Lea Rossi

Is total mesorectal excision mandatory in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing posterior pelvic exenteration? Prognostic role of mesorectal space involvement in a prospective ovarian cancer cohort

In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC), debulking surgery with posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE) is performed in 35-70 % of the patients to achieve no macroscopic residual disease. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of mesorectal involvement and its prognostic role in AEOC patients undergoing PPE. This prospective study analyzes data from a cohort of AEOC patients who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery (IDS) with PPE at the Léon Bérard Cancer Center in Lyon between 2018 and 2022. 73 patients underwent debulking surgery with PPE during the study period. 27 (34 %) underwent PPE during PDS and 46 (66 %) during IDS. 23 patients (31.5 %) had only serosal involvement, 19 (26 %) had bowel involvement up to the muscularis propria, and 7 (9.6 %) had up to the mucosa. Mesorectal involvement was observed in 40 cases (54.7 %) and was significantly associated with positive MLNs and higher liver recurrence rates. Hepatic metastases had an early onset (months, 9.8 vs 28.8; p = 0.0001) and were correlated with poorer OS (months, 20.9 vs 51.5) compared to recurrences in other sites. The persistence of positive mesorectum after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the IDS group seemed to be linked to poor OS (NR vs 42.7 months). Debulking surgery with PPE in AEOC patients is often needed. Total mesorectal excision should be performed in AEOC to achieve no residual disease because positive mesorectum after neoadjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be linked with poor OS, with early onset and increased incidence of liver metastasis.

Do surgeons overestimate diaphragmatic peritoneal disease in interval debulking surgery of ovarian cancer?

Cytoreductive surgery is a key point in ovarian cancer treatment. Substantial morbidity may be consecutive to this major radical surgery. However, the objective of no residual tumor (CC-0) had demonstrated its clear improvement of prognosis. Could macroscopically-driven interval debulking surgery (IDS) overestimate active cancer cells and be unnecessarily morbid? This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Center Leon Berard Cancer Center between 2000 and 2018. We included women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent an IDS including resection of peritoneal metastases on the diaphragmatic domes. The primary endpoint was the pathological outcome of peritoneal resections of diaphragmatic domes. Peritoneal resections of diaphragmatic domes consisted of 117 patients. 75 patients required resection of nodules from the right cupola only, 2 patients from the left cupola only, and 40 patients bilaterally. Pathological analysis of the diaphragmatic domes found that 84.6% of samples demonstrated the presence of malignant cells, and only 12.8% found no tumor involvement. Pathology analysis could not be performed for 3 patients (2.6%) (vaporization). Surgical evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer does not often overestimate peritoneal involvement by active carcinomatosis. Potential surgical morbidity due to peritoneal resection in IDS is admissible.