Kristina Sundquist

Long-term outcomes after unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: A registry-based retrospective cohort study

Background Opportunistic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is recommended in women who have undergone a hysterectomy due to gynecological carcinomas and/or in women with genetic indications, especially for women who do not intend to conceive. However, there is ongoing debate about whether BSO should be recommended in premenopausal women, due to the early cessation of estradiol because of BSO which is linked to several health concerns, including coronary artery disease (CAD) and osteoporosis. This study aims to explore whether ovarian cancer can be prevented by unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) while not affecting the long-term risk of CAD and osteoporosis. Methods and findings By accessing the Swedish national registries, this retrospective cohort study included 42,306 women who underwent USO between 1993 and 2018 before the age of 50 years. These women were randomly matched with 211,530 women who had not undergone USO using a propensity score matching approach to ensure comparability between the groups. Follow-up started on the date of USO operation and continued until the earliest occurrence of the following events: diagnosis of specific outcomes of interest, death from any cause, or the end of the study period (31st December 2018). Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall and histology-specific ovarian cancer, CAD, and osteoporosis associated with USO. After a median follow-up of 13 years, our analyses revealed that USO was not associated with subsequent risk of CAD (HR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.95, 1.09]) and osteoporosis (HR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.98, 1.16]). However, USO was significantly associated with a reduced risk of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.45, 0.92]). No differences were found when the analyses were stratified by hysterectomy. The main limitation of the study was that some confounding factors, such as BRCA1/2 pathological mutant status, were not available in our database. Conclusions Our study suggests that USO reduces the risk of HGSCs but was not associated with CAD or osteoporosis after a median 13-year follow-up. These results suggest that USO may be a safer option than BSO for lowering ovarian cancer risk in premenopausal women, as it could avoid the negative health effects of early menopause.

Risks of non-ovarian cancers in women with borderline ovarian tumor: a national cohort study in Sweden

Abstract Background Associations between different cancer types are known. The affirmation of the risk for non-ovarian cancer after ovarian borderline tumors (BOT) is, however, sparse. Aim To analyze the risk of subsequent or simultaneous cancers in women with BOTs compared with the general female Swedish population. Methods An open cohort study (1995–2018) was conducted where a diagnosis of BOTs as well as subsequent or simultaneous cancer diagnoses were obtained from the Swedish Cancer Register and matched to the Total Population Register. Each woman with BOT was followed until non-ovarian cancer, death or emigration and could only be included once for the outcome. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for specific non-ovarian cancers were analyzed. Results The 4998 women with serous and mucinous BOTs were diagnosed during 1995–2018 with a mean age of 55.7 years (SD 16.0) at diagnosis. Compared with the general female population, women with BOTs had increased risks for non-ovarian cancer in colon (SIR = 2.5; 95% CI 2.0–3.1), rectum (SIR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.5), small intestine (SIR = 5.0; 95% CI 2.3–9.5), cervix (SIR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.4–4.2), endometrium (SIR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.9–3.1), pancreas (SIR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.4–3.5), upper aerodigestive tract (SIR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.2–3.8), lung (SIR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.4–2.3), kidney (SIR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.4–3.7) and bladder (SIR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.1–2.8). Among women with serous BOTs, the risk of thyroid gland cancer (SIR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.2–6.4) was also increased. Lung and pancreas cancer showed increased risks more than 1 year after a diagnosis of BOT. Conclusions This Swedish population-based study demonstrated an increased risk of multiple malignancies including lung and pancreatic cancers beyond the first year of diagnosis in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs), suggesting a potential shared etiology.

Cervical neoplasia in relation to socioeconomic and demographic factors – a nationwide cohort study (2002–2018)

AbstractIntroductionCervical cancer is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. We aimed to estimate the association between sociodemographic factors and cervical neoplasia.Material and methodsIn this Swedish nationwide open cohort study, 4 120 557 women aged ≥15 years at baseline were included between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2018. The two outcomes were cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ identified in the Swedish Cancer Register. Sociodemographic factors (age, education level, family income level, region of residency, country of origin) were the main predictors. Incidence rates per 10 000 person‐years were calculated. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, including parity, urogenital infections, alcohol‐ and drug‐use disorders, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (used as a proxy for tobacco abuse).ResultsIn 38.9 million person‐years of follow‐up, 5781 (incidence rate: 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–1.5) and 62 249 (incidence rate 16.9, 95% CI 15.9–16.1) women were diagnosed with cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ, respectively. Women from Eastern Europe had a hazard ratio of 1.18 (95% CI 1.05–1.33) for cervical cancer compared with Swedish‐born women, while women from non‐Western regions were inversely associated with cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ. Women with a low education level had a hazard ratio of 1.37 (95% CI 1.29–1.45) for cervical cancer compared with women with a high education level.ConclusionsWomen from the Middle East and Africa living in Sweden seem to suffer less from cervical neoplasia, whereas women with low education and women from Eastern Europe seem to suffer more from cervical cancer.