Investigator

Lavanya Gurram

Cancercare Manitoba

LGLavanya Gurram
Papers(5)
Clinical outcomes of …Cervical Cancer Treat…Reporting of dose–vol…Outcomes of Cervical …Reirradiation with ad…
Collaborators(10)
Surbhi GroverSamarpita MohantySudeep GuptaSupriya ChopraAmita MaheshwariBharat RekhiNikhil KalyaniJaya GhoshPrachi MittalShirley Lewis
Institutions(6)
Cancercare ManitobaUniversity Of Pennsyl…Tata Memorial HospitalHomi Bhabha National …Jaslok Hospital and R…Manipal Academy Of Hi…

Papers

Clinical outcomes of adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy technique in locally advanced cervical cancer: A real-world data

To evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-based adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC followed by IC-ISBT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in resource-constrained settings. LACC patients treated with adaptive brachytherapy techniques were analyzed to evaluate treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test for univariate analysis. Out of 141 eligible patients with LACC, 87 (61.7%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in referral hospitals, while 54 (38.3%) were treated at our center. We divided our cohort into two groups: poor EBRT responder group (n = 70 [49.6%]) where IC-ISBT was adapted to achieve optimum tumor doses and OAR optimization group 71 (50.4%) where IC-ISBT was performed to reduce OAR doses. Median HRCTV-D90 dose was 88 Gy (range 70-109 Gy) with median HRCTV volume 33cc (range 15-96). Median D2cc doses to OARs were 90 Gy (range 70-107), 71 Gy (range 55-105) and 70 Gy (range 47-90) to bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively. At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83%, 75%, 64% and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better outcomes for OAR optimization compared to poor EBRT responders, with 3-year LC (95% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), LRC (87.3% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), DFS (79.2% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), and OS (86.2% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: In resource-constrained settings, implementation of Adaptive IC-ISBT is a viable alternative for optimizing OAR doses in LACC. However proactive approach employing IC-ISBT for tumor dose-escalation from first fraction of BT is warranted for improving LC in poor EBRT responders.

Cervical Cancer Treatment in HIV-Positive Patients: A Survey of Treatment Practices in India

PURPOSE Chemoradiation remains a challenge in women living with HIV (WLWH) and cervical cancer primarily because of concerns regarding immune status. With limited literature available to help guide the management of these patients, clinical practices among oncologists are variable across India. Hence, we conducted a survey among radiation oncologists in India to assess the patterns of current practices of treating cervical cancer with chemoradiation in WLWH. MATERIALS AND METHODS A questionnaire consisting of 12 questions related to the treatment of cervical cancer in WLWH was distributed to radiation oncologists at two national conferences in India. RESULTS The questionnaire was distributed to 105 radiation oncologists, and 90 (85.7%) responses were received. 95.5% of respondents reported that patients with advanced cervical cancer constituted the majority of their practice. Chemoradiation was reported as the most common modality of planned treatment. Ninety-four percentage of respondents reported that they referred patients to an antiretroviral therapy clinic before starting definitive treatment. The majority of respondents (68%) do not plan for concurrent chemotherapy if CD4 counts were &lt; 200 cells/mm3. As many as 50% of respondents reported that they would only start antiretroviral therapy when CD4 counts drop. Poor social support (37.6%), concurrent infections during treatment (28.2%), acute toxicities (21.2%), and poor nutrition (13%) were cited as the most common reasons for treatment interruption in cervical cancer patients with HIV. CONCLUSION This survey highlights the prevalent inconsistencies in treatment protocols employed by radiation oncologists in India for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer in WLWH. It also reflects the need for social and nutritional support to help improve compliance and thereby improve outcomes in these patients.

Outcomes of Cervical Cancer in HIV-Positive Women Treated With Radiotherapy at a Tertiary Care Center in India

PURPOSE There are limited data on management of cervical cancer in women living with HIV in the modern antiretroviral therapy era. The study aimed to evaluate outcomes and toxicities of these patients treated with radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of HIV-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy between 2011 and 2018 was conducted at a tertiary care center in India. RESULTS Eighty-two HIV-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy were identified. Their median age was 45 years. Seventy-four (90%) patients received radiotherapy with curative-intent and eight patients received palliative radiotherapy. Median CD4 count at the start of treatment was 342 cells/mm3 (interquartile range: 241-531). Among patients planned for definitive radiotherapy, concurrent cisplatin was planned in 52 (70%) patients with a median of four chemotherapy cycles, and 81% (n = 60) patients received brachytherapy. Among patients who received brachytherapy, the median prescription dose was 80 Gy. Seventy-seven patients completed their prescribed treatment. At a median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year disease-free survival of patients planned with curative-intent was 54%. On multivariate analysis, treatment completion was associated with favorable disease-free survival. Grade III/IV acute gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in five (6.8%) patients, whereas 30% patients had grade III/IV acute hematologic toxicity. All these patients completed their planned radiotherapy with good supportive care. CONCLUSION Standard treatment of chemoradiation should be planned in women living with HIV with well-managed HIV presenting with locally advanced cervical cancer. Our study highlights the need for optimal management of these patients by a multidisciplinary team with intensive supportive care to ensure completion of planned treatment to achieve better outcomes.

Reirradiation with advanced brachytherapy techniques in recurrent GYN cancers

To evaluate clinical outcomes of recurrent gynaecological cancers treated with reirradiation (reRT) using advanced brachytherapy (BT) technique. Seventy-six women who underwent reRT with BT for gynaecological cancers at our institute between January 2000 and December 2019 were analysed to determine patient, disease and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. Descriptive analysis was used for demographics, and the Kaplan Meir method was used for survival analysis. Median age at recurrence was 55 years (Range: 35-73). Forty-three patients had recurrent cervical cancer with intact uterus, and 33 had recurrent vault/vaginal cancers post adjuvant RT. Eight patients received EBRT prior to BT (Range: 30-50Gy). Twenty-two patients (28.9%) received salvage chemotherapy before consideration of brachytherapy. Brachytherapy application was done using MUPIT in 38, Vienna applicator in 20, Syed Neblett in 8, central vaginal cylinder in 3, multicatheter intravaginal applicator in 2, tandem-ovoids in 4 and Houdek applicator in 1 patient. Median cumulative EQD2 for all courses of radiation was 108 Gy (IQR 92-123 Gy). At median follow up of 39 months, local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) at 2-years was 60%, 56.3%, and 72.9 respectively. Patients who had recurrences beyond 2 years had significantly better OS compared to early recurrences. Patients who received BT doses >40 Gy had a higher LC and PFS. Grade 3 to 4 late rectal toxicity was seen in 10 (13%), bladder toxicity in 6 (8%) and vaginal fibrosis in 24 (31%) patients. The use of advanced BT approach in reirradiation setting is a feasible and safe option in treatment of post-treatment recurrent cervical, endometrial, and vaginal cancers.

5Papers
11Collaborators