 2.05 to 5.91) and cancer-related death (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.89), regardless of radiotherapy use. Tumor size and depth of stromal invasion were associated with increased recurrence risks. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk features.

27Works
8Papers
19Collaborators
2Trials

Positions

2007–

Researcher

AC Camargo Hospital · Gynecologic Oncology

Education

2009

PhD

Universidade Federal de São Paulo · Gynecologic Oncology

2002

Medical Residency

Universidade Federal de São Paulo · Gynecology and obstetrics

1998

Medical degree

Universidade de Santo Amaro · Medicine

Country

BR

Links & IDs
0000-0001-8741-166XLattes

Scopus: 26421610300

Researcher Id: B-9503-2015