Vulvar dermatoses—Can a pattern‐based approach improve diagnostic yield?
AbstractBackgroundVulvar dermatoses (VD) pose a formidable challenge to clinicians and pathologists owing to various factors. The factors included are the histopathological heterogeneity of the vulva, moist and frictional environment, and the limited experience of gynecologists and general histopathologists in this field. To address this issue, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) proposed a histopathological tissue reaction‐based classification system for VD. Therefore, we attempted to study the utility of the 2006 ISSVD classification in reporting VD. We further evaluated if a dermatopathologist review could improve the diagnostic yield.Materials and MethodsThe vulvar biopsy reports (N = 106) were retrieved from histopathology case files, out of which benign non‐infectious conditions (n = 55) were included in the study. The diagnosis retrieved from the case files was considered the initial diagnosis. Three dermatopathologists reviewed each biopsy, and a tissue reaction pattern/diagnosis was assigned as per ISSVD 2006, and this was considered a review diagnosis. The initial and review diagnoses were compared and analyzed. We further studied and analyzed the effect of the dermatopathologist's review on the diagnostic yield.ResultsThe sclerotic pattern (34.6%) was the commonest tissue reaction pattern, followed by spongiotic (18%) and acanthotic patterns (14.5%) independently or in combination. The non‐specific/descriptive report rate was significantly decreased following 2006 ISSVD and the dermatopathologist's review (83.6% vs.1.8%).ConclusionRendering tissue reaction patterns to vulvar biopsies will enable a comprehensive understanding of lesions and aid in clinically relevant reporting. In addition, dermatopathologists' review of difficult vulvar biopsies increases the diagnostic yield.
