Kosei Hasegawa

BRCA1 Promoter Methylation in Ovarian Cancer: Clinical Relevance and a Novel Diagnostic Approach Using Fragment Analysis

ABSTRACTHomologous recombination deficiency (HRD) tests, including MyChoice CDx, are companion diagnostics for poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, a major HRD cause, may correlate with poorer prognosis. This study aimed to develop a simple, accurate method for detecting BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and elucidate the characteristics of such cases. BRCA1 promoter methylation was analyzed using bisulfite sequencing (BIS‐seq) in high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma specimens. We developed a newly developed BRCA1 methylation assay, BRCA1‐Fragment Analysis of Methylation (BRCA1‐FAM), which combines restriction enzyme digestion with fragment analysis. The accuracy of this assay was compared to the results of BIS‐seq. We evaluated the relationship between BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and prognosis and examined its association with BRCA1 expression and loss of heterozygosity. BRCA1 mutations and promoter methylation were mutually exclusive in the analyzed cases, with methylation observed in 28.9% (22/76) of primary debulking surgery cases. The BRCA1‐FAM showed high sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (100%) for detecting BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, comparable to BIS‐seq. Cases with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation had significantly poorer progression‐free survival (log‐rank test, p = 0.048). Among these cases, 86.4% displayed abnormal BRCA1 immunostaining, with lower frequencies of BRCA1 loss of heterozygosity compared to those of other groups. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation is associated with poor prognosis, underscoring the importance of its identification for HRD stratification. BRCA1‐FAM is a simple and highly accurate method for evaluating BRCA1 promoter methylation. This approach may potentially enhance the precision of personalized therapies for ovarian cancer.

Evaluating the specific STAT3 inhibitor YHO-1701 in ovarian cancer cell lines and patient-derived cell models: efficacy, mechanisms, and therapeutic potential

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays key roles in regulating cancer cell proliferation, survival, and metastasis. We aimed to determine the effects of YHO-1701, an oral STAT3 inhibitor, in ovarian cancer (OC). We evaluated the impact of YHO-1701 on cell growth in patient-derived cells (PDCs) and OC cell lines using standard cell proliferation assays. Spheroid models derived from PDCs were assessed using three-dimensional (3D) cell viability assays. Antitumor activity was performed in SKOV3 xenograft mice treated orally administrated YHO-1701 with 20 mg/kg. Changes in STAT3 signaling were analyzed by western blotting. The molecular mechanisms of STAT3 inhibition were investigated by sequencing RNA and analyzing pathways in the SKOV3 using a small interfering RNA targeting STAT3 (STAT3 siRNA) and YHO-1701. YHO-1701 inhibited the growth of OC cell lines by preventing STAT3 dimerization and decreasing the expression of its downstream signaling molecule, survivin. The growth of PDCs and spheroids obtained from patients with primary and recurrent OCs was significantly inhibited. Antitumor effect was observed in the SKOV3 xenograft mice with YHO-1701. YHO-1701 induced apoptosis in OC cells. Additionally, p53 and/or MAPK signaling pathways were upregulated in SKOV3 cells incubated with YHO-1701 and in those with STAT3 siRNA. Our results showed that YHO-1701 suppressed cell growth in PDCs of OC, accompanied by survivin inhibition, and a decrease in the number of peritoneal metastasis in the mice by YHO-1701, compared with those treated with control. Therefore, YHO-1701 could be a promising candidate agent for treating OC.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer: Results from Study 309/KEYNOTE‐775

AbstractStudy 309/KEYNOTE‐775 is a phase 3 open‐label, randomized trial of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer with progression after platinum‐based therapy. Primary endpoints of superiority for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab were met for progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all‐comers (ie, regardless of mismatch repair [MMR] status) and patients with MMR proficiency (pMMR). We present results for the Japanese subset. Patients were randomized to oral lenvatinib 20 mg/day plus intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W; up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab) or TPC (intravenous doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 QW [3 weeks on/1 week off]). Primary endpoints were PFS by blinded independent central review per RECIST version 1.1 and OS. One hundred four patients were randomized in Japan (data cutoff, October 26, 2020; median follow‐up, 11.8 [range, 1.1–26.9] months). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus TPC were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.63–1.73) in patients with pMMR and 0.81 (0.50–1.31) in all‐comers. Hazard ratios for OS were 0.74 (0.41–1.34) with pMMR and 0.59 (0.33–1.04) for all‐comers. Adverse events were manageable and led to discontinuation of one/both study drugs in 36.5% of patients in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group versus 7.8% in the TPC group. Similar to the global Study 309/KEYNOTE‐775 results, this analysis suggested favorable efficacy and manageable safety with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab after platinum‐based chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced endometrial cancer and supports this combination as a new standard of care in this population.

Tegafur-uracil maintenance chemotherapy post-chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: Randomized trial

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but recurrence rates remain high. This multicenter phase-3 randomized trial (GOTIC-002) evaluated the efficacy of low-dose oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) as maintenance chemotherapy following curative CCRT for LACC. Between 2010 and 2018, 351 patients with stage Ib2-IVa cervical cancer were enrolled. After achieving complete or partial remission post-CCRT, patients were randomized 1:1 into observation (arm O) or UFT maintenance therapy (arm UFT). UFT doses were 300-400 mg/day based on body surface area for 2 years, disease progression or adverse effects occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) and safety as secondary endpoints. Patient characteristics were similar between the groups (n = 178 in arm O, n = 173 in arm UFT). During a median follow-up of 3 years, median PFS was not reached in either group. 5-year PFS rates were similar between them (arm O: 61.3 %, arm UFT: 62.0 %, hazard ratio: 0.92, P = .634). 5-year OS rates were also comparable (77.6 % vs 76.1 %, hazard ratio: 1.04, P = .869). Compliance with UFT ranged from 87.8 % to 98.8 %. Although adverse events were more frequent in arm UFT (93.5 % vs 73.9 %, odds ratio: 5.05), most were mild or moderate. Despite its tolerability, UFT did not improve PFS or OS. These findings suggest the need to reconsider maintenance therapy strategies after CCRT for potentially shifting away from cytotoxic chemotherapy towards alternative methods to enhance survival outcomes in patients with LACC.

Recent advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer

Abstract Cervical cancer is the third most common malignant tumor in women worldwide in terms of both incidence and mortality. The field of cervical cancer treatment is rapidly evolving, and various combination therapies are being explored to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and provide new treatment options for patients at different disease stages. Clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are now being conducted following a phase 3 trial with cemiplimab, an ICI, which demonstrated a significant improvement in prognosis in advanced or metastatic cervical cancer patients. These trials include monotherapy and combination therapy with other immune therapies, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. Furthermore, other approaches for controlling tumors via the immune system, such as therapeutic vaccination for specific tumor antigens or immune cell therapy including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are being investigated. Ongoing trials will continue to illuminate the optimal strategies for combining these therapies and addressing challenges associated with immune checkpoint failure in cervical cancer. Herein, we conducted a review of articles related to immunotherapy for cervical cancer and describe current treatment strategies for cervical cancer via immunotherapy.

Cemiplimab monotherapy in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

AbstractBackgroundIn the phase 3 EMPOWER‐Cervical 1/GOG‐3016/ENGOT‐cx9 study, cemiplimab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed after first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Japan.MethodsPatients were enrolled regardless of programmed cell death‐ligand 1 status and randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator's choice  single‐agent chemotherapy for up to 96 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Key secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).ResultsOverall, 608 patients were randomized, of whom 56 (9.2%) were in Japan (cemiplimab, n = 29; chemotherapy, n = 27). The median (range) duration of follow‐up was 13.6 (6.0–25.3) versus 18.2 (6.0–38.2) months for patients in Japan and for the overall population, respectively. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.4 (7.0‐not evaluable) and 9.4 (5.4–14.9) months for cemiplimab versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43–1.68). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.0 (1.4–8.2) versus 3.7 (1.8–4.2) months with cemiplimab and chemotherapy (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50–1.61), respectively. ORR was 17.2% for cemiplimab and 7.4% for chemotherapy (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.44–13.99). Incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events at any grade was 79.3% for cemiplimab and 100% for chemotherapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events were 37.9% versus 66.7% with cemiplimab and chemotherapy, respectively.DiscussionWhile acknowledging limitations inherent to a small subgroup analysis, the HR of 0.86 observed in Japanese patients suggests an emerging survival benefit despite a 4.6‐month shorter median duration of follow‐up versus the overall study population.

HER2-negative or low expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is uncommon high-grade endometrial cancer with limited treatment options. We evaluated the prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and HER2 gene amplification within large cohorts of UCS, and clarify clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low UCS. We examined HER2 protein expression in 148 patients of UCS using in vivo diagnostic HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) kits and HER2 gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 72 patients. HER2 IHC score was evaluated according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria for gastric cancer, which was negative in 41 patients, low expression of 1+ was observed in 57 patients, and HER2 high expression was observed in 50 patients (2+ in 38 and 3+ in 12 patients). There was no significant statistical difference in clinicopathological characteristics based on HER2 protein expression status. HER2 negative and low expression compared to high expression revealed poor overall survival in stage I/ II. The concordance between IHC and FISH results were relatively low compared to other cancer types (HER2 IHC score 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 5%, 15%, and 50%), and combining these results was not efficient as a prognostic factor in UCS. In contrast, the HER2 IHC score alone was a prognostic factor in stage I/II UCS. HER2 low group did not show specific clinicopathologic features. Since the HER2 IHC score low in advanced UCS is a predictive factor, stratification of UCS using HER2 IHC score for HER2 IHC score low group and developing adjuvant therapy may be proposed in the near future.

High expression of maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) impacts clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer and its inhibition suppresses ovarian cancer cells growth ex vivo

Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) is receiving an attention as a therapeutic target in various types of cancers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of Expression levels of MELK in 11 ovarian cancer cell lines were confirmed by western blotting. Inhibitory concentration of OTS167 was determined by colorimetric assay. We demonstrated MELK as both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for ovarian cancer using clinical ovarian cancer samples. MELK inhibition by OTS167 may be an effective approach to treat ovarian cancer patients.

Current and future strategies for treatment of ovarian clear cell carcinoma

AbstractOvarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is one of the five histological types of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). OCCC comprises 23% of all EOC cases in Japan, whereas the rate of OCCC in North America and Europe is much lower. OCCC is generally categorized as a rare gynecologic malignancy, and there is limited evidence for specific treatment. The clinical basis for treatment of OCCC is mostly based on retrospective studies, many of which were performed in Japan. Until recently, most randomized clinical trials for EOC have included OCCC; therefore, current treatment for OCCC is basically the same as that for other histologic types of EOC. However, the clinical characteristics of OCCC differ from those of high‐grade serous carcinoma, particularly for chemosensitivity, and there is a need to develop new treatment for OCCC. The molecular background of OCCC has unique features: tumors are usually negative for p53 mutations and positive for ARID1A and/or PIK3CA mutations, whereas p53 mutations are common in high‐grade serous or endometrioid carcinomas. These features may help in development of new treatment for OCCC. In this review, we described the current evidence for treatment of OCCC, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and we discuss ongoing clinical trials and preclinical studies of new treatment approaches for OCCC.

Long Intergenic Noncoding RNA OIN1 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Growth by Modulating Apoptosis-Related Gene Expression

Patients with advanced ovarian cancer usually exhibit high mortality rates, thus more efficient therapeutic strategies are expected to be developed. Recent transcriptomic studies revealed that long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) can be a new class of molecular targets for cancer management, because lincRNAs likely exert tissue-specific activities compared with protein-coding genes or other noncoding RNAs. We here show that an unannotated lincRNA originated from chromosome 10q21 and designated as ovarian cancer long intergenic noncoding RNA 1 (OIN1), is often overexpressed in ovarian cancer tissues compared with normal ovaries as analyzed by RNA sequencing. OIN1 silencing by specific siRNAs significantly exerted proliferation inhibition and enhanced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Notably, RNA sequencing showed that OIN1 expression was negatively correlated with the expression of apoptosis-related genes ras association domain family member 5 (RASSF5) and adenosine A1 receptor (ADORA1), which were upregulated by OIN1 knockdown in ovarian cancer cells. OIN1-specifc siRNA injection was effective to suppress in vivo tumor growth of ovarian cancer cells inoculated in immunodeficient mice. Taken together, OIN1 could function as a tumor-promoting lincRNA in ovarian cancer through modulating apoptosis and will be a potential molecular target for ovarian cancer management.

Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Identification of a Novel Oncogenic Fusion Gene SPON1-TRIM29 in Clinical Ovarian Cancer That Promotes Cell and Tumor Growth and Enhances Chemoresistance in A2780 Cells

Gene structure alterations, such as chromosomal rearrangements that develop fusion genes, often contribute to tumorigenesis. It has been shown that the fusion genes identified in public RNA-sequencing datasets are mainly derived from intrachromosomal rearrangements. In this study, we explored fusion transcripts in clinical ovarian cancer specimens based on our RNA-sequencing data. We successfully identified an in-frame fusion transcript SPON1-TRIM29 in chromosome 11 from a recurrent tumor specimen of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which was not detected in the corresponding primary carcinoma, and validated the expression of the identical fusion transcript in another tumor from a distinct HGSC patient. Ovarian cancer A2780 cells stably expressing SPON1-TRIM29 exhibited an increase in cell growth, whereas a decrease in apoptosis was observed, even in the presence of anticancer drugs. The siRNA-mediated silencing of SPON1-TRIM29 fusion transcript substantially impaired the enhanced growth of A2780 cells expressing the chimeric gene treated with anticancer drugs. Moreover, a subcutaneous xenograft model using athymic mice indicated that SPON1-TRIM29-expressing A2780 cells rapidly generated tumors in vivo compared to control cells, whose growth was significantly repressed by the fusion-specific siRNA administration. Overall, the SPON1-TRIM29 fusion gene could be involved in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer, and offers potential use as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for the disease with the fusion transcript.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from KEYNOTE‐826

AbstractPembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab demonstrated prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in the phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled KEYNOTE‐826 study. We report outcomes in patients enrolled in Japan. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment and OS in the global population; these were evaluated in patients with tumors with PD‐L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, all‐comers, and PD‐L1 CPS ≥10. Fifty‐seven patients from Japan were randomized (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 35; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 22). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved PFS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with PD‐L1 CPS ≥1 (n = 51; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 0.36 [0.16–0.77]), all‐comers (n = 57; 0.45 [0.22–0.90]), and patients with PD‐L1 CPS ≥10 (n = 25; 0.36 [0.12–1.07]). HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.38 (0.14–1.01), 0.41 (0.17–1.00), and 0.37 (0.10–1.30), respectively. Incidence of grade 3–5 AEs was 94% in the pembrolizumab group and 100% in the placebo group. Consistent with findings in the global KEYNOTE‐826 study, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab may prolong survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and had a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Antitumor Effect of Farletuzumab Ecteribulin in Molecular Subtypes of Endometrial Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

Abstract Endometrial cancer represents a significant health burden globally, particularly in postmenopausal women. Current treatment options for advanced-stage endometrial cancer remain limited, emphasizing the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to investigate farletuzumab ecteribulin (FZEC), an antibody–drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα), as a potential new therapeutic agent for endometrial cancer. We utilized a panel of 22 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, representing various histologic and molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer with different levels of FRα expression, to evaluate the antitumor effect of FZEC. FZEC was administered intravenously at doses of 5 and 12.5 mg/kg on day 0. Intratumoral accumulation of eribulin, the payload of FZEC, was visualized using phosphor-integrated dot imaging. FZEC demonstrated dose-dependent antitumor effects across the endometrial cancer–PDX panel. At 5 mg/kg, the FZEC efficacy was associated with FRα expression, with 100% of FRα 3+ models exhibiting tumor shrinkage compared with 33.3% of FRα-negative models. FZEC also demonstrated broad activity across both histologic and molecular subtypes. Intratumoral eribulin accumulation was highly correlated with antitumor effects, even in models with low FRα expression. Follow-up studies confirmed FRα-dependent antitumor effects while also indicating potential FRα-independent mechanisms of action. FZEC demonstrated a robust antitumor effect against the FRα-high endometrial cancer–PDX models with significant antitumor effects also observed, even in FRα-low or FRα-negative models. Notably, intratumoral eribulin accumulation exhibited a stronger correlation with efficacy than with FRα expression alone. These findings support further clinical development of FZEC for endometrial cancer treatment and highlight the complexity of the mechanisms of action of antibody–drug conjugates.

First-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer: 1-Year follow-up after final analysis of the ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001 phase 3 trial

The phase 3 ENGOT-en9/LEAP-001 trial (NCT03884101) comparing first-line lenvatinib+pembrolizumab with carboplatin+paclitaxel did not meet pre-specified statistical criteria for overall survival or progression-free survival in participants with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. We report results after an additional year of follow-up (overall median 54.5 [range; 46.5-69.0] months). Eligible participants were adult females with stage III to IV or recurrent, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer. Measurable or non-measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and radiographically apparent disease per blinded independent central review was required. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to lenvatinib+pembrolizumab or chemotherapy (paclitaxel+carboplatin). The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and safety. The median overall survival (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 30.9 (range; 25.4-37.6) months with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab versus 29.4 (range; 26.2-34.8) months with chemotherapy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21), 37.9 (range; 32.2-43.0) versus 32.3 (range; 27.2-35.7) months in all-comers (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.09), and not reached in either treatment group in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93]). Corresponding results for progression-free survival were 9.6 (range; 8.2-11.9) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.5) months (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22), 12.5 (range; 10.3-15.1) versus 10.2 (range; 8.4-10.4) months (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10]), and 31.8 (22.5 to not reached) versus 9.0 (range; 8.2-17.1) months (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93). Objective response rates were 50.6% versus 54.7%, 55.7% versus 55.5%, and 72.0% versus 58.0%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The results were consistent with those at the final analysis. The mismatch repair-proficient, all-comer, and mismatch repair-deficient populations continued to demonstrate antitumor activity for lenvatinib+pembrolizumab after an additional year of follow-up. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the exploratory nature of the analysis. ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03884101.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in East Asian participants with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: results from KEYNOTE-826 final analysis

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-826 study (NCT03635567), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. We report an exploratory analysis of outcomes for participants enrolled in East Asia based on the final analysis of KEYNOTE-826. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. All participants received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin or carboplatin for up to 6 cycles, and optionally received bevacizumab at the investigator's discretion. PFS and OS were dual primary endpoints. Ninety-seven participants from East Asia were enrolled in the intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (October 3, 2022), in the intention-to-treat population, median PFS in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy groups was 18.0 and 10.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]=0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.23-0.77); median OS was not reached and 20.4 months, respectively (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.28-0.99). In the programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 population, median PFS was 29.3 and 10.9 months, respectively (HR=0.36; 95% CI=0.19-0.68); median OS was not reached and 17.4 months, respectively (HR=0.43; 95% CI=0.22-0.86). The most common adverse events with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy were alopecia (75% vs. 68%) and anemia (67% vs. 65%). These data support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in East Asian patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635567.

Establishing a comprehensive panel of patient-derived xenograft models for high-grade endometrial carcinoma: molecular subtypes, genetic alterations, and therapeutic target profiling

High-grade endometrial cancer (EC) has a poor prognosis, but molecular classification-based treatments present new therapeutic opportunities. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) emerge as promising tools, yet a deeper understanding of antigen dynamics, optimal therapeutic sequencing, and resistance mechanisms is essential. This study investigates the utility of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for EC as preclinical platforms, evaluating molecular subtypes and the ADC targets expression of patient and PDX tumors. We developed a comprehensive panel of molecularly characterized PDX models from patients with EC representing various histological types. Molecular subtypes and gene alterations were analyzed using sequencing and immunohistochemistry. ADC targets, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, B7-H4, folate receptor alpha, and cadherin-6, were profiled. Thirty-one EC-PDX models were successfully established, maintaining histological fidelity and 93.1 % molecular subtype consistency with the patient tumors. Notably, 80.6 % of the PDX models exhibited high expression (2+/3+) of at least one ADC target, and 54.8 % displayed high expression of multiple targets. Remarkably, 9.7 % showed high expression of all targets, with gene mutations also characterized. Meanwhile, patient tumors, 78.8 % showed high expression (2+/3+) of at least one ADC target, and 63.6 % showed high expression of multiple targets. The molecularly classified EC-PDX panel, enriched with detailed antigen profiles and genetic data, provides a robust platform for investigating novel ADC therapies and precision treatment strategies for high-grade EC.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 expression in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a potential target for ovarian mucinous and clear cell carcinoma

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), a tyrosine kinase belonging to the HER family, is a known target for cancer therapy; recently, an anti-HER3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is developing. To understand HER3 expression in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), this study was conducted. We investigated the expression of HER3 in 202 patients with EOC using immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the association between HER3 expression, clinicopathological features, prognosis, and treatment timing. Of all the cases, 55.4% had a HER3 IHC score ≥ 1 + . In particular, 78.0% of the patients with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and 87.9% of the patients with mucinous carcinoma (MC) had a HER3 IHC score ≥ 1 + . Regarding clinicopathological features, early disease stage, feasibility of primary debulking surgery, no residual tumor, and low CA125 levels were more frequently observed in patients with a HER3 IHC score ≥ 1 + . Furthermore, a HER3 no-expression showed a significant association with a relatively short progression-free survival (PFS). And, for patients with mucinous carcinoma, those with a HER3 IHC score ≥ 1 + had poorer PFS and overall survival than those with a HER3 no-expression (no statistically significant difference). In addition, we analyzed HER3 expression at primary tumor and recurrence tumor in same patients. Thus, we observed the HER3 IHC score tended to change from 0 to ≥ 1 + in recurrence cases compared with primary cases. These observations suggested that patients with MC, CCC and recurrence of all histological type may potentially benefit from future clinical trials of HER3-directed therapies.

First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (len + pembro) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. We report results from the phase III, randomized, open-label European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial-en9/LEAP-001 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03884101 ) that evaluated len + pembro versus chemotherapy in first-line aEC. METHODS Patients with stage III to IV or recurrent, radiographically apparent EC and no previous chemotherapy or disease progression ≥6 months after neo/adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 plus carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min once every 3 weeks. Primary end points were PFS and OS, evaluated in the mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and all-comers populations. Noninferiority was assessed for OS at final analysis (FA) for len + pembro versus chemotherapy (multiplicity-adjusted, one-sided nominal alpha, .0159; null hypothesis–tested hazard ratio [HR], 1.1). RESULTS Eight hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned (len + pembro, n = 420 [pMMR population, n = 320]; chemotherapy, n = 422 [pMMR population, n = 322]). At FA (data cutoff, October 2, 2023), median PFS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 9.6 (8.2 to 11.9) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.5) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21]) and among all-comers was 12.5 (10.3 to 15.1) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.4) months (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.09]; descriptive analyses). Median OS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 30.9 (25.4 to 37.7) versus 29.4 (26.2 to 35.4) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26]; noninferiority P = .246, not statistically significant per multiplicity control strategy) and among all-comers was 37.7 (32.2 to 43.6) versus 32.1 (27.2 to 35.7) months (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 331/420 (79%) versus 274/411 (67%) treated patients. CONCLUSION First-line len + pembro did not meet prespecified statistical criteria for PFS or OS versus chemotherapy in pMMR aEC.

Gut microbiome associated with PARP inhibitor efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer

To investigate an association between the gut microbiome and efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer. This study conducted fecal microbiome analysis (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling for ovarian cancer patients who underwent PARPi maintenance therapy. Fecal and blood samples were collected at the baseline and the progressive disease (PD) or last follow-up. The relative abundance of gut microbes and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using linear discriminant analysis of effect size and the Cox proportional hazard model according to Baseline samples were available from 23 High fecal composition of

Prevalence and outcomes of germline pathogenic variants of homologous recombination repair genes in ovarian cancer

AbstractGermline pathogenic variants (PVs) are pivotal in gynecological oncology. We focused on the prevalence, clinicopathological features, and survival impact of homologous recombination repair (HRR) PVs in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, and 1248 patients with EOC were registered. Eligible patients (n = 1112) underwent germline DNA analysis for 26 cancer predisposition genes, including nine HRR‐related genes, such as BRCA1/2, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51C/D, and ATM. The associations between clinicopathological factors and HRR‐related PVs were examined. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Among 1091 analyzed patients, 153 (14.0%) carried PVs and 140 (12.8%) were HRR‐related. HRR‐PV‐positive status significantly correlated with serous carcinoma (22.9% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.0001) and advanced disease (18.5% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.0001). The HRR‐PV‐positive group exhibited higher prevalence of personal breast (12.9%) and familial breast/ovarian (29.2%) cancer history. HRR status independently improved overall survival in stage III/IV disease (P = 0.04) but not progression‐free survival. HRR‐related germline PVs exhibit distinct clinicopathological features with survival implications. Variants were significantly associated with serous carcinoma and advanced disease, underscoring the importance of genetic testing to develop individualized EOC treatment strategies. Considering the study period (2000–2019), the limited use of bevacizumab and poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance therapy should be recognized.

Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively. The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study

This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. This was a follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants received niraparib (starting dose 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events (defined as the overall incidence of the MedDRA Preferred Terms "thrombocytopenia" and "platelet count decreased") occurring in the 30 days after initial administration of niraparib, and secondary endpoints included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival. Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years; median body weight, 53.9 kg) were enrolled. As previously reported, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events during the first 30 days of treatment was 31.6%. At data cutoff, median (range) treatment exposure was 504.0 (56-1,054) days and mean ± standard deviation dose intensity was 154.4±77.5 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (n=14, 73.7%), decreased platelet count (n=12, 63.2%), decreased neutrophil count (n=11, 57.9%), anemia, vomiting, and decreased appetite (all n=9, 47.4%). One patient was diagnosed with treatment-related leukemia, which resulted in death. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 18.0 (5.6-26.7) months. Overall, the safety profile of niraparib was considered manageable in this study population of Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and was consistent with that observed in studies of non-Japanese patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis. Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis. Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively. Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.

Phase I Trial of First-line Bintrafusp Alfa in Patients with Locally Advanced or Persistent/Recurrent/Metastatic Cervical Cancer

Abstract Purpose: Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGFβ receptor II (a TGFβ “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), was evaluated as treatment in patients with locally advanced or persistent, recurrent, or metastatic (P/R/M) cervical cancer. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, phase Ib trial (NCT04551950), patients with P/R/M cervical cancer received bintrafusp alfa 2,400 mg once every 3 weeks plus cisplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel with (Cohort 1A; n = 8) or without (Cohort 1B; n = 9) bevacizumab; patients with locally advanced cervical cancer received bintrafusp alfa 2,400 mg every 3 weeks plus cisplatin plus radiation, followed by bintrafusp alfa monotherapy maintenance (Cohort 2; n = 8). The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included efficacy (including objective response rate) and pharmacokinetics. Results: At the data cutoff of April 27, 2022, patients in Cohorts 1A, 1B, and 2 had received bintrafusp alfa for a median duration of 37.9, 31.1, and 16.7 weeks, respectively. Two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 amylase elevation and grade 3 menorrhagia) unrelated to bintrafusp alfa were observed in Cohort 1B and none in other cohorts. Most treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest were grades 1–2 in severity, most commonly anemia (62.5%–77.8%) and bleeding events (62.5%–77.8%). Objective response rate was 75.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 34.9–96.8], 44.4% (95% CI, 13.7–78.8), and 62.5% (95% CI, 24.5–91.5) in Cohorts 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively. Conclusions: Bintrafusp alfa had manageable safety and demonstrated clinical activity, further supporting the investigation of TGFβ/PD-L1 inhibition in human papillomavirus–associated cancers, including cervical cancer.

First-Line Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy Versus Placebo + Chemotherapy for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results of KEYNOTE-826

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The phase III, double-blind KEYNOTE-826 trial of pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, showed statistically significant survival benefits with the addition of pembrolizumab for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (primary data cutoff: May 3, 2021). This article reports the protocol-specified final overall survival (OS) results tested in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, all-comer, and CPS ≥10 populations. At the final data cutoff (October 3, 2022), the median study follow-up duration was 39.1 months (range, 32.1-46.5 months). In the PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (N = 548), all-comer (N = 617), and CPS ≥10 (N = 317) populations, median OS with pembrolizumab–chemotherapy versus placebo–chemotherapy was 28.6 months versus 16.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.74]), 26.4 months versus 16.8 months (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.77]), and 29.6 months versus 17.4 months (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78]), respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 82.4% with pembrolizumab–chemotherapy and 75.4% with placebo–chemotherapy. These results show that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, continued to provide clinically meaningful improvements in OS for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Tisotumab vedotin in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: results from the innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial

Tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer overall survival compared with chemotherapy as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in the phase III, multi-national, open-label innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial. We report the results of a sub-group analysis of enrolled Japanese patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to tisotumab vedotin or investigator-choice chemotherapy (topotecan [nogitecan hydrochloride], vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. Among 502 randomized patients, 101 were Japanese (tisotumab vedotin, n = 50; chemotherapy, n = 51). With 13.7 months of median follow-up in Japanese patients, median overall survival was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7 to not estimable) with tisotumab vedotin and 8.5 months (95% CI 6.8 to 10.6) with chemotherapy, representing a 55% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77). Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.95). The confirmed objective response rate was 24.0% (95% CI 13.1 to 38.2) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 10.4) with chemotherapy. All patients in the tisotumab vedotin and chemotherapy arms had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; grade ≥3 events occurred in 42.9% and 66.0%, respectively. Six patients (12.2%) discontinued tisotumab vedotin due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Consistent with global findings, tisotumab vedotin resulted in clinical improvement compared with chemotherapy across all efficacy end points, and demonstrated a manageable adverse event profile in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.